Skip to main content
Log in

Variations in Park Facility Valuations across Neighborhoods

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The obesity epidemic has renewed policy interest in provision of physical activity-enhancing park facilities. Public health researchers have noted variability in physical activity levels associated with different types of facilities. We assess the hedonic valuation of different types of park facilities. For homes located ¼ mile from the nearest park, the hedonic value of a 1/10 mile improvement in proximity ranges from an 1.3 % increase in home price in African American neighborhoods to a 0.3 % price reduction in “average” neighborhoods. Similar variation occurs across the home price distribution, park facilities, and neighborhood characteristics. Park funding implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For cases where parks have more than one facility, we include the distance to the park for each facility type.

  2. The direct effect of proximity to parks is given by the terms inside the square brackets in (3). Indirect effects work through the spatial multiplier, ρ, and exist because house prices are spatially correlated (LeSage and Pace 2009).

  3. There is some concern that the financial recession of 2007–2008 may have affected home sales in high/low income neighborhoods differently. However, the housing market in Dallas County was less affected than housing markets in other regions of the country. Additionally, comparative sales volume in low-, medium- and high- income neighborhoods in Dallas Country were approximately the same in 2008 as before the financial recession (i.e. 2005).

  4. The calculated semi-elasticities include only the direct effect of park proximity.

References

  • Anderson ST, West SE (2006) Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics 36(6):773–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial Econometric: Methods and Models (Vol. Book, Whole). Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asabere PK, Huffman FE (2009) The relativei impacts of trails and greenbelts on home price. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 38(4):408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethell C, Simpson L, Stumbo S, Carle AC, Gombojav N (2010) National, state, and local disparities in childhood obesity. Health Affairs 29(3):347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GM, Pollakowski HO (1977) Economic valuation of shoreline. The Review of Economics and Statistics 59(3):272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC (2010). ACES--Active Community Environments. (Vol. 2010): Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Children Below 200 % Poverty (2011). http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/acrossstates/Rankings.aspx?ind=47. Accessed November 12, 2012 2012.

  • Cohen DA, Ashwood JS, Overton A, Staten LK, McKenzie T (2006) Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics 118(5):e1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. A., Golinelli, D., Williamson, S., Sehgal, A., Marsh, T., & McKenzie, T. L. (2009). Effects of Park Improvements on Park Use and Physical Activity: Policy and Programming Implications. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(6), 475–480, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.017.

  • Cohen, D. A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Derose, K. P., Martinez, H., Setodji, C., et al. (2010). Parks and physical activity: Why are some parks used more than others? Preventive Medicine, 50, Supplement(0), S9-S12, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.020.

  • Crompton JL (2001) The impact of parks on property values: a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research 33(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  • DHHS (2008) Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. In: Committee PAGA (ed) Washington. D.C, Department of Health and Human Services

    Google Scholar 

  • Espey M, Owusu-Edusei K (2001) Neighborhood Parks and Residential Property Values in Greenville, South Carolina. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33(3):487–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2008) Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall

  • Grow HM, Saelens BE, Kerr J, Durant NH, Norman GJ, Sallis JF (2008) Where are youth active? Roles of proximity, active transport, and built environment. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 40(12):2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, G. W., Brownson, R. C., Kruger, J., Miles, R., Powell, K. E., Ramsey, L. T., et al. (2006). The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: a systematic review. J Phys Activ Health, 3(IS), S55-76.

  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E (2002) Environmental factors associated with adults‚Äô participation in physical activity A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 22(3):188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison R (1987) Ethnicity and urban recreation: whites, blacks and hispanics in chicago's public parks. Journal of Leisure Research 19:17

    Google Scholar 

  • ICMA, & NACO (2006). Active Living Approaches by Local Government.

  • Irwin EG (2002) The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 78(4):465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin EG, Bockstael NE (2001) The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(3):698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczynski A, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE (2008) Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. American Journal of Public Health 98(8):1451–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczynski AT, Havitz ME (2009) Examining the relationship between proximal park features and residents’ physical activity in neighborhood parks. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration 27(3):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn EB, Ramsey L, Brownson RC (2002) The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 22(4S):73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CW, Phipps TT, Anselin L (2003) Measuring the Benefits of Air Quality Improvement: A Spatial Hedonic Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45:15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim T-H, Muller C (2004) Two-stage quantile regression when the first stage is based on quantile regression. [10.1111/j.1368-423X.2004.00128.x]. Econometrics Journal 7(1):218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Hallock KF (2001) Quantile Regression. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4):143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuethe TH, Keeney R (2012) Environmental externalities and residential property values: externalized costs along the house price distribution. Land Economics 88(2):241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to Spatial Econometrics: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liao W-C, Wang X (2012) Hedonic house prices and spatial quantile regression. Journal of Housing Economics 21(1):16–27. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2011.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin I-H, Wu C, De Sousa C (2013) Examining the economic impact of park facilities on neighboring residential property values. Applied Geography 45:322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukaitou-Sideris A, Sideris A (2009) What brings children to the park? Analysis and measurement of the variables affecting children's use of parks. Journal of the American Planning Association 76(1):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, C. (2011). unknown--a work in progress.

  • More TA, Stevens TH, Allen PG (1982) The economics of urban parks: a benefit/cost analysis. Parks Recreation 17(8):31

    Google Scholar 

  • More TA, Stevens TH, Allen PG (1988) Valuation of urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 15(1–2):139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowen A, Orsega-Smith E, Payne L, Ainsworth B, Godbey G (2007) The role of park proximity and social support in shaping park visitation, physical activity, and perceived health among older adults. Journal of Physical Activity & Health 4(2):167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowen AJ, Kyle GT, Borrie WT, Graefe AR (2006) Public response to park and recreation funding and costsaving strategies: the role of organizational trust and commitment. [Article]. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration 24(3):72–95

    Google Scholar 

  • National Physical Activity Plan (2010). http://www.physicalactivityplan.org/parks.php.

  • Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008 (2008). In P. A. G. A. Committee (Ed.). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Pratt M, Macera MA, Wang G (2000) Higher direct medical costs associated with physical inactivity. Physician Sportsmed 28:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. The Journal of Political Economy 82(1):34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 25(2)

  • Shores KA, West ST (2006) The relative importance of individual and environmental attributes for active park use. In: Proceedings of the 2006 cooper institute conference on parks, Recreation and Public Health, Dallas, TX

  • Simon PA, Fielding J (2009) Establishing best practices for changing the built environment to promote physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 37(6):S448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SR2S (2010). Safe Routes to School. (Vol. 2010): National Center for Safe Routes to School.

  • Tinsley HEA, Tinsley DJ, Croskeys CE (2002) Park Usage, Social Milieu, and Psychosocial Benefits of Park Use Reported by Older Urban Park Users from Four Ethnic Groups. Leisure Sciences 24(2):199–218. doi:10.1080/01490400252900158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weicher JC, Zerbst RH (1973) The externalities of neighborhood parks: an empirical investigation. Land Economics 49(1):99

  • Zahirovic-Herbert V, Chatterjee S (2012) Historic preservation and residential property values: evidence from quantile regression. Urban Studies 49(2):369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zietz J, Zietz E, Sirmans G (2008) Determinants of house prices: a quantile regression approach. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 37(4):317–333. doi:10.1007/s11146-007-9053-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

We thank Wenyuan Yin and Christine Marx for outstanding GIS support.

Funding

This study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Active Living Research (RWJ 68501)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tammy Leonard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leonard, T., Zhang, L. & Hoehner, C. Variations in Park Facility Valuations across Neighborhoods. Appl. Spatial Analysis 8, 45–67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-014-9120-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-014-9120-4

Keywords

Navigation