Skip to main content
Log in

Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Neoproterozoic Mylliem granitoids, Meghalaya Plateau, northeastern India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Mylliem granitoids of the Meghalaya Plateau, northeastern India, represent one of the disharmonic Neoproterozoic igneous plutons, which are intrusive into low-grade Shillong Group of metasediments. Field studies indicate that the Mylliem granitoids cover an area of about 40 km2 and is characterized by development of variable attitude of primary foliations mostly marked along the margin of the pluton. Xenoliths of both Shillong Group of metasediments and mafic rocks have been found to occur within Mylliem granitoids. Structural study of the primary foliation is suggestive of funnel-shaped intrusion of Mylliem granitoids with no appreciable evidence of shearing. Petrographically, Mylliem granitoids are characterized by pink to white phenocrysts of prismatic microcline/perthite and lath-shaped plagioclase (An20–An29). Groundmass material is characterized by quartz, microcline, plagioclase, muscovite and biotite. Sphene and apatite occur as accessory minerals. Petrographically Mylliem granitoids have been discriminated as granite and granodiorite according to IUGS system of classification.

Critical evaluation of geochemical data and variation trends of major oxides/trace elements suggests a significant role of fractional crystallization in the evolution of Mylliem pluton. Th/U ratios (3.22–6.77) indicate a relatively higher abundance of Th over U. Chondrite-normalized REE diagram characteristically shows an enriched LREE pattern and prominent negative Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu* = 0.16–0.42) indicating the significant role of plagioclase fractionation from the parent magma. An overall strong REE fractionation pattern has been envisaged for Mylliem granitoids. The strong REE fractionation of the Mylliem granitoids is depicted by (Ce/Yb) N values, which show a range of 1.39 to 1.65. The aluminium saturation index (ASI) (ranging from 1.0 to 1.3), A/CNK ratios (ranging from 1.4 to 2.11) and A/NK ratios (ranging from 1.75 to 2.43) provide evidences for the peraluminous, S-type nature of the Mylliem granitoids. The peraluminous, S-type character is further supported by geochemical parameters such as Fe* and MALI (modified alkali lime index). Normative corundum > 1.0 wt.% is suggestive of the S-type nature of Mylliem granitoids. This is indicative of parent melt-extraction from metasedimentary source rocks by partial melting. Distinct geochemical parameters suggest a post-orogenic tectonic environment for the Mylliem granitoids. The peraluminous, calc-alkalic to alkali-calcic, post-orogenic Mylliem granitoids are geochemically correlatable with the post-orogenic Caledonian granitoids of Ireland and Britain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharyya A, Ray S, Chaudhuri B K, Basu S K, Bhaduri S K and Sanyal A K 2006 Proterozoic rock suites along South Purulia Shear Zone, Eastern India: evidence for rift-related setting; J. Geol. Soc. India 68 1069–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharyya S K, Mitra N D and Nandy D R 1986 Regional geology and tectonic setting of North-East India and adjoining region; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 119 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arth J G 1979 Some trace elements in Trondjhemites – their implications to magma genesis and palaeotectonic setting; Trondjhemites, Dacites and Related Rocks; (ed.) Barker F (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 313–345.

  • Barbarin B 1999 A review of the relationships between granitoid types, their origins and their geodynamic environments; Lithos 46 605–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker F and Arth J G 1976 Generation of trondjhemite tonalitic liquids and Archaean bimodal trondjhemite–basalt suite; Geology 4 596–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G C, Thorpe R S and Webb P C 1984 The geochemical characteristics of granitoid in contrasting areas and comments on magma sources; J. Geol. Soc. London 141 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell B W and White A J R 1974 Two contrasting granite types; Pacific Geol. 8 173–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee N, Mazumdar A C, Bhattacharya A and Saikia R R 2007 Mesoproterozoic granulites of the Shillong–Meghalaya Plateau: Evidence of westward continuation of the Prydz Bay Pan-African suture into Northeastern India; Precamb. Res. 152 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collerson K D and Bridgwater D 1979 Metamorphic development of early Archaean tonalitic and trondjhemitic gneisses: Saglek area, Labrador Trondjhemites, Dacites and Related Rocks (ed.) Barker F (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 205–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta A B and Biswas A K 2000 Geology of Assam; J. Geol. Soc. India, Bangalore, 169p.

  • Desikachar S V 1974 A review of the tectonic and geological history of eastern India in terms of plate tectonic theory; J. Geol. Soc. India 15 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar S, Frei R, Kramers J D, Nagler T F and Kochhar N 1996 Sr, Pb and Nd isotope studies and their bearing on the petrogenesis of the Jalore and Siwana complexes, Rajasthan, India; J. Geol. Soc. India 48 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans P 1964. The tectonic framework of Assam; J. Geol. Soc. India 5 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost B R, Barens C G, Collins W J, Arculus R J, Ellis D J and Frost C D 2001 A geochemical classification for granite rocks; J. Petrol. 42 2033–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Chakraborty S, Paul D K, Bhalla J K, Bishui P K and Gupta S N 1994 New Rb–Sr isotopic ages and geochemistry of granitoids from Meghalaya and their significance in middle-to-late Proterozoic crustal evolution; Indian Minerals 48 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Fallick A E, Paul D K and Potts P J 2005 Geochemistry and origin of Neoproterozoic Granitoids of Meghalaya, Northeast India: Implications for linkage with amalgamation of Gondwana Supercontinent; Gondwana Res. 8(3) 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R P and Sen A K 1988 Imprints of the Ninety-East Ridge in the Shillong Plateau, Indian Shield; Tectonophysics 154 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine R, Williams I S, Chappell B W and White A J R 1978 Contrasts between I- and S- type granitoids of the Kosciusco Batholith; J. Geol. Soc. Australia 25 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes W and Holtz F 1996 Petrogenesis and Experimental Petrology of Granitic Rocks (Heidelberg: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kochhar N and Dhar S 1993 The association of hypersolvus-subsolvus granites: A study of Malani igneous suite, India; J. Geol. Soc. India 42 449–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauskopf K 1982 Introduction to Geochemistry, 2nd edn., (New York: Mcgraw Hill Book Company), 611p.

  • MacDonald R 1966 Manuscript map for the geology of Uganda; Unpublished Report, Department of Land and Surveys, Entebbe, Uganda.

  • Mackenzie D E, Black L P and Sun S S 1988 Origin of alkali feldspar granites: An example from the Poimena Granite, northeastern Tasmania, Australia; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52 2507–2524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniar P D and Piccoli P M 1989 Tectonic discrimination of granitoids; Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer.. 101 635–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar S K 1976 A summary of the Precambrian geology of the Khasi Hills, Meghalaya; Geol. Surv. India Misc. Publ. 23(2) 311–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittlefehldt D W and Miller C F 1983 Geochemistry of Sweetwater Wash Pluton, California: implications for anomalous trace element behaviour during differentiation of felsic magmas; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagudi B, Koeberl C and Kurat G 2003 Petrography and geochemistry of the Singo granite, Uganda and implications for its origin; J. African Earth Sci. 36 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandy D R 1980 Tectonic pattern in northeastern India; Indian J. Earth Sci. 7 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy D R 1981 Tectonic Pattern in NE India – a discussion; Indian J. Earth Sci. 8(1) 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy D R 1986 Tectonics, seismicity and gravity of Northeastern India and adjoining region; Geol. Surv. India Memoir. 119 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy D R 2001 Geodynamics of northeastern India and the adjoining region; (Calcutta: ACB Publications), 209p.

  • O’Connor J T 1965 A classification of quartz rich igneous rock based on feldspar ratio; US Geol. Surv. Paper 525(B) 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J A, Harris N B W and Tindle A G 1984 Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks; J. Petrol. 25 956–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S 1985 Petrochemistry of the Mylliem granite, Khasi Hills, Meghalaya; J. Geol. Soc. India 26(5) 356–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers J J W and Greenberg J K 1990 Late-orogenic, post-orogenic and anorogenic granites: Distinction by major elements and trace elements chemistry and possible origins; J. Geol. Soc. India 98 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson H R 1993 Using Geochemical Data: Evaluation, Presentation, Interpretation (Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman), 352p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satyanarayanan M, Balaram V, Gnaneswar Rao T and Rajendra N P 2006 Application of ICP-MS in earth system sciences; J. Geol. Soc. India 68 923–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen J, Ranganath N, Rathaiah Y V, Sen D B and Kak S N 2009 Petrography and geochemistry of uranium mineralised Precambrian Granitic-Pegmatitic rocks of Mawlait, West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya; J. Geol. Soc. India 74 639–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shand S J 1943 The Eruptive Rocks, Second edition (New York: John Wiley), 444p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh B N 2007 Petrology and geochemistry of the Mount Abu Granites, Southwestern Rajasthan; J. Geol. Soc. India 69 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava R K and Sinha A K 2004 The Early Cretaceous Sung Valley ultramafic–mafic–alkaline–carbonatite complex, Shillong Plateau, Northeastern India: Petrological and genetic significance; Mineral. Petrol. 80 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streckeisen A 1976 To each plutonic rock its proper name; Earth Sci. Rev. 12 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes; In: Magmatism in the Ocean Basins, (eds) Saunders A D and Norry M J, Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 42 313–345.

  • Tarney J 1976 Geochemistry of Archaean high-grade gneisses, with implications as to the origin and evolution of the Archaean Crust; The Early History of the Earth (ed.) Windley B F (London: Wiley-Interscience), 405–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarney J, Weaver B and Drury S A 1979 Geochemistry of Archaean trondjhemitic and tonalitic gneisses from Scotland and E. Greenland; Trondjhemites, Dacites and Related Rocks (ed.) Barker F (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 275–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen J B, Currie K L and Chappell B W 1987 A-type granites: Geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis; Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 95 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ABHISHEK SAHA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RAY, J., SAHA, A., GANGULY, S. et al. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Neoproterozoic Mylliem granitoids, Meghalaya Plateau, northeastern India. J Earth Syst Sci 120, 459–473 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0084-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0084-3

Keywords

Navigation