Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The major players in adaptive immunity

1. Humoral immunity

  • General / Article
  • Published:
Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do we remain healthy, for the most parts, in the midst of an environment teeming with opportunistic and infectious microbes, potential carcinogens and allergens? The fact is that our immune system, by and large, does a fine job in protecting us. It is therefore important to understand the organization of the immune network, which is broadly categorized into two groups: innate and adaptive. Cells involved in innate immunity are the first to come into contact with invading microbes, similar to the border security force, and respond rapidly but in a non-specific manner. On the other hand, the cells involved in adaptive immunity are slower to respond but act in a very specific manner. Though the primary response is slow, the secondary response is much faster and demonstrates memory. This article will focus on some important features and key players involved in the adaptive immune response. The first part deals with the humoral immune response mediated mainly by immunoglobulins produced by the B cells. The second part deals with T cells, the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC)-encoded molecules, and Recombination Activating Genes (RAG) responsible for generating diverse B-cell receptors (BCR) and T-cell receptors (TCR). With the advent of newer and smarter infectious agents, it is important to understand the working of the immune network as more research in this area may facilitate the development of better protective strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Suggested Reading

  1. F M Burnet, The clonal selection theory of acquired immunity, pp.1–209, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T S Chang, B Glick, A R Winter, The significance of the bursa of Fabricius of chickens in antibody production., Poultry Sci. Vol.34, p.1187, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N Hozumi, S Tonegawa, Evidence for somatic rearrangement of immunoglobulin genes coding for variable and constant regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA., Vol.73, pp.3628–3632, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R M Zinkernagel and P C Doherty, Immunological surveillance against altered self components by sensitised T lymphocytes in lymphocytic choriomeningitis, Nature, Vol.251, pp.547–548, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P Bretscher and M Cohn, A theory of self-nonself discrimination, Science, Vol.169, pp.1042–1049, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J F Miller, Immunological function of the thymus, Lancet, Vol.2, pp.748–749, 1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipankar Nandi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmed, A., Saha, B., Patwardhan, A. et al. The major players in adaptive immunity. Reson 14, 455–471 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-009-0046-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-009-0046-0

Keywords

Navigation