Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changes in genetic diversity parameters in unimproved and improved populations of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) in Karnataka state, India

  • RESEARCH NOTE
  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams W. T., Zuo J., Shimizu J. Y. and Tappeiner J. C. 1998 Impact of alternative regeneration methods on genetic diversity in coastal Douglas-fir. For. Sci. 44, 390–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchert G. P., Rajora O. P., Hood J. V. and Dancik B. P. 1997 Effects of harvesting on genetic diversity in old-growth eastern white pine in Ontario, Canada. Conserv. Biol. 11, 747–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaisurisri K. and El Kassaby Y. A. 1994 Genetic diversity in seed production population vs natural populations of Picea sitchensis. Biodiversity Conserv. 3, 512–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J. J. and Doyle J. S. 1987 A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh tissues. Phytochem. Bull. 19, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkeldey R. and Mátyás G. 1999 Assessment of population history and adaptive potentials by means of gene markers. In Forest genetics and sustainability (ed. C. Matyas), pp. 91–104. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godt M. J. W., Hamrick J. L., Edwards-Burke M. A. and Williams J. H. 2001 Comparison of genetic diversity in white spruce (Picea glauca) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) seed orchards with natural populations. Can. J. For. Res. 31, 943–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunaga R. P., Vasudeva R., Hanumantha M. and Swaminath M. H. 1999 Blooming variation among clones of different provenances in teak. My For. 35, 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley G. J., Schaberg P. G., DeHayes D. H. and Brissette J. C. 2005 Silviculture lters the genetic structure of an eastern hemlock forest in Maine, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 35, 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Icgen Y., Kaya Z., Cengel B., Velioglǔa E., Ozturka H. and Onde S. 2006 Potential impact of forest management and tree improvement on genetic diversity of Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) plantations in Turkey. For. Ecol. Manage. 225, 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. H., Steane D. A., Jones R. C., Pilbeam D., Vaillancourt R. E. and Potts B. M. 2006 Effect of domestication on the genetic diversity of Eucalyptus globulus. For. Ecol. Manage. 234, 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leberg P. L. 1992 Effects of population bottle necks on genetic diversity as measured by allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution 46, 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyngdoh N., Gunaga R. P., Geeta Joshi, Vasudeva R., Ravikanth G. and Uma Shaanker R. 2012 Influence of geographic distance and genetic dissimilarity among clones on flowering synchrony in a Teak (Tectona grandis L.f) clonal seed orchard. Silvae Genet. 61, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyngdoh N., Gunaga R. P. and Vasudeva R. 2007 Delineation of teak clones through leaf descriptors. Indian J. For. 30, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medri C., Ruas P. M., Higa A. R., Murakami M. and de Fatima Raus C. 2003 Effects of forest management on the genetic diversity in a population of Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Kuntze. Silvae Genet. 52, 202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran G. F., Butcher P. A. and Glaubitz J. C. 2000 Application of genetic markers in domestication conservation and utilisation of genetic resources of Australasian tree species. Aust. J. Bot. 48, 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale D. B. 1985 Genetic implications of shelterwood regeneration of Douglasfir in southwest Oregon. For. Sci. 31, 995–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale D. B. and Adams W. T. 1985 The mating system in natural and shelterwood stands in Douglas-fir. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71, 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R. and Smouse P. E. 2006 GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 288–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabha S. S., Indira E. P. and Nair P. N. 2011 Contemporary gene flow and mating system analysis in natural teak forest using microsatellite markers. Curr. Sci. 101, 1213–1219.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajora O. P. 1999 Genetic biodiversity impacts of silvicultural practices and phenotypic selection in white spruce. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 954–961.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajora O. P., Rahman M. H., Buchert G. P. and Dancik B. P. 2000 Microsatellite DNA analysis of genetic effects of harvesting in old-growth eastern white pine (Pinus strobes) in Ontario, Canada. Mol. Ecol. 9, 339–348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitdtling R. C. and Hiplins V. 1998 Genetic diversity in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) influence of historical and prehistorical events. Can. J. For. Res. 28, 1135–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoehr M. U. and El-Kassaby Y. A. 1997 Levels of genetic diversity at different stages of the domestication cycle of interior spruce in British Columbia. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94, 83–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tangmitcharoen S., Takaso T., Siripatanadilox S., Tasen W. and Owens J. N. 2006 Behavior of major insect pollinators of teak (Tectona grandis L. f.): A comparison of clonal seed orchard versus wild trees. For. Ecol. Manage. 222, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell J. F. and Weeden N. F. 1989 Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In Isozymes in plant biology, vol. 4 in Advances of Plant Science Series (ed. D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis), pp. 5–45. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.

  • Yeh F. C. H. and Boyle T. J. B. 1997 POPGENE version 1.2 Microsoft Windows-based software for population genetics analysis. University of Alberta, Alberta. 505pp.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Director, Group Coordinator (Research), and Head of Department, Tree Improvement and Propagation Division, Institute of Wood Science and Technology, Bangalore, for the facilities provided, and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for providing scholarship to the first author. Assistance and field support provided by research wing of Karnataka Forest Department is acknowledged.

Author information

Author notes

  1. N. LYNGDOH

    Present address: College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, 791 102, India

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tree Improvement and Propagation Division, Institute of Wood Sciences and Technology, 18th Cross Malleswaram, Bangalore, 560 003, India

    N. LYNGDOH & GEETA JOSHI

  2. Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Jakkur Post, Bangalore, 560 064, India

    G. RAVIKANTH & R. UMA SHAANKER

  3. Department of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, College of Forestry, Sirsi, 581 401, India

    R. VASUDEVA

  4. School of Ecology and Conservation, and Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, 560 065, India

    R. UMA SHAANKER

  5. Department of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, 560 065, India

    R. UMA SHAANKER

Authors
  1. N. LYNGDOH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. GEETA JOSHI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. RAVIKANTH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. VASUDEVA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. UMA SHAANKER
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. LYNGDOH.

Additional information

[Lyngdoh N., Joshi G., Ravikanth G., Vasudeva R. and Uma Shaanker R. 2013 Change in genetic parameters in unimproved and improved populations of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) in India. J. Genet. 92, xx–xx]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LYNGDOH, N., JOSHI, G., RAVIKANTH, G. et al. Changes in genetic diversity parameters in unimproved and improved populations of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) in Karnataka state, India. J Genet 92, 141–145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-013-0226-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-013-0226-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation