Skip to main content
Log in

Continental rift-setting and evolution of Neoproterozoic Sindreth Basin in NW-India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Neoproterozoic Sindreth Basin, NW India, and its surrounding area represent a half graben structure situated between the undeformed Malani Igneous Suite (MIS) in the west and a corridor of coeval Cryogenian ductile deformation, anatexis and granite intrusion in the east. The main lithologies observed in the basin are conglomerate, fanglomerate, debris flow and lake deposits derived from a nearby continental provenance, intercalated with concurrent mafic and felsic lava flows. Based on geological traverses across the strike of the basin, we propose a three-fold classification comprising Lower Clastic Unit and an Upper Clastic Unit and a Bimodal (basalt–rhyolite) Volcanic Unit separating the two. Tilting due to basin inversion and faulting has been observed; however, the rocks are unmetamorphosed and show undisturbed primary sedimentary features. The stratigraphic record of the basin is characteristic for deposition and magmatism in a fault-related continental setting. Implications of the findings have been discussed in the context of Neoproterozoic crustal dynamics in NW India. This study provides conclusive evidence for a continental setting for Sindreth Basin evolution and contests the recent models of active subduction setting (either back-arc basin or accretionary sediments over a subduction zone).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashwal L D, Solanki A M, Pandit M K, Corfu F, Hendriks B W H, Burke K and Torsvik T H 2013 Geochronology and geochemistry of Neoproterozoic Mt. Abu Granitoids, NW India: Regional correlation and implications for Rodinia paleogeography; Precamb. Res. 236 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan S K 2000 Malani rhyolites – a review; Gondwana Res. 3 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chore S A and Mohanty M 1998 Stratigraphy and tectonic setting of the Trans-Aravalli Neoproterozoic volcano-sedimentary sequences in Rajasthan; J. Geol. Soc. India 51 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins A S and Pisarevsky S A 2005 Amalgamating eastern Gondwana: the evolution of the Circum-Indian Orogens; Earth-Sci. Rev. 71 229–270.

  • de Wall H, Schöbel S, Pandit M K, Sharma K K and Just J 2010 A record of ductile syn-intrusional fabrics to post solidification cataclasis: Magnetic fabric analyses of Neoproterozoic Mirpur and Mt. Abu Granitoids, NW India; In: Structural Geology: From Classical to Modern Concepts, Geol. Soc. India 75 239–253.

  • de Wall H, Pandit M K, Sharma K K, Schöbel S and Just J 2014 Deformation and granite intrusion in the Sirohi area, SW Rajasthan – Constraints on Cryogenian to Pan-African crustal dynamics of NW India; Precamb. Res. 254 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dharma Rao C V, Santosh M and Kim S W 2012 Cryogenian volcanic arc in the NW Indian Shield: Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb geochronology of felsic tuffs and implications for Gondwana assembly; Gondwana Res. 22 36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geological Survey of India 1998 Geological map of India. 1 map on 4 sheets: col.; \(94\times 78\) cm. 7th edn, Hyderabad.

  • Gregory L C, Meert J G, Bingen B, Pandit M K and Torsvik T H 2009 Paleomagnetism and geochronology of the Malani Igneous Suite, northwest India: Implications for the configuration of Rodinia and the assembly of Gondwana; Precamb. Res. 170 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S N, Arora Y K, Mathur R K, Iqballuddin Prasad B, Sahai T N and Sharma S B 1997 The Precambrian geology of the Aravalli Region, southern Rajasthan and northeastern Gujarat; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 123 262p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heron A M 1953 The geology of central Rajputana; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 79 389p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A M 1970 Physical processes in geology: A method for interpretation of natural phenomena – intrusions in igneous rocks, fractures, and folds, flow of debris and ice; 1st edn, Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco, 577p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just J, Schulz B, de Wall H, Jourdan F and Pandit M K 2011 Monazite CHIME/EPMA dating of Erinpura granitoid deformation: Implications for Neoproterozoic tectono-thermal evolution of NW India; Gondwana Res. 19 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major J J 1997 Depositional processes in large-scale debris-flow experiments; J. Geol. 105 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder T and Alexander J 2001 The physical character of subaqueous sedimentary density flows and their deposits; Sedimentology 48 269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik M S 1993 The geochemistry and genesis of the granitoids of Sirohi, Rajasthan, India; J. Southeast Asian Earth Sci. 8 111–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareek H S 1981 Petrochemistry and petrogenesis of the Malani Igneous Suite, India; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 92 206–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purohit R, Papineau D, Kröner A, Sharma K K and Roy A B 2012 Carbon isotope geochemistry and geochronological constraints of the Neoproterozoic Sirohi Group from northwest India; Precamb. Res. 220–221 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy A B and Jakhar S R 2002 Geology of Rajasthan (Northwest India) – Precambrian to Recent; Scientific Publishers (India), Jodhpur, 421p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy A B and Sharma K K 1999 Geology of the region around Sirohi town, western Rajasthan – story of Neoproterozoic evolution of the Trans-Aravalli crust; In: Geological Evolution of Western Rajasthan (ed.) Paliwal B S, Scientific Publishers India, Jodhpur, pp. 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar G, Bishui P K, Chattopadhyay B, Chowdhury S, Chowdhury I, Saha K C and Kumar A 1992 Geochronology of granites and felsic rocks of the Delhi Fold Belt; Rec. Geol. Surv. India 125 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Pande K, Sheth H C, Sharma K K, Sarkar S, Dayal A M and Mistry H 2013 An Ediacaran-Cambrian thermal imprint in Rajasthan, western India: Evidence from 40Ar-39Ar geochronology of the Sindreth volcanics; J. Earth Syst. Sci.  122 1477–1493.

  • Scharfenberg L, de Wall H, Schöbel S, Minor A, Maurer M, Pandit M K and Sharma K K 2015 In-situ gamma radiation measurements in the Neoproterozoic rocks of Sirohi region, NW India; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 124 1223–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K K 1996 Stratigraphy, structure and tectonic evolution of the metasediments and associated rocks of the Sirohi region, southwestern Rajasthan: Unpublished PhD thesis, Mohalal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, 103p.

  • Sharma K K 2004a Geological setting of the Balda (Sirohi) Tungsten Deposit, Rajasthan; J. Appl. Geochem. 6 213–220.

  • Sharma K K 2004b The Neoproterozoic Malani magmatism of the northwestern Indian shield: implications for crust-building processes; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.) 113 795–807.

  • Singh Y K, De Waele B, Karmakar S, Sarkar S and Biswal T K 2010 Tectonic setting of the Balaram–Kui–Surpagla–Kengora granulites of the South Delhi Terrane of the Aravalli Mobile Belt, NW India and its implication on correlation with the East African Orogen in the Gondwana assembly; Precamb. Res. 183 669–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn Y K, Rhee C W and Kim B C 1999 Debris flow and hyperconcentrated flood-flow deposits in an alluvial fan, northwestern part of the Cretaceous Yongdong Basin, central Korea; J. Geol. 107 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somani O P, Misra A, Jeyagopal A V, Nanda L K and Parihar P S 2012 Radioelemental distribution in Neoproterozoic volcano-sedimentary Sindreth Basin, Sirohi District, Rajasthan and its significance; Curr. Sci. 103 305.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lente B, Ashwal L D, Pandit M K, Bowring S A and Torsvik T H 2009 Neoproterozoic hydrothermally altered basaltic rocks from Rajasthan, northwest India: Implications for late Precambrian tectonic evolution of the Aravalli Craton; Precamb. Res. 170 202–222.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L Scharfenberg, M Maurer and E Cacciatore (GZN Erlangen) for their support in the field. We also thank M K Pandit (Jaipur) for discussion on the geological setting. We kindly acknowledge the DFG Grant (Wa-1010/15-1) for part of this study. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Schöbel.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: Partha Pratim Chakraborty

Appendix: Description of the Sindreth lithostratigraphy

Appendix: Description of the Sindreth lithostratigraphy

1.1 A1. Lower Clastic Unit (LCU)

1.1.1 A1.1 Conglomerate facies

Generally, the conglomerate of the LCU is very poorly sorted with a wide spectrum of clasts varying from sand to boulders (up to 50 cm; figure A1-a). The components are angular to subrounded and comprise usually metasedimentary rocks of the Sirohi Group (carbon phyllite, mica-schist, quartzite) and milky quartz, most likely derived from quartz veins within these units (figure A1-b). Although the composition and clast size of the conglomerate is highly variable throughout the whole unit, some parts of the conglomerate are monomict as they are almost exclusively composed of large clasts of angular carbon phyllites (figure A1-c). The components are supported by a red-violet coloured matrix which consists of fine-to-medium grained sand and detritic ferruginous material. The conglomerate is amalgamated, as individual beds are usually not distinguishable. A rare phenomenon is the presence of lenticular sandstone bodies (figure A1-d). Those wedge out laterally and show a thickness up to 10 cm and an extent of up to 1 m.

Figure 10
figure 10

Conglomerates of LCU. (a) Unsorted, angular clasts of different size. (b) Rock slab showing polymictic clasts, milky quartz is well rounded. (c) Monomictic parts showing large angular fragments of metasediments. (d) Intercalated sandstone beds.

1.1.2 A1.2 Pebbly coarse-sandstone facies

The pebbly coarse-sandstone facies represents the upper 25 m of the unit (figure A2-a). This facies is intermittently interbedded with the conglomerates and shows a gradual increase in proportion towards the top of the LCU. The deposit cannot be confined to one specific grain size, but rather shows a variation of dominance of coarse sandstone and domination of fine pebble (figure A2-b). The geometry of the individual layers is sheet like, with a thickness generally <50 cm. The components are angular to subrounded and include quartz, feldspar, platy muscovite (up to 5 mm) and rock fragments. These comprise metasedimentary rocks (carbon-phyllite, mica-schist and quartzite), milky quartz and granites. The fabric is supported by a pale siliciclastic matrix. Radiometric analysis by Somani et al. (2012) and Scharfenberg et al. (2015) in the coarse-sandstone facies revealed an augmented natural-gamma ray activity due to an enrichment of uranium.

Figure 11
figure 11

The pebbly coarse-sandstone, forming the uppermost part of LCU.

1.2 A2. Bimodal Volcanic Unit (BVU)

1.2.1 A2.1 Mafic volcanics

In between the ridges of the LCU and the rhyolites, the mafic volcanics form a depression. Outcrops are usually related to quarries. The mafic volcanics comprise basaltic flows (figure A3-a) and mafic volcanoclastics (figure A3-b). While mafic volcanoclastics are frequent in the basal parts of the sequence, the share of volcanoclastics decreases and basaltic flows dominate following up the stratigraphy. The maximum inferred stratigraphic thickness of the mafic volcanics is about \(\sim \)500 m. The mafics are tilted in west direction (mean dip direction of 285\({^{\circ }})\), but show no evidence of further deformation. Epidote and olivine can be abundant, but are predominantly present as xenolithic agglomerates. The flows width lies in the range of 20–50 cm. Vesicles can be common and are usually unfilled. Some flows show spheroidal weathering (figure A3-c) which at places give a pillow-like appearance. However, also in the field it is evident that the rounded structures are secondary weathering effects (figure A3-d). According to geochemical analyses (van Lente et al. 2009), the basalts show a tholeiitic signature.

Figure 12
figure 12

Mafic volcanics. (a) Massive basaltic flows. (b) Volcanoclastics are frequent in the basal parts of the sequence. (c and d) Vesicles and spheroidal weathering can be observed in some basaltic flows.

1.2.2 A2.2 Rhyolites

The rhyolites are the most significant topological feature in the Sindreth area. The felsic volcanics form a 250-m high north–south trending ridge (figure A4-a). The rhyolites have their maximum extension close to Sindreth with their maximum stratigraphic thickness of about 900 m. They thin out to north and are tectonically reduced to the south. The rhyolitic sequence varies strongly in its occurrence. However, it is possible to differentiate two main types: one shows small phenocrysts with a pale pinkish matrix (figure A4-c), while the other type is characterized by an almost granitoid texture showing large phenocrysts (up to 1 cm) and a dark red matrix (figure A4-b). The rhyolitic ‘layers’ show with 10 cm up to a couple of meters, a huge variance in their thickness and dip with steep angles to west direction. The whole sequence shows a quite regular joint pattern with predominantly subparallel joints dipping in west direction with 40\({^{\circ }}\)–60\({^{\circ }}\). There is strong indication from magnetic fabric analyses that at least part of the rhyolites represent dyke intrusions which will be investigated in more detail in further studies. In the field it is hardly possible to discriminate if the Pamta ridge is an amalgam of rhyolitic flows and later intruded felsic dikes.

Figure 13
figure 13

(a) The rhyolites build up the significant ridge of the Sindreth Basin. Rhyolites with (b) larger and (c) smaller phenocrysts can be distinguished.

1.3 A3. Upper Clastic Unit (UCU)

1.3.1 A3.1 Tuff facies

The tuffs are bright greenish-gray in colour, very fine grained and massive. They are usually silicified and can form small ridges (\(\sim \)15 m) which are aligned parallel to the general striking (N–S). The pale volcanic ash is often interlayered by small bands of darker shale giving a laminated appearance. The filigree bedding shows synsedimentary brittle deformation (figure A5-a). The thickness of the tuff layers can reach up to a few meters. In between these laminated beds, massive strata also can occur. These have cherty appearance due to intense silification (figure A5-b). In the lowermost \(\sim \)750 m part of the Upper Clastic Unit, the tuff beds are rarely interrupted by sand layers. With the onset of coarse sedimentation, the ash layers become less dominant and most often form beds with thickness <20 cm, although they may reach a few meters in the later parts of the sections. The felsic volcanics alternate with greywackes, arkoses and conglomerates.

Figure 14
figure 14

(a) Filigree laminated and (b) massive tuff layers are dominant in the lower UCU.

1.3.2 A3.2 Lithic greywacke facies

The lithic greywacke facies is characterized by yellow-brown normally graded sandstones with a coarser (pebble) grained, massive bottom layer, which gradually passes into fine-sandstone towards the top (figure A6-a, b). Individual sequences reach a thickness of 20–50 cm and show a gentle wavy erosional base contact. The grading of the greywackes becomes weaker in upper parts of the unit. The sequences show amalgamation, so that distinction of individual layers is not possible. Components are subangular to subrounded and comprise quartz, feldspar and rock fragments, which include metapelite, quartzite, silicified tuff, Erinpura- and Mirpur-type granite, basalt, rhyolite and rip-up clasts of rhyolitic tuff. Quartz grains show a higher grade of rounding than other components. The greywackes show a siliciclastic matrix. The sequences are intercalated by thin layers (generally <20 cm) of tuff or shale.

Figure 15
figure 15

Graded sandstones of the lithic greywacke facies.

Figure 16
figure 16

(a) Conglomerate facies and (b) arkose facies of UCU.

1.3.3 A3.3 Conglomerate facies

The conglomerate of the Upper Clastic Unit is brown-yellow in colour and poorly sorted with grain sizes ranging from pebbles to cobbles (figure A7-a). Most of the clasts larger than 2 cm are rounded to well-rounded and comprise mostly milky quartz and quartzite, but also granite, rhyolite, basalt and rip-up clasts of tuff. The deposits are massive and show normal gradation from coarse sand to pebbles/cobbles. Individual sequences commonly range between 0.5 and 1 m. In contrast to the greywackes, the matrix is not silicified and rather soft. Imbrication fabrics are rarely preserved and do not deliver trustful paleocurrent directions. Apart from that, the conglomerate is lacking sedimentary features.

1.3.4 A3.4 Arkose facies

The arkose facies comprises well sorted massive, brown-red sandstone (figure A7-b). The layers show a maximum thickness of 2 m and are intercalated by conglomerate, lithic greywacke and tuff. They consist of quartz, feldspar and micas, the latter being concentrated at surfaces parallel to bedding. The cementing material is silicic and components are subrounded to rounded. Sedimentary structures are absent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schöbel, S., Sharma, K.K., Hörbrand, T. et al. Continental rift-setting and evolution of Neoproterozoic Sindreth Basin in NW-India. J Earth Syst Sci 126, 90 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0855-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0855-6

Keywords

Navigation