Abstract
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) has been cultivated since ancient times, but little is known about its genetic diversity and population structure. Examination of 80 date palm accessions grown in the United Arab Emirates, including a collection of varieties from around the world, using 21 microsatellite markers, indicated extensive genetic diversity, with many accessions heterozygous for most markers. The average number of alleles per locus (19), expected heterozygosity (0.7), observed heterozygosity (0.25) and fixation indices (Fst = 0.6, Rst = 0.72) demonstrated significant population structure. Analysis with a model-based Baysian method, STRUCTURE 2.4.1, indicated that the 80 accessions could be broadly divided into nine groups. Independent samples of genotypes with the same name, collected from different experimental stations, usually clustered together. The study was enriched for germplasm from the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and one STRUCTURE-derived grouping consisted mainly of UAE accessions. In a few other clusters, several genotypes from the UAE, Iraq and Oman grouped together. Two clusters included accessions from both North Africa and the Middle East. Many accessions in the STRUCTURE-derived populations appeared to be genetic admixtures. The results indicated a broad dissemination of related germplasms across date-palm growing regions of the world, with very few alleles that still correlate with particular regional germplasms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed TA, Al-Qaradawi AY (2009) Molecular phylogeny of Qatari date palm genotypes using simple sequence repeats markers. Biotechnology 8:126–131
Akkak A, Scariot V, Marinoni DT, Boccacci P, Beltramo C, Botta R (2009) Development and evaluation of microsatellite markers in Phoenix dactylifera L and their transferability to other Phoenix species. Biol Plant 53:164–166
Al-Dous EK, George B, Al-Mahmoud ME, Al-Jaber MY, Wang H, Salameh YM, Al-Azwani EK, Chaluvadi S, Pontaroli AC, DeBarry J, Arondel V, Ohlrogge J, Saie IJ, Suliman-Elmeer KM, Bennetzen JL, Kruegger RR, Malek JA (2011) De novo genome sequencing and comparative genomics of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera). Nat Biotechnol 29:521–527
Al-Ruqaishi IA, Davey M, Alderson P, Mayes S (2008) Genetic relationships and genotype tracing in date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L) in Oman, based on microsatellite markers. Plant Genet Resour 6:70–72
Austerlitz F, Mariette S, Machon N, Gouyon PH, Godelle B (2000) Effects of colonization processes on genetic diversity: differences between annual plants and tree species. Genetics 154:1309–1321
Bashah M (1996) Date variety in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In: King Abdulaziz Univ guidance booklet palms and dates. King Abdul Aziz Univ Press, Riyadh, pp 1225–1319
Besnard G, El Bakkali A, Haouane H, Baali-Cherif D, Moukhli A, Khadari B (2013) Population genetics of Mediterranean and Saharan olives: geographic patterns of differentiation and evidence for early generations of admixture. Ann Bot 112:1293–1302
Billotte N, Marseillac N, Brottier P, Noyer JL, Jacquemoud-Collet JP, Moreau C, Couvreur T, Chevallier MH, Pintaud JC, Risterucci AM (2004) Nuclear microsatellite markers for the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L): characterization and utility across the genus Phoenix and in other palm genera. Mol Ecol Notes 4:256–258
Brown TA, Jones MK, Powell W, Allaby RG (2009) The complex origins of domesticated crops in the Fertile Crescent. Trends Ecol Evol 24:103–109
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AW (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233–257
Cornille A, Gladieux P, Smulders MJM, Roldan-Ruiz I, Laurens F, Le Cam B, Nersesyan A, Clavel J, Olonova M, Feugey L, Gabrielyan I, Zhang XG, Tenaillon MI, Giraud T (2012) New insight into the history of domesticated apple: secondary contribution of the European wild apple to the genome of cultivated varieties. PLoS Genet 8:e1002703
de Casas RR, Besnard G, Schonswetter P, Balaguer L, Vargas P (2006) Extensive gene flow blurs phylogeographic but not phylogenetic signal in Olea europaea L. Theor Appl Genet 113:575–583
Earl DA, Vonholdt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361
Elmeer K, Sarwath H, Malek J, Baum M, Hamwieh A (2011) New microsatellite markers for assessment of genetic diversity in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L). Biotech 1:91–97
Elshibli S, Korpelainen H (2008) Microsatellite markers reveal high genetic diversity in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L) germplasm from Sudan. Genetica 134:251–260
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491
Fki L, Bouaziz N, Kriaa W, Benjemaa-Masmoudi R, Gargouri-Bouzid R, Rival A, Drira N (2011) Multiple bud cultures of ‘Barhee’ date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) and physiological status of regenerated plants. J Plant Physiol 168:1694–1700
Ghaleb HHA (2008) Date palm cultivars atlas of United Arab Emirates. Zayed Center for Heritage and History, Al-Ain
Goldringer I, Prouin C, Rousset M, Galic N, Bonnin I (2006) Rapid differentiation of experimental populations of wheat for heading time in response to local climatic conditions. Ann Bot 98:805–817
Jaradat AA (2011) Biodiversity of date palm. Eolss Publishers, Oxford
Khanam S, Sham A, Bennetzen JL, Aly M (2012) Analysis of molecular marker-based characterization and genetic variation in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L). Aust J Crop Sci 6:1236–1244
Kriaa W, Sghaier-Hammami B, Masmoudi-Allouche F, Benjemaa-Masmoudi R, Drira N (2012) The date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L) micropropagation using completely mature female flowers. C R Biol 335:194–204
Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Beiles A, Nevo E (2002) Microsatellites: genomic distribution, putative functions and mutational mechanisms: a review. Mol Ecol 11:2453–2465
Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LE, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655
Miller AJ, Gross BL (2011) From forest to field: perennial fruit crop domestication. Am J Bot 98:1389–1414
Morrell PL, Buckler ES, Ross-Ibarra J (2011) Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat Rev Genet 13:85–96
Morris GP, Ramu P, Deshpande SP, Hash CT, Shah T, Upadhyaya HD, Riera-Lizarazu O, Brown PJ, Acharya CB, Mitchell SE, Harriman J, Glaubitz JC, Buckler ES, Kresovich S (2013) Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:453–458
Myles S, Boyko AR, Owens CL, Brown PJ, Grassi F, Aradhya MK, Prins B, Reynolds A, Chia JM, Ware D, Bustamante CD, Buckler ES (2011) Genetic structure and domestication history of the grape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:3530–3535
Nei M, Chakraborty R (1973) Genetic distance and electrophoretic identity of proteins between taxa. J Mol Evol 2:323–328
Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Lucas-Lledo JI, Warthmann N, Clark RM, Shaw RG, Weigel D, Lynch M (2010) The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 327:92–94
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 65: genetic analysis in Excel Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Rieseberg LH, Widmer A, Arntz AM, Burke JM (2002) Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:12242–12245
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234
Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462
Tanno K, Willcox G (2006) How fast was wild wheat domesticated? Science 311:1886
Wagner HW, Sefc KM (1999) IDENTITY 1.0. Centre for Applied Genetics, University of Agricultural Sciences Vienna
Wright S (1950) Genetical structure of populations. Nature 166:247–249
You FM, Huo N, Gu YQ, Luo MC, Ma Y, Hane D, Lazo GR, Dvorak J, Anderson OD (2008) BatchPrimer3: a high throughput web application for PCR and sequencing primer design. BMC Bioinforma 9:253
Zehdi S, Trifi M, Billotte N, Marrakchi M, Pintaud JC (2004) Genetic diversity of Tunisian date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L) revealed by nuclear microsatellite polymprohism. Hereditas 141:278–287
Zehdi S, Cherif E, Rhouma S, Santoni S, Hannachi AS, Pintaud JC (2012) Molecular polymorphism and genetic relationships in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L): the utility of nuclear microsatellite markers. Sci Hortic 148:255–263
Acknowledgments
This research was funded through UAE National Research Foundation (NRF) grant No. RSA - 1108 – 00479 (UAE University No. 31F002) and by endowment funds from the University of Georgia Giles Professorship and the Georgia Research Alliance. The authors highly appreciate the cooperation of the UAE Ministry of Environment and Water for providing the date palm samples from its research stations as well as the expertise of its scientists. The authors are grateful to undergraduate student Ms. Shamma Al-mansouri for her assistance in the lab work at UAE University and for providing date palm samples from her family’s private farm. The authors also thank Jeff Wagner at the University of Georgia for assistance with SSR gel analysis, and also Stephan Schroder and Katrien Devos for their assistance with analysis of SSR data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by: Hongwei Cai
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Fig. S1
Population structure analysis using STRUCTURE 2.40. A) Determination of the most appropriate value of K for STRUCTURE analysis of 75 samples of date palm collected from the UAE. Following analysis using STRUCTURE v 2.4, the best K value was calculated by Structure Harvester. B) Structure based neighbor joining tree showing relative distances between inferred clusters. C) Populations derived from STRUCTURE analysis are color-coded. Each accession is represented by a vertical bar, each of which is marked to denote place of initial collection. Iraq (I), Iran (N), Oman (O), Saudi Arabia (S) and UAE (U). Wherever, there was confusion about place of origin in the literature (Ghaleb 2008), multiple countries of origin are indicated on those bars. The length of each colored segment in each vertical bar represents the proportion contributed by each structure group. (JPEG 90 kb)
ESM 1
S1a. Fixation indices (Fst, Fis and Fit), number of migrant alleles (Nm) were calculated as follows. Fst = AP/(WI + AI + AP), Fis = AI/(WI + AI), Rit = (AI + AP)/(WI + AI + AP), Nm = [(1/Fst) − 1]/4. AP = Estimated VAR variability Among Populations, AI = Estimated Variability Among Individuals, WI = Estimated Variability Within Individuals. S1b. Pair-wise Fst values (below diagonal) and pair-wise Fst P-values (above diagonal) of date palm populations included in the current study. P values are based on 999 permutations. (DOC 35 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chaluvadi, S.R., Khanam, S., Aly, M.A.M. et al. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Native and Introduced Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera) Germplasm in the United Arab Emirates. Tropical Plant Biol. 7, 30–41 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-014-9135-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-014-9135-7