Abstract
The phenomenological study of neutral heavy gauge boson (\(Z^{\prime }_{B-L}\)) of the minimal \(B-L\) extension was done in the context of the LHC, on the dimuon production channel. The study begins with the LEP-II constraints on \(Z'\) searches, and the dimuon events are simulated at the parton level at CM energies of 7 TeV and 8 TeV and studied with an integrated luminosity of 1.21 fb\(^{-1}\) and 20.5 fb\(^{-1}\) respectively. Later, the ATLAS detector-specific cuts unique to the muon pairs are imposed followed by the signal selection cuts on the invariant mass of the dimuon which restrict the events that are to be passed for signal-background analysis, that are finally compared with the ATLAS data, and accounted for no experimental detection of \(Z^{\prime }_{B-L}\) boson. It has been simulated further at 14 TeV CM energy with an integrated luminosity of 300 fb\(^{-1}\) to predict a possible discovery of this \(B-L\) neutral-heavy gauge boson with a mass corresponding to 1.5 TeV and a \(Z'\) coupling strength of 0.2 based on the signal-background analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L Basso, arXiv:1106.4462 [hep-ph]
A Biswas, S Choubey and S Khan, J. High Energy Phys. 1608, 114 (2016), doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)114, arXiv:1604.06566 [hep-ph]
M Klasen, F Lyonnet and F S Queiroz, arXiv:1607.06468 [hep-ph]
A Alves, A Berlin, S Profumo and F S Queiroz, J. High Energy Phys. 1510, 076 (2015), doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)076, arXiv:1506.06767 [hep-ph]
L Basso and G M Pruna, https://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/attachment/wiki/B-L-SM/B-L.fr
N D Christensen and C Duhr, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1614 (2009), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.02.018, arXiv:0806.4194 [hep-ph]
A Alloul, N D Christensen, C Degrande, C Duhr and B Fuks, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.04.012, arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph]
S Wolfram, Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 9.0, Champaign, IL (2012), https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/new-in-9/
C Degrande, C Duhr, B Fuks, D Grellscheid, O Mattelaer and T Reiter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1201 (2012), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.01.022, arXiv:1108.2040 [hep-ph]
J Alwall et al, J. High Energy Phys. 1407, 079 (2014), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-th]
E Conte, B Fuks and G Serret, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 222 (2013), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.009, arXiv:1206.1599 [hep-ph]
M Carena, A Daleo, B A Dobrescu and T M P Tait, Phys. Rev. D 70, 093009 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.093009, arXiv:hep-ph/0408098
J Alwall et al, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 300 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.11.010, arXiv:hep-ph/0609017
ATLAS Collaboration: G Aad et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 272002 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.272002, arXiv:1108.1582 [hep-ex]
ATLAS Collaboration: G Aad et al, Phys. Rev. D 90(5), 052005 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.052005, arXiv:1405.4123 [hep-ex]
J Alwall, M Herquet, F Maltoni, O Mattelaer and T Stelzer, J. High Energy Phys. 1106, 128 (2011), doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2011)128, arXiv:1106.0522 [hep-ph]
L Basso, A Belyaev, S Moretti and G M Pruna, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 259, 012062 (2010), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/259/1/012062, arXiv:1009.6095 [hep-ph]
L Basso, S Moretti and G M Pruna, J. Phys. G 39, 025004 (2012), doi:10.1088/0954-3899/39/2/025004, arXiv:1009.4164 [hep-ph]
C W Chiang, N D Christensen, G J Ding and T Han, Phys. Rev. D 85, 015023 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.015023, arXiv:1107.5830 [hep-ph]
R Contino, Nuovo Cimento B 123, 511 (2008), doi:10.1393/ncb/i2008-10553-3, arXiv:0804.3195 [hep-ph]
F Del Aguila, Acta Phys. Polon. B 25, 1317 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9404323
A Kundu and B Mukhopadhyaya, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11, 5221 (1996), doi:10.1142/S0217751X9600239X, arXiv:hep-ph/9507305
P Langacker, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 14, 15 (1995), doi:10.1142/9789814503662_0002, arXiv:hep-ph/0304186
P Langacker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1199 (2009), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1199, arXiv:0801.1345 [hep-ph]
T G Rizzo, AIP Conf. Proc. 542, 152 (2000), doi:10.1063/1.1336251, arXiv:hep-ph/0001140
J D Lykken, eConf C 960625, NEW140 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9610218
T G Rizzo, arXiv:hep-ph/0610104
M Perelstein, doi:10.1142/9789814327183_0008, arXiv:1002.0274 [hep-ph]
N Okada and S Okada, Phys. Rev. D 93(7), 075003 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.075003, arXiv:1601.07526 [hep-ph]
Yu Ya Komachenko and M Yu Khlopov, Yadernaya Fizika (1990) 51, 1081 (1990), [English translation: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51(4), 692 (1990)]
S Banerjee, M Mitra and M Spannowsky, Phys. Rev. D 92(5), 055013 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.055013, arXiv:1506.06415 [hep-ph]
Acknowledgements
This study of \(Z'_{B-L}\) was carried out as a dissertation thesis of M.Sc. Particle Physics programme, under the guidance of Dr Sebastian Jäger, University of Sussex, UK. The author expresses his sincere thanks and gratitude to his thesis adviser. He would like to thank the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL), Ahmedabad for hospitality and support during which he got an opportunity to present this work in the Pheno01@IISERMohali workshop. He is grateful to the organisers of Pheno01@IISERMohali workshop for supporting his stay at the IISER-Mohali, India. The final part of this work in preparing the manuscript was done during his visiting tenure in Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI), India. The author is extending his sincere gratitude to Prof. Biswarup Mukhopadhyaya, and the Regional Centre for Accelerator-based Particle Physics (RECAPP)-HRI for supporting him and his learning process.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Comparison of 7, 8 and 14 TeV simulated datasets
Appendix A: Comparison of 7, 8 and 14 TeV simulated datasets
The event distribution of the remaining datasets studied at 7, 8 and 14 TeV are compared in this Appendix (figures 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 corresponding to datasets B, C, D, E and F respectively). All the cases of Appendix A correspond to experimentally ruled out possibilities as the confidence level (CL) of all the cases are less than \(3 \sigma \).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balasubramaniam, K.M. Phenomenological study of \(Z'\) in the minimal \(B-L\) model at LHC. Pramana - J Phys 89, 52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-017-1451-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-017-1451-7
Keywords
- Dataset-specific parameters
- LEP-II constraints
- detector-specific kinematic cuts
- signal-specific kinematic cuts
- \({Z'_{B-L}}\) boson
- heavy resonance
- dimuon production channel
- LHC
- ATLAS