Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Opportunities and problems in determining proton and light nuclear radii

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We briefly review the so-called ‘proton puzzle’, i.e., the disagreement of the newly extracted value of the proton charge radius r p from muonic hydrogen spectroscopy with other extractions, its possible significance and related problems. After describing the conventional theory to extract the proton radius from atomic spectroscopy we focus on a novel consistent approach based on the Breit equation. With this new tool, we confirm that the radius has indeed become smaller compared to the value extracted from scattering experiments, but the existence of different theoretical approaches casts some doubt on the accuracy of the new value. Precision measurements in atomic physics do provide the opportunity to extract light nuclear radii but the accuracy is limited by the methods of incorporating the nuclear structure effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Matveev et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 230801 (2013)

  2. P E Bosted et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3841 (1992) J Friedrich and Th Walcher, Eur. Phys. J. A 17, 607 (2003) C F Perdrisat, V Punjabi and M Vanderhaeghen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 694 (2007)

  3. R Pohl et al, Nature 466, 213 (2010)

  4. P J Mohr, B N Taylor and D B Newell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 633 (2008)

  5. A Beyer et al, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 467, 012003 (2013)

  6. E Borie, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032508 (2005) E Borie, Ann. Phys. 327, 733 (2012) A P Martynenko, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022506 (2005) K Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2092 (1996) K Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3593 (1999)

  7. T Mart and A Sulaksono, Phys. Rev. C 87, 025807 (2013)

  8. T Teubner et al, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 225–227, 282 (2012) D Nomura and T Teubner, Nucl. Phys. B 867, 236 (2013) K Hagiwara et al, J. Phys. G 38, 085003 (2011) S Bodenstein, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28, 1360021 (2013) F Burger et al, J. High Energy Phys. 1402, 099 (2014) D Moricciani (on behalf of KLOE-2 and BGO-OD Collaborations), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 349, 012005 (2012)

  9. M Nowakowski, E A Paschos and J M Rodriguez, Eur. J. Phys. 26, 545 (2005)

  10. J L Friar, J Martorell and D W L Sprung, Phys. Rev. A 56, 4579 (1997)

  11. J J Kelly, Phys. Rev. C 66, 065203 (2002)

  12. F Garcia Daza, N G Kelkar and M Nowakowski, J. Phys. G 39, 035103 (2012)

  13. N G Kelkar, F Garcia Daza and M Nowakowski, Nucl. Phys. B 864, 382 (2012)

  14. I Sick, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 473 (2012)

  15. A Antognini et al, Science 339, 417 (2013)

  16. P J Mohr, B N Taylor and D B Newell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1527 (2012)

  17. C Adamuščin, S Dubnička and A Z Dubničková, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 479 (2012) J C Bernauer et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 242001 (2010) I T Lorenz, H-W Hammer and Ulf-G Meissner, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 151 (2012) C Adamuščin, E Bartoš, S Dubnička and A Z Dubničková, Nucl. Phys. B - Proc. Suppl. 245, 69 (2013)

  18. C Itzykson and J-B Zuber, Quantum field theory (Dover Books on Physics) (Dover Publications, 2006)

  19. J L Friar, Ann. Phys. 122, 151 (1979)

  20. I C Cloët and G A Miller, Phys. Rev. C 83, 012201(R) (2011)

  21. V B Berestetskii, E M Lifshitz and L P Pitaevskii, Quantum electrodynamics, in: Landau–Lifshitz course on theoretical physics 2nd edn (Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007) Vol. 4 H A Bethe and E E Salpeter, Quantum mechanics of one- and two-electron atoms (Dover, New York, 2008)

  22. M De Sanctis and P Quintero, Eur. Phys. J. A 46, 213 (2010) M De Sanctis, Eur. Phys. J. A 41, 169 (2009)

  23. A C Zemach, Phys. Rev. 104, 1771 (1956)

  24. A Antognini et al, Can. J. Phys. 89, 47 (2011) R Pohl, R Gilman, G A Miller and K Pachucki, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 175 (2013)

  25. M Nowakowski, N G Kelkar and T Mart, Phys. Rev. C 74, 024323 (2006) N G Kelkar and M Nowakowski, Phys. Lett. B 651, 363 (2007)

  26. R Gilman et al, Studying the proton radius puzzle with μp elastic scattering, preprint arXiv:1303.2160 (2013)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department de Fisica, Cra 1E, 18A-10, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia

    N G KELKAR, M NOWAKOWSKI & D BEDOYA FIERRO

Authors
  1. N G KELKAR
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M NOWAKOWSKI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D BEDOYA FIERRO
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N G KELKAR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

KELKAR, N.G., NOWAKOWSKI, M. & FIERRO, D.B. Opportunities and problems in determining proton and light nuclear radii. Pramana - J Phys 83, 761–771 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0875-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0875-6

Keywords

PACS Nos

Search

Navigation