Skip to main content
Log in

Stability of 244–260Fm isotopes against alpha and cluster radioactivity

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking Coulomb and proximity potentials as the interacting barrier we have studied the cold valley in the radioactive decay of 244–260Fm isotopes. It is found that in addition to alpha particle minima, other minima occur at S, Ar and Ca clusters. We have computed the half-lives and other characteristics of different clusters emitted from these parents treating parent, daughter and emitted cluster as spheres. Our study reveals that most of these parents are unstable against alpha and heavy cluster (46Ar, 48,50Ca) emissions and stable against light cluster emission, except 8Be from 244–248Fm isotopes. The most probable clusters from these parents are predicted to be 46Ar, 48,50Ca which indicate the role of doubly or near doubly magic clusters (Z = 20, N = 28) and also stress the role of doubly magic 208Pb daughter. The computed half-lives for alpha decay are in good agreement with the experimental data. It is found that the presence of neutron excess in the parent nuclei slows down the cluster decay process. The effect of quadrupole (β 2) and hexadecapole (β 4) deformations of parent and fragments on half-lives are also studied. It is found that inclusion of β 2 and β 4 reduces the height and shape of the barrier (increases barrier penetrability) and hence the half-life decreases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Sandulescu, D Poenaru and W Greiner, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. II, 528 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  2. R K Gupta, in Heavy elements and related new phenomena edited by W Greiner and R K Gupta (World Scientific Pub., Singapore, 1999) Vol. I, p. 536

    Google Scholar 

  3. H J Rose and G A Jones, Nature (London) 307, 245 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R Bonetti and A Guglielmetti, in: Heavy elements and related new phenomena edited by W Greiner and R K Gupta (World Scientific Pub., Singapore, 1999) Vol. II, p. 643

    Google Scholar 

  5. D N Poenaru, M Ivascu, A Sandulescu and W Greiner, J. Phys. G: Nucl Part. Phys. 10, L183 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. D N Poenaru, M Ivascu, A Sandulescu and W Greiner, Phys. Rev. C32, 572 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D N Poenaru, W Greiner, A Sandulescu and M Ivascu, Phys. Rev. C32, 2198 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. W Greiner, M Ivascu, D N Poenaru and A Sandulescu, Z. Phys. A320, 347 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y J Shi and W J Swiatecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 300 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A Sandulescu, D N Poenaru, W Greiner and J H Hamilton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 490 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. G A Pik-Pichak, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 44, 923 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. G Shanmugam and B Kamalaharan, Phys. Rev. C38, 1377 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. B Buck and A C Merchant, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 15, 615 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K P Santhosh and Antony Joseph, Ind. J. Pure & Appl. Phys. 42, 806 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. K P Santhosh and Antony Joseph, Pramana — J. Phys. 55, 375 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. G Royer, R K Gupta and V Yu Denisov, Nucl. Phys. A632, 275 (1998)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S Landowne and C H Dasso, Phys. Rev. C33, 387 (1986)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. M Iriondo, D Jerrestan and R J Liotta, Nucl. Phys. A454, 252 (1986)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R Blendoaske, T Fliessbach and H Walliser, Nucl. Phys. A464, 75 (1987)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S S Malik and R K Gupta, Phys. Rev. C39, 1992 (1989)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. S Kumar and R K Gupta, Phys. Rev. C55, 218 (1997)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M Jones, R P Schuman, J P Butler, G Cowper, T A Eastwood and H G Jackson, Phys. Rev. 102, 203 (1956)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. E K Hulet, R W Hoff, J E Evans and R W Lougheed, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 343 (1964)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. T Sikkeland, A Ghiorso, R Latimer and A E Larsh, Phys. Rev. 140, B277 (1965)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. K P Santhosh and Antony Joseph, Proc. Int. Natl. Symp. Nucl. Phys. (India) B43, 296 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. K P Santhosh and Antony Joseph, Pramana — J. Phys. 58, 611 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. K P Santhosh and Antony Joseph, Pramana — J. Phys. 62, 957 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. K P Santhosh, R K Biju, Sabina Sahadevan and Antony Joseph, Phys. Scr. 77, 065201 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. A Guglielmetti et al, Nucl. Phys. A583, 867c (1995)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. A Guglielmetti et al, Phys. Rev. C56, R2912 (1997)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. M La Commara et al, Nucl. Phys. A669, 43 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. K P Santhosh and Antony Joseph, Pramana — J. Phys. 59, 679 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. R K Biju, Sabina Sahadevan, K P Santhosh and Antony Joseph, Pramana — J. Phys. 70, 617 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. K P Santhosh, R K Biju and Antony Joseph, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35, 085102 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bir Bikram Singh, Sham K Arun, Manoj K Sharma, Shefali Kanwar and Raj K Gupta, Proc. DAE Symp. Nucl. Phys. (India) 53, 261 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sham K Arun and Raj K Gupta, Proc. DAE Symp. Nucl. Phys. (India) 52, 365 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. M K Sharma, B B Singh and R K Gupta, Proc. 11th Punjab Science Congress (2008) p. 40

  38. J Blocki, J Randrup, W J Swiatecki and C F Tsang, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 105, 427 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. J Blocki and W J Swiatecki, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 132, 53 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. C Y Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 766 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. N Malhotra and R K Gupta, Phys. Rev. C31, 1179 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. R K Gupta, M Balasubramaniam, R Kumar, N Singh, M Manhas and W Greiner, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31, 631 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Y J Shi and W J Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. A438, 450 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. G Audi, A H Wapstra and C Thivault, Nucl. Phys. A729, 337 (2003)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. H Koura, T Tachibana, M Uno and M Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 113, 305 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. G Royer, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 26, 1149 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. R K Gupta and W Greiner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E3, 335 (1994)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. P Moller, J R Nix, W D Myers and W J Swiatecki, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. S Wang, D Snowden-Ifft, P B Price, K J Moody and E K Hulet, Phys. Rev. C39, 1647 (1989)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. P. Santhosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santhosh, K.P., Biju, R.K. & Sahadevan, S. Stability of 244–260Fm isotopes against alpha and cluster radioactivity. Pramana - J Phys 73, 1059–1072 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-009-0166-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-009-0166-9

Keywords

Navigation