Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Greenfield settlements due to tunnelling using tunnel boring machine (TBM) in layered soils: a parametric study

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As India’s cities continue to increase in population, a large number of new metro lines are being built to accommodate the mobility of residents. For construction of these metro lines, underground tunnels are being constructed to alleviate traffic problems in congested areas such as Delhi, Chennai, Mumbai, etc., where land scarcity is a major issue. Although tunnel boring machines (TBMs) are used in the construction of metro tunnels, ground settlements on the surface are inevitable. Tunnelling induced ground settlements may have adverse impact on the structures that are above the ground level as well as adjacent to the excavations. In the present study, ground settlements caused by TBM tunnelling are determined in greenfield conditions, using a finite element method (FEM) based software, PLAXIS and parametric study is performed after validation of numerical model with empirical results. Ground settlements obtained using PLAXIS 2D are compared with those obtained using empirical methods as available in literature. This study captures the effect of governing tunnel and soil parameters such as diameter of tunnel (D), depth of the tunnel axis from ground surface (z), grout pressure (GP), undrained shear strength of soil (su) and soil modulus (E’ref), covering the most practical range, on ground settlements under greenfield condition. The settlement results of this study are validated and compared closely with earlier experimental and observational findings that have been published in the literature. It is observed from the various parameters studied that they are having a major impact on the ground settlements during tunnel construction. Therefore, a tunnel designer should consider the effect of all the governing factors in design prior to the tunnel construction to keep the maximum surface settlements within the permissible limit set by the standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Athar M F, Sadique M R, Alsabhan A H and Alam S 2022 Ground Settlement Due to Tunneling in Cohesionless Soil. Appl. Sci. 12: 3672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Loganathan N, Poulos H G and Stewart D P 2000 Centrifuge model testing of tunnelling-induced ground and pile deformations. Geotechnique 50: 283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobsz S W, Standing J R, Mair R J, Hagiwara T and Sugiyama T 2004 Centrifuge modelling of tunnelling near driven piles. Soils and Foundations 44: 49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall A M, Farrell R, Klar A and Mair R 2012 Tunnels in sands: the effect of size, depth and volume loss on greenfield displacements. Géotechnique 62: 385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vorster T E B, Klar A, Soga K and Mair R J 2005 Estimating the Effects of Tunneling on Existing Pipelines. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131: 1399–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verruijt A and Booker J R 1996 Surface settlements due to deformation of a tunnel in an elastic half Plane. Géotechnique 46: 753–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loganathan N and Poulos H G 1998 Analytical prediction for tunnelling induced ground movements in clays. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124: 846–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu J, Yang J, Klapperich H and Wang S 2016 Analytical prediction of ground movements due to a nonuniform deforming tunnel. Int. J. Geomech. 16: 04015089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lai H, Zhang J, Zhang L, Chen R and Yang W 2019 A New Method based on Centrifuge Model Test for Evaluating Ground Settlement Induced by Tunnelling. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 23: 2426–2436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong X, Zhang D and Sun Z 2023 Mechanical responses of multi-layered ground due to shallow tunnelling with arbitrary ground surface load. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering. 17: 745–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun F, Jin Z, Wang C, Gou C, Li X, Liu C and Yu Z 2023 Case Study on Tunnel Settlement Calculations during Construction Considering Shield Disturbance. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 27: 2202–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Möller S C and Vermeer P A 2008 On numerical simulation of tunnel installation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 23: 461–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mathew G V and Lehane B M 2013 Numerical back-analyses of greenfield settlement during tunnel boring. Can. Geotech. J. 50: 145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathew G V and Lehane B M 2014 Measured and Back Analysed Soil Structure Interaction Effects in a Layered Stratigraphy During Tunnel Boring. Geotech Geol. Eng. 32: 873–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng G, Lu P and Diao Y 2015 Advance speed-based parametric study of greenfield deformation induced by EPBM tunnelling in soft ground. Computers and Geotechnics 65: 220–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Golpasand M R B, Nikudel M R and Uromeihy A 2016 Specifying the real value of volume loss (VL) and its effect on ground settlement due to excavation of Abuzar tunnel, Tehran. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 75: 485–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miliziano S and Lillis A D 2019 Predicted and observed settlements induced by the mechanized tunnel excavation of metro line C near S. Giovanni station in Rome. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 86: 236–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shiau J and Sams M 2019 Relating volume loss and greenfield settlement. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 83: 145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanagaraju R and Krishnamurthy P 2020 Influence of Tunneling in Cohesionless Soil for Different Tunnel Geometry and Volume Loss under Greenfield Condition. Advances in Civil Engineering 1–11

  20. Rezaei A H and Adli M A 2020 The Volume Loss: Real Estimation and Its Effect on Surface Settlements Due to Excavation of Tabriz Metro Tunnel. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 38: 2663–2684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aswathy M S, Vinoth M and Mittal A 2022 Impact of Governing Factors on Prediction of Tunneling Induced Surface Settlement in Young Alluvium Deposit. Indian Geotech. J. 52: 13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed K S, Sharmin J and Ansary M A 2023 Numerical investigation of tunneling induced surface movement: A case study of MRT Line 1. Dhaka. Underground Space. 12: 116–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Omari R R, Al-Soud M S and Al-Zuhairi O I 2019 Effect of Tunnel Progress on the Settlement of Existing Piled Foundation. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 41: 102–113

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Islam M S and Iskander M 2021 Twin tunnelling induced ground settlements: A review. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 110: 103614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. EIMouchi A M, Hassan A M and Amer M I 2018 Performance of an existing raft foundation rested on granular soils due to TBM tunnelling process. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 11: 108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peck R B 1969 Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, State-of-the-art Volume, pp. 225–290

  27. Attewell P B and Farmer I W 1974 Ground disturbance caused by shield tunnelling in a stiff, overconsolidated clay. Engineering Geology 8: 361–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vu M N, Broere W and Bosch J 2016 Volume loss in shallow tunnelling. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 59: 77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dias T G S and Bezuijen A 2015 TBM Pressure Models – Observations, Theory and Practice. In: Proceedings of 15th Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering - Geotechnical Synergy in Buenos Aires, pp. 347–374

  30. Wu H N, Shen S L and Yang J 2017 Identification of Tunnel Settlement Caused by Land Subsidence in Soft Deposit of Shanghai. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31: 04017092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. The Metro Railguy Home page https://themetrorailguy.com/delhi-meerut-rrts-information-route-maps-fares-tenders-updates/, Last accessed 03/03/2023

  32. BidAssist Home page https://bidassist.com/delhi-tenders/national-capital-region-transport-corporation/detail-2a42fa4a-5b37-46b5-98b1-7e3bdeb4585b, Last accessed 05/05/2022

  33. Clayton C R 1995 The standard penetration test (SPT): methods and use. Construction Industry Research and Information Association. 143

  34. Bowles J E 1988 Geotechnical and index properties: laboratory testing; settlement and strength correlations, Foundation analysis and design. 5th edition, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2: 123

  35. PLAXIS 2D- Tutorial Manual. Edition V22

  36. PLAXIS 2D- Reference Manual. Edition V22

  37. O’Reilly M and New B 1982 Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom: their magnitude and prediction. In: Proceedings of Tunnelling ’82, Brighton pp. 173–181

  38. Celestino T B, Gomes R A M P and Bortolucci A A 2000 Errors in Ground Distortions Due to Settlement Trough Adjustment. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 15: 97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee S W 2002 The use of compensation grouting in tunnelling: a case study. Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers- Geotechnical Engineering 155: 101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Obrzud R F and Truty A 2018 Introduction The hardening soil model - a practical guidebook. Z Soil.PC 100701 report. Switzerland: Zaca Service Ltd. pp. 2–10

  41. Fargnoli V, Boldini D and Amorosi A 2013 TBM tunnelling-induced settlements in coarse-grained soils: The case of the new Milan underground line 5. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 38: 336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jenck O and Dias D 2003 Numerical analysis of the volume loss influence on building during tunnel excavation. In: Proceedings of the third international FLAC Symposium- FLAC and FLAC3D Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada pp. 135–144

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Delhi Technological University, Shahbad Daulatpur Main Bawana Road, Delhi, 110042, India

    Jyoti Agarwal & Raju Sarkar

Authors
  1. Jyoti Agarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raju Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jyoti Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agarwal, J., Sarkar, R. Greenfield settlements due to tunnelling using tunnel boring machine (TBM) in layered soils: a parametric study. Sādhanā 49, 75 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02425-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02425-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation