Abstract
India is a fast growing economy with a fast growing population. Estimations indicate that in the next few years, it will be the world’s most populous country, with China only second. These developments, together with high urbanization rates, are putting increasing pressure on the energy sector and driving the attention to energy efficiency. The issue is not only financial but also social and environmental. One of the schemes developed to promote energy efficiency in the residential housing sector is the Super Efficient Equipment Program (SEEP), which aims at reducing energy consumption in Indian households, by subsidizing the production of super efficient fans. Emphasis is put into increasing economies of scale and balancing possible losses in market power for producers. However, the scheme does not take into consideration consumers’ behavior in the market and their purchasing propensity toward energy efficient fans. In this article, we develop an econometric model that takes consumers’ preferences and behavior into consideration, by analyzing how these influence the success of the SEEP scheme. To do so, the price elasticity of energy efficient fans is calculated. We will then apply it to the SEEP subsidy scheme in order to assess how the quantity of super efficient fans sold varies with changes in the price. Using projected data on residential housing floor space in India, we will estimate the percentage of super efficient fans sold and calculate future energy savings. We are finally able to infer whether the SEEP scheme is capable of meeting its goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Indian Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/site/home.aspx
The Centred Moving Average is a method used to de-seasonalize time series. Analytically, it is of the form:
$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} CMA_{t}= \frac{y_{t-\frac{m}{2}}+2\left( y_{t-\frac{m}{2}+1} + {\dots} + y_{t}+\dots+y_{t-\frac{m}{2}-1}\right)+ y_{t-\frac{m}{2}}}{2m} \end{array} $$(2)where m = 10 years represents the length of the moving average and y t the observation at time t.
To be precise, in order to take inflation away from the time series, the minimum between the inflation rate and the Consumer Price Index for electric fans has been removed from the price.
As of end 2012, Government and Commercial Buildings accounted for about 800 million sq.m of floor space. Source: USAID ECO-III Project.
As an example, 81.8 % of urban households and 34.8 % of rural households have an electric fan, as of 2012 (Chaturvedi et al. 2014b).
As there is a cap to the maximum subsidy obtainable by a producer, there will be no incentive to bear extra production costs.
This assumption is also made by the SEEP Scheme.
Meaning that no fraction of the subsidy is used to reduce costs that are not related to the production of energy efficient fans
Ministry of Statistics of India, 2011
While being in line with our findings for what concerns the urban households.
1 W = 0.000001 MW
“The program is voluntary and manufacturers will bid for the amount of financial incentive as well as the total production quota through a reverse bidding mechanism with a pre-specified cap. The bidding mechanism is developed to allow multiple winners. The incentive will be paid per unit super-efficient fan to the manufacturer after the product leaves the factory for the market. A strict Monitoring and Verification (M &V) mechanism will check the quality and quantity of ceiling fans sold under the program” (Chunekar and Singh 2013).
References
Asian Development Bank (2012). Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2012. Renouf Publishing Company Limited. http://books.google.co.jp/books?id=NrjbNAEACAAJ.
Balachandra, P. (2011). Modern energy access to all in rural India: an integrated implementation strategy. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7803–7814. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.026. Clean Cooking Fuels and Technologies in Developing Economies. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511007154.
Bhattacharyya, S.C. (2015). Influence of India’s transformation on residential energy demand. Applied Energy, 143, 228–237.
Brown, M. (1980). Bounds, inequalities, and monotonicity properties for some specialized renewal processes. The Annals of Probability, 8(2), 227–240. doi:10.1214/aop/1176994773.
Chakrabarti, S. (2013). Interrogating inclusive growth: formal-informal duality, complementarity, conflict. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(6), 1349–1379. doi:10.1093/cje/bet016. http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/content/37/6/1349.abstract.
Chaturvedi, A., Arora, R., Chaturvedi, B., & Short, A. (2014a). Light without the poison. Tech. rep., Deutsche Gesellschaft f\(\tilde {A}\frac {1}{4}\)r Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH and Chintan Environmental Research and Action Group. http://www.chintan-india.org/documents/research_and_reports/chintan-report-CFL-bulbs.pdf.
Chaturvedi, V., Eom, J., Clarke, L.E., & Shukla, P.R. (2014b). Long term building energy demand for india: disaggregating end use energy services in an integrated assessment modeling framework. Energy Policy, 64, 226–242. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.021. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151200986X.
Chunekar, A., & Singh, D. (2013). A guidebook on Super-Efficient equipment program (SEEP Tech. rep. Prayas Energy Group.
Claassen, A., Kim, S., & Vallarino, C. (1996). Review of fan life evaluation procedures. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 03(01), 75–96. doi:10.1142/S0218539396000077.
Climate Investment Funds (2011). Investment plan for India. Tech. rep., CTF Trust Fund Committee.
Climate Investment Funds (2013). Super-Efficient Equipment Program (SEEP) - Stakeholder’s Consultation. Tech. rep., CTF Trust Fund Committee. https://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/cif/sites/climateinvestmentfunds.org/files/Stakeholder%27s%20consultation%20ppt.pdf.
Fernando, A. (2009). Business ethics: an Indian perspective. Pearson Education. https://books.google.ch/books?id=A-k_uWkGCEUC.
Filippini, M., & Pachauri, S. (2004). Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households. Energy Policy, 32(3), 429–436. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00314-2.
Garnaik, S. (2011). National mission for enhanced energy efficiency. New Delhi: Bureau of Energy Efficiency http://moef.nic.in/downloads/others/Mission-SAPCC-NMEEE.pdf.
Gunatilake, H., Roland-Holst, D., & Sugiyarto, G. (2014). Energy security for India: biofuels, energy efficiency and food productivity. Energy Policy, 65, 761– 767.
Hirst, E., & Brown, M. (1990). Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3(4), 267–281. doi:10.1016/0921-3449(90)90023-W.
IPCC (2014). IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Climate change 2014. Tech. rep., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
James, K.S. (2011). India’s demographic change: opportunities and challenges. Science, 333(6042), 576–580. doi:10.1126/science.1207969. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6042/576.abstract.
Kim, S., Vallarino, C., & Claassen, A. (1996). Review of fan life evaluation procedures. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering.
Kumar, A., & Sharma, R. (1998). Managerial Economics. Atlantic Publishers & Distributors (P) Limited. https://books.google.ch/books?id=95xjd7_BBOsC.
Kumar, S. (2010). Improving Building Sector energy Efficiency in India: Strategies and Initiatives. Tech. rep., USAID Eco-III Project International Resources Group.
Liu, F., Meyer, A.S., & Hogan, J.F. (2010). Mainstreaming building energy efficiency codes in developing countries. World Bank Working Papers. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-8534-0.
Liu, Q., Steenburgh, T.J., & Gupta, S. (2015). The cross attributes flexible substitution logit: uncovering category expansion and share impacts of marketing instruments. Marketing Science, 34(1), 144–159. doi:10.1287/mksc.2014.0886.
Manu, S., Wong, J., Rawal, R., Thomas, P., Kumar, S., & Deshmukh, A. (2011). An initial parametric evaluation of the impact of the energy conservation building code of India on commercial building sector. In Proceedings of Building Simulation.
Mendenhall, W., & Sincich, T. (2007). Statistics for engineering and the sciences. Pearson Prentice-Hall. http://books.google.ch/books?id=DPcYAQAAIAAJ.
Nataraj, S. (2011). The impact of trade liberalization on productivity: evidence from India’s formal and informal manufacturing sectors. Journal of International Economics, 85(2), 292–301. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.07.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199611000808.
Pachauri, S. (2004). An analysis of cross-sectional variations in total household energy requirements in India using micro survey data. Energy Policy, 32(15), 1723–1735. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00162-9.
Phadke, A.A., Abhyankar, N., & Shah, N. (2014). Avoiding 100 new power plants by increasing efficiency of room air conditioners in India: opportunities and challenges.
Reddy, B.S., & Shrestha, R.M. (1998). Barriers to the adoption of efficient electricity technologies: a case study of India. International Journal of Energy Research, 22(3), 257–270. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-114X(19980310)22:3%3C257:AID-ER358%3E3.0.CO;2-C.
van Ruijven, B.J., van Vuuren, D.P., de Vries, B.J., Isaac, M., van der Sluijs, J.P., Lucas, P.L., & Balachandra, P. (2011). Model projections for household energy use in India. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7747–7761. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.021. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511007105.
Shukla, P.R., & Chaturvedi, V. (2013). Sustainable energy transformations in India under climate policy. Sustainable Development, 21(1), 48–59.
Sinha, A. (2015). Modeling energy efficiency and economic growth: evidences from India. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(1), 96–104. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eco:journ2:2015-01-08 http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eco:journ2:2015-01-08.
Tavner, P.J., Xiang, J., & Spinato, F. (2007). Reliability analysis for wind turbines. Wind Energy, 10(1), 1–18. doi:10.1002/we.204.
Taylor, M., & Fujita, K.S. (2012). Program potential: estimates of federal energy cost savings from energy efficient procurement.
Taylor, R.P., Govindarajalu, C., Levin, J., Meyer, A.S., & Ward, W.A. (2008). Financing Energy Efficiency: Lessons from Brazil, China, India, and Beyond. World Bank e-Library, World Bank, http://books.google.ch/books?id=-LfWLpkmkCcC.
World Health Organization (2012). World Health Statistics 2012. Nonserial Publication Series, World Health Organization. http://books.google.co.jp/books?id=Z69vxfRfFIsC.
Zacks, S., & Even, M. (1966). The efficiencies in small samples of the maximum likelihood and best unbiased estimators of reliability functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61(316), 1033–1051. doi:10.1080/01621459.1966.10482193.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Prof. Marc Chesney from the University of Zurich, Switzerland, for the unwavering support. Many thanks go to Magnus Bengtsson and Lewis Akenji from the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan, for their time and their precious comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
No conflict of interest has arisen while drafting the following research article. No conflict of interest has arisen before or will arise afterwards.
Consent for publication
No research activities involving Human Participants and/or other Animals have been or will be undertaken.
All the people and institutions of interest have been promptly informed.
A: Test statistics
A: Test statistics
A.1 Dickey-fuller unit-Root and normality tests for regressions
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Troja, B. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the super-efficient equipment program subsidy in India. Energy Efficiency 9, 1385–1404 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9429-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9429-8