Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implementation of Lean and Six Sigma quality initiatives in hospitals: A goal theoretic perspective

  • Published:
Operations Management Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizational quality improvement practices have gained wide acceptance in manufacturing industries over the last several decades. A substantial number of books have been written on Lean and Six Sigma alone, which today are the leading improvement initiatives. The healthcare industry however has been slower to adopt these methods, although anecdotal evidence suggests they are now being gradually diffused throughout hospitals on an increasing basis. Yet, these new practices have been developed substantially without a theoretical foundation (Linderman et al. J Oper Manag 21:193–203, 2003) and the question of industry “fit” is the topic of debate for many physicians and administrators (Kassirer N Engl J Med 339:1543–1545, 1998). This article provides the descriptive results from our mixed methods research, combining survey questionnaire with semi-structured interviews, that examines implementation of two quality improvement initiatives (Lean and Six Sigma) in a cross-sectional sample of hospitals. We used correlations and non-parametric tests to examine relationships between goal attainment and quality management, and present descriptive findings about reported usage and adoption of quality initiatives. Importantly, we find that the efficacy of quality improvement initiatives in healthcare may be impeded by the lack of goal clarity and measurement. We build on these initial results by offering recommendations to improve results in practice, as well as an agenda for further research of quality initiatives in healthcare. The objectives of our research are to better understand how Lean and Six Sigma fit in the healthcare industry and to explore goal and value attainment from these projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams R, Warner P, Hubbard B, Goulding T (2004) Decreasing turnaround time between general surgery cases. J Nurs Adm 34:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahire P, Golhar D, Waller M (1996) Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decis Sci 27:23–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Assaf AF, Assaf R (1997) Managed care quality: a practical guide. CRC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander J, Weiner B, Griffith J (2006) Quality improvement and hospital financial performance. J Organ Behav 27:1003–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsness ZI, Shortell SM, Gillies RR, et al (1993) The quality march: national survey profiles quality improvement activities. Hosp Health Network December 67(23):52–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tovim DI, Bassham JE, Bennett DM et al (2008) Redesigning care at the Flinders Medical Centre: clinical process redesign using “lean thinking”. Med J Aust 188:S27–S31

    Google Scholar 

  • Black K, Revere L (2006) Six Sigma arises from the ashes of TQM with a twist. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 19:259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer GA, Selden SC (2000) Why elephants gallop: assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. J Public Adm Res Theory 10:685–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck C (2001) Application of Six Sigma to reduce medical errors. Annu Qual Congr P 55:739–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush SH, Lao MR, Simmons KL et al (2007) Patient access and clinical efficiency improvement in a resident hospital-based women’s medicine center clinic. Am J Manag Care 13:686–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan MD, Kujawa D (2006) Six Sigma in health care management and strategy. Health Care Manag 25:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan ALF, Pharm BS (2004) Use of Six Sigma to improve pharmacist dispensing errors at an outpatient clinic. Am J Med Qual 19:128–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan WP, Chiu W, Chen W et al (2005) Applying Six Sigma methodology to maximize magnetic resonance imaging capacity in a hospital. Int J Healthc Technol Manag 6:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassin MR (1998) Is health care ready for Six Sigma quality? Milbank Q 76:565–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassin R (2008) The Six Sigma initiative at Mount Sinai Medical Center. Mount Sinai J Med 75:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Lin J, Chang C (2005) Taiwan: improving radiography through application of Six Sigma techniques. J Health Qual 27:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson JB, Warrick LH, Howard R, Vollum J (2005) Deploying Six Sigma in a health care system as a work in progress. J Qual Patient Saf 31:603–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels SE (2007) Six Sigma at Cigna. Qual Prog 40:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson EW, Singh S, Cheung DS et al (2008) Application of Lean manufacturing techniques in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 11:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Does RJ, Vermaat TM, Verver JP et al (2009) Reducing start time delays in operating rooms. J Qual Technol 41:95–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow D, Samson D, Ford S (1999) Exploding the myth: do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Prod Oper Manag 8:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenckpohl D, Bowers L, Cooper H (2007) Use of the Six Sigma methodology to reduce incidence of breast milk administration errors in the NICU. Neonatal Netw 26:161–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Elberfeld A, Goodman K, Van Kooy M (2004) Using the Six Sigma approach to meet quality standards for cardiac medication administration. J Clin Outcomes Manag 11:510–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge NE, Woods SS, Bonello RS et al (2006) Using the Six Sigma process to implement the centers for disease control and prevention guideline for hand hygiene in 4 intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med 21:S35–S42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esimai G (2005) Lean Six Sigma reduces medication errors. Qual Prog 38:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks C (2007) Using Six Sigma and Lean methodologies to improve OR throughput. AORN J 86:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JW, Tesone D (2001) Management fads: emergence, evolution, and implications for managers. Acad Manag Exec 15:122–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin E, Raven D, Sweetapple C, Del Giudice FR (2004) Faster test results. Qual Prog 37:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman A, Donnell L, Hepp H, Mack T (2007) Improving communication and documentation concerning preliminary and final radiology reports. J Healthc Qual. Available via: http://www.nahq.org/journal/ce/article.html?article_id=276. Accessed August 15, 2009

  • Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) (2009) Available via: http://www.himss.org/ASP/membershipHome.asp. Accessed on August 16, 2009

  • Hendricks K, Singhal V (2001) Firm characteristics, total quality management, and financial performance. J Oper Manag 19:269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson T, Currie G, Keill P et al (2005) New York-Presbyterian Hospital: translating innovation into practice. J Qual Patient Saf 31:554–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R, Michel S (2008) Three outcomes of service recovery; customer recovery, process recovery, and employee recovery. Int J Oper Prod Manage 28:79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Commission (2009) National Patient Safety Goals. Available via: http://www.jointcommission.org/patientsafety/nationalpatientsafetygoals/. Accessed August 16, 2009

  • Kang JO, Kim MH, Hong SE et al (2005) The application of the Six Sigma program for the quality management of the PACS. Am J Roentgenol 185:1361–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassirer JP (1998) Doctor discontent. N Engl J Med 339:1543–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly A, Bryant M, Cox L, Jolley D (2007) Improving emergency department efficiency by patient streaming to outcomes-based teams. Aust Health Rev 31:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam MY, Poon GKK, Chin KS (2008) An organizational learning model for vocational education in the context of TQM culture. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 25:238–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy FJ (1989) The psychology of work behavior. Brooks-Cole, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham GP, Yukl GA (1975) A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Acad Manage J 18:824–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc F, McLaughlin S, Freedman J et al (2004) A Six Sigma approach to maximizing productivity in the cardiac cath lab. J Cardiovasc Manag 15:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie M, Hagood C, Royer A et al (2006) Using lean methods to improve OR turnover times. AORN 84:849–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderman K, Schroeder R, Zaheer S, Choo A (2003) Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective. J Oper Manag 21:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderman K, Schroeder R, Choo A (2005) Six Sigma: the role of goals in improvement teams. J Oper Manag 21:779–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA (1970) Job satisfaction and job performance: a theoretical analysis. Organ Behav Hum Perform 3:157–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke EA, Shaw K, Saari L, Latham G (1981) Goal setting and task performance. Psychol Bull 90:125–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WF (2007) Quality models: selecting the best model to deliver results. Physician Exec 33:24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri RA, Mason CE, Demko LA (2008) Application of Six Sigma/CAP methodology: controlling blood-product utilization and costs. J Healthc Manag 53:183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry JL, Porter LW (1982) Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Acad Manag Rev 7:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Printezis A, Gopalakrishnan M (2007) Current pulse: can a production system reduce medical errors in health care? Qual Manag Health Care 16:226–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab SS, Grzybicki DM, Stewart WR et al (2008) Effect of Lean method implementation in the histopathology section of an anatomical pathology laboratory. J Clin Pathol 61:1193–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers R, Hunter JE (1992) A foundation of good management practice in government: management by objectives. Public Admin Rev 52:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraph J, Benson P, Schroeder R (1989) An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality. Decis Sci 20:810–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Zhang D (2005) Evolution of quality: first fifty issues of production and operations management. Prod Oper Manag 14:468–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Liedtke C, Choo AS (2008) Six Sigma: definition and underlying theory. J Oper Manag 26:236–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipton H, Armstrong C, West M, Dawson J (2008) The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance. Int J Qual Health Care 20:439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shortell S, O’Brien J, Hughes E et al (1994) Assessing the progress of TQM in US hospitals: findings from two studies. Qual Lett Healthc Lead 6:14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortell SM, Bennett CL, Byck GR (1998) Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Q 76:593–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamatis DH (2000) Who needs Six Sigma, anyway? Qual Digest. Available via: http://www.qualitydigest.com/may00/html/sixsigmacon.html. Accessed August 15, 2009

  • Tsasis P, Bruce-Barrett C (2008) Organizational change through Lean thinking. Health Serv Manag Res 21:192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Heuvel J, Does RJ, Bogers AJ, Berg M (2006) Implementing Six Sigma in the Netherlands. J Qual Patient Saf 32:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk LA, Redmon WK (1990) A daily-adjusted goal-setting and feedback procedure for improving productivity in a university admissions office. J Organ Behav Manage 11:55–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright BE (2004) The role of work context in work motivation: a public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories. J Public Admin Res Theor 14:59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright PM, Kacmar KM (1994) Goal specificity as determinant of goal commitment and goal change. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 59:242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl GA, Latham GP (1978) Interrelationships among employee participation, individual differences, goal difficulty, goal acceptance, goal instrumentality, and performance. Pers Psychol 31:305–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Texas at Houston, 1200 Herman Pressler, RAS E-341, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    James R. Langabeer, Jami L. DelliFraine & Ibrahim Abbass

  2. Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

    Janelle Heineke

Authors
  1. James R. Langabeer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jami L. DelliFraine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Janelle Heineke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ibrahim Abbass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James R. Langabeer.

Appendix I: Survey questions

Appendix I: Survey questions

figure a1
figure a2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langabeer, J.R., DelliFraine, J.L., Heineke, J. et al. Implementation of Lean and Six Sigma quality initiatives in hospitals: A goal theoretic perspective. Oper Manag Res 2, 13–27 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-009-0021-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-009-0021-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation