Skip to main content
Log in

The TTK chitra heart valve—A single centre experience with midterm results

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Chitra TTK heart valve has been in use at G.K.N.M. Hospital, Coimbatore, as the valve of choice. Initially this valve was used as part of a multi-centric trial and later it was the valve of choice in our institution.

Methods

Between December 1992 and July 1998, a total of 152 Chitra valves were implanted and these form the basis of this study. There were 65 aortic and 64 mitral implants and the rest were double valves.

Results

There was one early death due to infective endocarditis. There were 7 late deaths, 3 in aortic group (mean interval after surgery being 18.6 months), 3 in mitral group (interval of 8.6 months) and 1 in double valve group (interval of 7 months). The cause of the late deaths included endocarditis in 2 patients and choked valve in 2 patients. In the rest, the cause of death could not be ascertained. The remaining 144 patients were followed up (a total of 622 patient years of follow-up) with clinical and echocardiographic evaluation. There were 11 patients (7.2%) with thrombo-embolic episodes, 5 of whom had major events and the rest were minor with a linearized rate of 1.8 percent patient year. Haemodynamic studies in postoperative patients were comparable to other prosthetic valves. The thrombo-embolism free survival was 82% at 5 years. The actuarial survival was 78% at 5 years.

Conclusion

The Chitra valve is comparable to other mechanical valves

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nasir Khan. The relief of mitral stenosis—an historic step in cardiac surgery. Texas Heart Inst Journal 1996;23: 258–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhuvaneshwar GS, Muraleedharan CV, Arthun Vijayan C, Sankarkumar R and Valiathan MS. Development of he Chitra Tilting Disc Heart Valve Prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 1996; 5: 448–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Edmunds LH (Jr.), Clarke RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller C and Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thor Surg 1996; 112: 708–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ibrahim M, Cleland J, O'Kane H, Gladstone D, Mulholland C, Craig B. The St. Jude Medical prosthesis: a thirteen year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108: 221–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao S, Kurian VM, Ghosh M, Sankar Kumar R, Mohansingh MP, Valiathan MS. Clinical course after mitral valve replacement. Indian Heart Journal 1990; 42(5): 335–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiore AC, Barner HB, Swartz MT et al. Mitral valve replacement: Randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic Hall prosthesis. Ann Thor Surg 1998; 66: 707–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vallejo JL, Gonzalez-Santos JM, Albertos J et al. Eight years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve prothesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 50: 429–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Antunes MJ, Wessels A, Sadowski RG et al. Medtronic Hall replacement in a third-world population group. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 95: 980–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Arom KV, Nicoloff DM, Kersten TE et al. Ten years' experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1989; 47: 831–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Nagarajan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagarajan, M., Muralidharan, S. & Chandrasekar, P. The TTK chitra heart valve—A single centre experience with midterm results. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 16, 85–89 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-000-0017-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-000-0017-2

Keywords

Navigation