Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of spatio-temporal trend in groundwater elevation data from arsenic affected alluvial aquifers – Case study from Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Eastern India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluctuation in groundwater level is a time-dependent stochastic process. It is also a function of various inflow and outflow components to and from the hydrologic system concerned. Depth to water level data are measured through a network of observation wells or hydrograph stations to ascertain the degree of fluctuation in groundwater level at the desired scale, on a long-term basis. Basically, these depths to water level data are point measurements, which can be regarded as random variables furnishing changes in groundwater storage over time. The intrinsic in-homogeneity in aquifer materials introduces variations like jumps, trends, and periodicities in such hydrologic time series data. Thus, trending results from certain gradual, natural and/or anthropogenic interventions in the hydrologic environment and analyses of their trends are imperative for assessment of groundwater level scenario in the area of interest. This in turn, is essential for strategic planning and management for exploitation of the precious groundwater resource in the same area. The area of interest in this article, i.e., Murshidabad is one of the nine arsenic affected districts of West Bengal. Here, contamination persist within, shallow, arseniferous, alluvial aquifers, which are otherwise widely exploited for irrigation purposes. According to many researchers working in this area, over-exploitation of groundwater is the root cause for the plummeting water level and the widespread arsenic contamination as well. The present study intends to detect and analyze the trends persisting in the depth to water level data measured over a period from 1996 to 2016, in Murshidabad district of West Bengal, India, amidst its complex and contrasting hydrogeologic set-up and interpret the results in terms of the hydrologic attributes of the Bengal basin as a whole. The non-parametric Mann–Kendall test and the Sen’s slope estimator have been used to identify the linear trend persisting in the time series pre- and post-monsoon groundwater elevation values. The analysis indicates statistically significant decline in water level across the study area especially during the post-monsoon season. This can be attributed to the recharge–discharge disparity within the hydrologic regime; brought through intense pumping over the study area. Its ill effect being particularly observed in the western part of river Bhagirathi. Findings of such study are crucial for assessment of dynamic groundwater resources of the district and subsequently can be utilized as a decision support tool for groundwater management at micro-level.

Research Highlights

  • Declining trend in ground water level elevation is indicative of startling water crisis over a region; however, assessment of such trend should be performed over a quantitative basis, as; fluctuation in groundwater level is a time-dependent stochastic process.

  • A well-knit methodology (including RL correction, spatial interpolation of data, analyses and quantification of trend present in the data) needs to be followed by the groundwater managers operating at the micro-level to keep an account of aquifer storage conditions.

  • Statistically significant declining trend in water level elevation is observed in the Arsenic affected shallow alluvial aquifers, on either sides of river Bhagirathi.Ã

  • Lack of groundwater replenishment within recoverable recharge, coupled with over extraction causes such drop in groundwater elevation.

  • To combat similar situation groundwater extraction should be restricted within the limit of sustainability and should not exceed natural recharge potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adel M M 2005 The background state leading to arsenic contamination of Bengal basin groundwater; J. Water Health 3(4), https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2005.053.

  • Aeschbach-Hertig W and Gleeson T 2012 Regional strategies for the accelerating global problem of groundwater depletion; Nature Geosci. 5(12) 853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi S H and Abbas S 2007 Geostatistical analysis of spatial and temporal variations of groundwater level; Environ. Monit. Assess. 129(1–3) 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander G N and Likens G E 2012 The water table: The shifting foundation of life on land; Ambio. 41(7) 657–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison M A 1998 Geologic framework and environmental status of the Ganges–Brahmaputra Delta; J. Coastal Res. 827–836.

  • Angelo D, Davide M, Vincenzo S and Orazio G 2010 Inferring groundwater system dynamics from hydrological time-series data; Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(4) 593–608, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626661003747556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay S, Kar N S, Das S and Sen J 2014 River systems and water resources of West Bengal: A review; In: Rejuvenation of surface water resources of India: Potential, problems and prospects (ed.) Vaidyanadhan R, Geol. Soc. India Spec. Publ. 3 63–84.

  • Banerjee S and Mitra D 2017 Evaluation of water resource management in Salt Lake City, West Bengal, India; Hydrol. Sci. J. 62(12) 1980–1994, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1351028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A R et al. 2001 Large groundwater strontium flux to the oceans from the Bengal Basin and the marine strontium isotope record; Science 293(5534) 1470–1473.

  • Bates B C, Kundzewicz Z W, Wu S and Palutikof J P 2008 Climate Change and Water (IPCC Secretariat).

  • Bouchaud J P and Potters M 2001 More stylized facts of financial markets: Leverage effect and downside correlations; Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 299(1–2) 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredehoeft J D 2011 Monitoring regional groundwater extraction 2011 The problem; Ground Water 49 808–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy A L 1968 An algorithm and program for calculation of Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient; Behav. Res. Methods 18(1) 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burn D H and Elnur M 2002 Detection of hydrologic trends and variability; J. Hydrol. 255 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Grasby S E and Osadetz K G 2004 Relation between climate variability and groundwater levels in the upper carbonate aquifer, southern Manitoba, Canada; J. Hydrol. 290 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta S, Neal A W, Moharjein T J, Ocheltree T, Rosenheim B E, White C D and Johannesson K H 2011 Perennial ponds are not an important source of water or dissolved organic matter to groundwater with high arsenic concentrations in West Bengal, India; Geophys. Res. Lett. 38(20).

  • Döll P, Hoffmaan-Dobrev H, Portmann F T and Siebert S 2012 Impact of water withdrawals from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations; J. Geodyn. 59 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling C B, Robert J P and Asish R B 2003 The groundwater geochemistry of the Bengal Basin: Weathering, chemsorption, and trace metal flux to the oceans; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67(12) 2117–2136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drápela K and Drápelová I 2011 Application of Mann–Kendall test and the Sen’s slope estimates for trend detection in deposition data from BílýKříž (Beskydy Mts., the Czech Republic) 1997–2010, Beskydy. 4(2) 133–146.

  • Fan Y, Li H and Miguez-Macho G 2013 Global patterns of groundwater table depth; Science 339(6122) 940–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeze R A and Cherry J A 1969 The mechanism of natural groundwater recharge and discharge. 1. One-dimensional, vertical, unsteady, saturated flow above a recharging or discharging groundwater flow system; Water Resour. Res. 5 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan T Y 1998 Hydro climatic trends and possible climatic warming in the Canadian prairies; Water Resour. Res. 34(11) 3009–3015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A K 2007 Groundwater information booklet, district: Murshidabad (arsenic affected area), West Bengal; Central Ground Water Board, Eastern Region, Kolkata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert R O 1987 Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring; Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson R T, Newhouse M W and Dettinger M D 2004 A methodology to assess relations between climatic variability and variations in hydrologic time series in the southwestern United States; J. Hydrol. 287(1–4) 252–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy R W and Cook P G 2002 Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge; Hydrogeol. J. 10 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch R M, Alexandra R B and Smith R A 1991 Selection of methods for the detection and estimation of trends in water quality; Water Resour. Res. 27 803–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho L T K, Yamaguchi Y and Umitsu M 2013 Delineation of small-scale landforms relative to flood inundation in the western Red River delta, northern Vietnam using remotely sensed data; Nat. Hazards 69(1) 905–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M G 1938 A new measure of rank correlation; Biometrika 30(1/2) 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M G 1955 Rank correlation methods (2nd edn); Hafner Publishing Co., Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M G 1975 Rank correlation methods (4th edn), London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kholghi M and Hosseini S M 2009 Comparison of groundwater level estimation using neuro-fuzzy and ordinary Krigging; Environ. Model. Assess. 14(6) 729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V 2007 Optimal contour mapping of groundwater levels using universal Krigging – a case study; Hydrol. Sci. J. 52 1038–1050, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.5.1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewicz Z W, Mata L J, Arnell N and Doell P 2007 Freshwater resources and their management; In: IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds) Parry M L et al., Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 173–210.

  • Mann H B 1945 Non-parametric test against trend; Econometrica 13 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantegna R N 1999 Hierarchical structure in financial markets; The European Physical Journal B – Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 11(1) 193–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantegna R N and Stanley H E 2000 An Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance; Cambridge University Press.

  • Michael H A and Voss C I 2009 Estimation of regional-scale groundwater flow properties in the Bengal Basin of India and Bangladesh; Hydrogeol. J. 17(6) 1329–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollah S 2016 Causes of flood hazard in Murshidabad District of West Bengal: Victims’ perceptions; In: Neo-thinking on Ganges-Brahmaputra Basin Geomorphology (eds) Das B C, Ghosh S, Islam A and Ismail M, Springer, Basel, pp. 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal A, Kundu S and Mukhopadhyay A 2012 Rainfall trend analysis by Mann–Kendall test: A case study of north-eastern part of the Cuttack District, Orissa, Int. J. Geol. Earth Environ. Sci. 2(1) 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal D 2017 Geo-spatial dynamics of wetland regime in Murshidabad district: A hydro-geomorphological study; Ph.D. thesis, University of Gour Banga, India.

  • Mukherjee A, Fryar A E and Rowe H D 2007a Regional-scale stable isotopic signatures of recharge and deep groundwater in the arsenic affected areas of West Bengal, India; J. Hydrol. 334(1–2) 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Fryar A E and Howell P D 2007b Regional hydrostratigraphy and groundwater flow modeling in the arsenic-affected areas of the western Bengal basin, West Bengal, India; Hydrogeol. J. 15 1397–1418.

  • Mukherjee A, Fryar A E and William A T 2009 Geologic, geomorphic and hydrologic framework and evolution of the Bengal basin, India and Bangladesh; J. Asian Earth Sci. 34(3) 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Fryar A E, Scanlon B R, Bhattacharya P and Bhattacharya A 2011 Elevated arsenic in groundwater of the western Bengal basin, India: Extent and controls from regional to local scale; Appl. Geochem. 26 600–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A 2018 Hydrodynamics of groundwater flow in the arsenic-affected areas of the Gangetic West Bengal, India; In: Clean and Sustainable Groundwater in India (eds) Saha D, Marwaha S and Mukherjee A, Springer Hydrogeology, Springer, Singapore.

  • Mukherjee A, Fryar A E, Eastridge E M, Nally R S, Chakraborty M and Scanlo B R 2018 Controls on high and low groundwater arsenic on the opposite banks of the lower reaches of River Ganges, Bengal basin, India; Sci. Total Environ. 645 1371–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narany T S, Ramli M F, Aris A Z, Sulaiman W N A and Fakharian K 2014 Spatiotemporal variation of groundwater quality using integrated multivariate statistical and geostatistical approaches in Amol–Babol Plain, Iran; Environ. Monit. Assess. 186(9) 5797–5815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S and Akoma O C 2009 Water scarcity in wetland area within Kandi Block of West Bengal: A hydro-ecological assessment; Ethiopian J. Environ. Stud. Manag. 2(3).

  • Panda D K, Mishra A and Kumar A 2012 Quantification of trends in groundwater levels of Gujarat in western India; Hydrol. Sci. J. 57(7) 1325–1336; https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.705845.

  • Patle G, Khanna M, Sahoo R and Singh D 2015 Time series analysis of groundwater levels and projection of future trend; J. Geol. Soc. India 85(2) 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokhorov A V 2001 Kendall coefficient of rank correlation, Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V./Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Rahman A T M S, Kamruzzaman M, Chowdhury S J, Mazumder Q H and Hossain A 2016 Evaluation of spatio-temporal dynamics of water table in NW Bangladesh: An integrated approach of GIS and Statistics; Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2(3) 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangarajan R and Athavale R N 2000 Annual replenishable ground water potential of India – an estimate based on injected tritium studies; J. Hydrol. 234(1–2) 38–53.

  • Rudra K 2014 Changing river courses in the western part of the Ganga–Brahmaputra delta; Geomorphology 227 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo T A and Lall U 2017 Depletion and response of deep groundwater to climate-induced pumping variability; Nature Geosci. 10(2) 105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmi T, Maata A, Antilla P, Ruoho-Airola T and Amnell T 2002 Detecting trends of atmospheric pollutants by the Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimates – the Excel template application Makesens; Finish Metrological Institute, 35p.

  • Samadder S, Ghosh K and Basu T 2015 Causality analysis of USA Stock Market over Indian Stock Market; J. Int. Acad. Phys. Sci. 19(3) 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar M S et al. 2014 Elevated arsenic and manganese in groundwaters of Murshidabad, West Bengal, India; Sci. Total Environ. 488 570–579.

  • Santra B K 2017 Arsenic contamination of groundwater in West Bengal: Awareness for health and social problems; Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 5(1) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon B R, Reedy R C, Stonestrom D A, Prudic D E and Dennehy K F 2005 Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Glob. Change Biol. 11 1577–1593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen P K 1968 Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau; J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63(324) 1379–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serois A 1998 A brief and biased overview of time series analysis or how to find that evasive trend; WMO Report no. 133, WMO/EMEP workshop on Advanced Statistical methods and their Application to Air Quality Data sets, Helsinki, pp. 14–18.

  • Sikdar P K, Sarkar S S and Palchoudhury S 2001 Geochemical evolution of groundwater in the Quaternary aquifer of Calcutta and Howrah, India; J. Asian Earth Sci. 19(5) 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith L C 2000 Trends in Russian Artic river-ice formation and breakup, 1917 to 1994; Phys. Geogr. 20(1) 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous M 2012 On understanding and predicting groundwater response time; Groundwater 50 528–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Kang S, Li F and Zhang L 2009 Comparison of interpolation methods for depth to groundwater and its temporal and spatial variations in the Minqin oasis of northwest China; Environ. Model. Softw. 24(10) 1163–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabari H, Marofi S and Ahmadi M 2011 Long-term variations of the water quality parameters in the Maroon river, Iran; Environ. Monit. Assess. 177 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur G S and Thomas T 2011 Analysis of groundwater levels for detection of trend in Sagar District, Madhya Pradesh; J. Geol. Soc. India 77 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil H 1950 A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. I, II, III; Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. 53 386–392, 521–525, 1397–1412, MR 0036489.

  • Vishwakarma D K, Kumar R, Pandey K, Singh V and Kushwaha K S 2018 Modelling of rainfall and ground water fluctuation of Gonda District, Uttar Pradesh, India; Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7(05) 2613–2618, https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.302.

  • Wada Y, Van Beek L P H and Bierkens M F P 2012a Non-sustainable groundwater sustaining irrigation: A global assessment; Wat. Resour. Res. 48.

  • Wada Y, Van Beek L P H, Weiland F C S, Chao B F, Wu Y H and Bierkens M F P 2012b Past and future contribution of global groundwater depletion to sea-level rise; Geophys. Res. Lett. 39(2).

  • Wilcox D and Gebbie T 2004 On the analysis of cross-correlations in South African market data; Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 344(1–2) 294–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z X, Takeuchi K and Ishidaira H 2003 Monotonic trend and step changes in Japanese precipitation; J. Hydrol. 279 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Li C, Hu H, Lei Z, Yang S, Kusuda T, Koike T and Musike K 2004 Analysis of water resources variability in the Yellow river of China during the last half century using their historical data; Water Resour. Res. 40(6) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Hervey K D, Hogg W D and Yuzyk T R 2001 Trends in Canadian stream flow; Water Resour. Res. 37(4) 987–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Yongqiang et al. 2004 Effect of soil water deficit on evapotranspiration, crop yield, and water use efficiency in the North China Plain; Agr. Water Manag. 64(2) 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present research has been carried out under the aegis of World Bank funded National Hydrology Project. The authors hereby acknowledge the help and cooperation received from all concerned authority(s).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India

    Rhitwik Chatterjee & Kalyan Adhikari

  2. Department of Mathematics, Fakir Chand College, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India

    Swetadri Samadder

  3. Department of Geography, Subhas Chandra Bose Centenary College, University of Kalyani, Lalbagh, Murshidabad, India

    Debabrata Mondal

Authors
  1. Rhitwik Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Swetadri Samadder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Debabrata Mondal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kalyan Adhikari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization of the work, data collection, interpretation and manuscript drafting has been done by Rhitwik Chatterjee and statistical treatments of the data have been performed by Dr. Swetadri Samadder. Dr. Debabrata Mondal created the maps and has participated in the manuscript drafting jointly with Rhitwik Chatterjee. Dr. Kalyan Adhikari has read and approved the final manuscript and has extended critical assessment of the manuscript all along the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhitwik Chatterjee.

Additional information

Communicated by Dipankar Saha

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chatterjee, R., Samadder, S., Mondal, D. et al. Analysis of spatio-temporal trend in groundwater elevation data from arsenic affected alluvial aquifers – Case study from Murshidabad district, West Bengal, Eastern India. J Earth Syst Sci 129, 228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01489-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01489-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation