Abstract
Many states and municipalities prohibit registered sex offenders from residing near schools or other places where children gather. Such residence restrictions are employed in order to prevent sex crimes against children by reducing sex offender access to possible victims. Although numerous academic studies suggest that residence restrictions fail to reduce crime rates or are otherwise inappropriate, the potential effectiveness of these policies has not thoroughly been evaluated from a spatial accessibility perspective. This study explores the spatial accessibility of sex offenders to public schools in a city with enforced residence restrictions, St. Louis, Missouri. The goal of the analysis is to examine how accessible schools are to sex offenders with a history of crimes against children or minors. Unlike previous studies, however, accessibility is measured not only near the place of residence but also during expected routine activities that occur away from the home, such as at the work place or during commutes. To accomplish this, methods of time geography are used to measure cumulative sex offender accessibility to schools based on the home and work addresses of registered individuals. Specifically, potential path trees are used to estimate sex offender access to schools given estimated daily travel budgets. The results show that, while few registered offenders in the city live near schools, nearly all are expected to come in close proximity to them either near the work place or during the expected journey to work. In the context of public policy, this suggests that—from a strictly spatial perspective—residence restriction laws are unlikely to achieve their goal of limiting sex offender access to school children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, J. C. (2011). Place a moratorium on the passage of sex offender residence restriction laws. Criminology and Public Policy, 10(2), 401–409.
Beauregard, E., & Leclerc, B. (2007). An application of the rational choice approach to the offending process of sex offenders: a closer look at the decision-making. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 115–133.
Beauregard, E., Rossmo, D. K., & Proulx, J. (2007). A descriptive model of the hunting process of serial sex offenders: a rational choice perspective. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 449–463.
Berenson, J. A., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2011). A geospatial analysis of the impact of sex offender residency restrictions in two New York counties. Law and Human Behavior, 35(3), 235–246.
Bernasco, W. (2010). A sentimental journey to crime: effects of residential history on crime location choice. Criminology, 48(2), 389–416.
Birgden, A., & Cucolo, H. (2011). The treatment of sex offenders: evidence, ethics, and human rights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23(3), 295–313.
Block, R., Galary, A., & Brice, D. (2007). The journey to crime: victims and offenders converge in violent index offences in Chicago. Security Journal, 20(2), 123–137.
Bonnar-Kidd, K. K. (2010). Sexual offender laws and prevention of sexual violence or recidivism. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 412–419.
Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1984). Environmental criminology. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
Doren, D. M. (1998). Recidivism base rates, predictions of sex offender recidivism, and the “sexual predator” commitment laws. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 16, 97–114.
Downs, J. A., & Horner, M. W. (2012). Probabilistic potential path trees for visualizing and analyzing vehicle tracking data. Journal of Transport Geography, 23, 72–80.
Downs, J., Horner, M., & Tucker, A. (2011). Time-geographic density estimation for home range analysis. Annals of GIS, 37–41.
Downs, J. A., Horner, M. W., Hyzer, G., Lamb, D., & Loraamm, R. (2014). Voxel-based probabilistic space-time prisms for analysing animal movements and habitat use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28, 875–890.
Durling, C. (2006). Comment never going home: does it make us safer? Does it make sense? Sex offenders, residency restrictions, and reforming risk. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97(1), 317–364.
Farley, J. E. (1983). Metropolitan housing segregation in 1980: the St. Louis case. Urban Affairs Review, 18, 347–359.
Farley, J. E. (1995). Race still matters: the minimal role of income and housing cost as causes of housing segregation in St. Louis, 1990. Urban Affairs Review, 31, 244–254.
Farley, J. E. (2005). Race, not class: explaining racial housing segregation in the St. Louis Metropolitan Area, 2000. Sociological Focus, 38, 133–150.
Griggs, B. (2010). Homeless is not an address: states need to explore housing options for sex offenders. UMKC Law Review, 79, 757–773.
Grubesic, T. H. (2010). Sex offender clusters. Applied Geography, 30(1), 2–18.
Grubesic, T. H., & Mack, E. A. (2010). Sex offenders and residential location: a predictive-analytical framework. Environment and Planning A, 42(8), 1925–1942.
Grubesic, T., & Murray, A. (2010). Methods to support policy evaluation of sex offender laws. Papers in Regional Science, 89(3), 669–684.
Grubesic, T. H., Murray, A. T., & Mack, E. A. (2011). Sex offenders, residence restrictions, housing, and urban morphology: a review and synthesis. Cityscape, 13, 7–31.
Guay, J.-P., Proulx, J., Cusson, M., & Ouimet, M. (2001). Victim-choice polymorphia among serious sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 521–533.
Horner, M. W. (2004). Exploring metropolitan accessibility and urban structure. Urban Geography, 25(3), 264–284.
Horner, M. W., & Downs, J. A. (2014). Integrating people and place: a density-based measure for assessing accessibility to opportunities. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(2), 23–40.
Hughes, L. A., & Burchfield, K. B. (2008). Sex offender residence restrictions in Chicago: an environmental injustice? Justice Quarterly, 25(4), 647–673.
ICAA (2006). Iowa County Attorneys Association statement on sex offender residency restrictions in Iowa, January 20, 2006.
Kubrin, C. E. (2003). Structural covariates of homicide rates: does type of homicide matter? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 139–170.
Kubrin, C. E., & Herting, J. R. (2003). Neighborhood correlates of homicide trends: an analysis using growth-curve modeling. Sociological Quarterly, 44, 329–350.
Kubrin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003). Retaliatory homicide: concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood culture. Social Problems, 50, 157–180.
Kuijpers, B., Miller, H. J., Neutens, T., & Othman, W. (2010). Anchor uncertainty and space-time prisms on road networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(8), 1223–1248.
Kuijpers, B., Grimson, R., & Othman, W. (2011). An analytic solution to the alibi query in the space–time prisms model for moving object data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(2), 293–322.
Kwan, M. (1999). Gender, the home work link, and space‐time patterns of nonemployment activities. Economic Geography, 75, 370–394.
Langan, P., & Levin, D. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 1–16.
Langan, P., Schmitt, E., & Durose, M. (2003). Recidivism of sex offenders released from prison in 1994. Bureau of Justice Statistics Report NCJ 193427, 1–49
Levenson, J. S. (2008). Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Studies, 21(2), 153–166.
Levenson, J. S., & Brannon, Y. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161.
Levenson, J., Zgoba, K., & Tewksbury, R. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions-sensible policy or flawed logic. Federal Probation, 71(3), 2–9.
Lieb, R., Quinsey, V., & Berliner, L. (1998). Sexual predators and social policy. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice (pp. 43–114). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Maghelal, P., & Olivares, M. (2003). Critical risk zones: Violators of Megan’s law. College Station: Texas A&M University.
Mancini, C., Shields, R., Mears, D., & Beaver, K. (2010). Sex offender residence restriction laws: parental perceptions and public policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1022–1030.
Mares, D. (2013). Climate change and crime: monthly temperature and precipitation anomalies and crime rates in St. Louis, MO 1990–2009. Crime, Law and Social Change, 59, 185–208.
Meloy, M. L., Miller, S., & Curtis, K. (2008). Making sense out of nonsense: the deconstruction of state-level sex offender residence restrictions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 209–222.
Messner, S. F., Anselin, L., Baller, R. D., Hawkins, D. F., Deane, G., & Tolnay, S. E. (1999). The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: an application of exploratory spatial data analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 423–450.
Miller, H. J. (2005a). Necessary space—time conditions for human interaction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(3), 381–401.
Miller, H. J. (2005b). A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis, 37(1), 17–45.
Mingche, S., Hanyu, L., Yiming, Q., & Xiaohang, Z. (2011). Crime location prediction based on the maximum-likelihood theory. ICAIC, Part V, CCIS 228, 21–29.
Murray, A. T., Grubesic, T. H., Wei, R., & Mack, E. A. (2011). A hybrid geocoding methodology for spatio-temporal data. Transactions in GIS, 15(6), 795–809.
Murray, A. T., Grubesic, T. H., Mack, E. A., Wei, R., Rey, S. J., Anselin, L., & Griffin, M. L. (2013). Convicted sex offender residential movements. In Crime modeling and mapping using geospatial technologies (pp. 51–71). Netherlands: Springer.
Neutens, T., Weghe, N., Witlox, F., & Maeyer, P. (2008). A three-dimensional network-based space–time prism. Journal of Geographical Systems, 10(1), 89–107.
Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., & Witlox, F. (2011). The prism of everyday life: towards a new research agenda for time geography. Transport Reviews, 31(1), 25–47.
Neutens, T., Delafontaine, M., Scott, D. M., & De Maeyer, P. (2012). An analysis of day-to-day variations in individual space–time accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 23, 81–91.
Nieto, M., & Jung, D. (2006). The impact of residency restrictions on sex offenders and correctional management practices: A literature review (pp. 1–6). Sacramento: Califonia Research Bureau.
Okabe, A., Boots, B., Sugihara, K., & Chiu, S. N. (2000). Spatial tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi diagrams. Series in probability and statistics. Wiley.
Ratcliffe, J. H. (2006). A temporal constraint theory to explain opportunity-based spatial offending patterns. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(3), 261–291.
Rey, S. J., Murray, A. T., Grubesic, T. H., Mack, E., Wei, R., Anselin, L., & Griffin, M. (2014). Sex offender residential movement patterns: a Markov chain analysis. The Professional Geographer, 66(1), 102–111.
Roongpiboonsopit, D., & Karimi, H. A. (2010). Comparative evaluation and analysis of online geocoding services. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24, 1081–1100.
Rosenfeld, R., & Lauritsen, R. (2008). The most dangerous crime rankings. Contexts, 7(1), 66–67.
Ross, S. (2011). Do new statutory obligations imposed on sex offenders violate the Missouri constitutional principle forbidding retrospective. Rutgers Law Journal, 841(2002), 1093–1114.
Rountree, P. W., & Land, K. C. (2000). The generalizability of multilevel models of burglary victimization: a cross-city comparison. Social Science Research, 29, 284–305.
Socia, K. M. (2012). The implementation of county residence restrictions in New York. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(2), 206–230.
Tewksbury, R. (2007). Exile at home: the unintended collateral consequences of sex offender residency restrictions. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 15.
Tewksbury, R. (2011). Policy implications of sex offender residence restrictions laws. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(2), 345–348.
Tewksbury, R. (2012). A longitudinal examination of sex offender recidivism prior to and following the implementation of SORN. Behavioral Sciences, 328, 308–328.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders: an examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 61–75.
Wagner, C. (2010). Good left undone: how to stop sex offender laws from causing unnecessary harm at the expense of effectiveness. The American Journal of Criminal Law, 38, 263–289.
Watkins, A. M., & Decker, S. H. (2007). Patterns of homicide in East St. Louis. Homicide Studies, 11, 30–49.
White, K. (2008). Where will they go-sex offender residency restrictions as modern-day banishment. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 59, 161–190.
Youstin, T. J., & Nobles, M. R. (2009). Residency restrictions: a geospatial analysis of sex offender movement over time. Crime Mapping: A Journal of Research and Practice, 1(1), 55–76.
Zgoba, K. M. (2011). Residence restriction buffer zones and the banishment of sex offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 10(2), 391–400.
Zlatkovich, E. (2009). Constitutionality of sex offender residency restrictions: a takings analysis. The Review of Litigation, 29, 65–119.
Acknowledgments
Portions of this research were funded by grants made to the authors from the National Science Foundation (NSF) [grant number BCS-1062947]. The contents of this article are the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of the NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Downs, J.A. Using Potential Path Trees to Map Sex Offender Access to Schools. Appl. Spatial Analysis 7, 381–394 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-014-9116-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-014-9116-0