Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

SCS-CN and GIS-based approach for identifying potential water harvesting sites in the Kali Watershed, Mahi River Basin, India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Kali sub-watershed is situated in the semi-arid region of Gujarat, India and forms a part of the Mahi River Watershed. This watershed receives an average annual rainfall of 900mm mainly between July and September. Due to high runoff potential, evapo-transpiration and poor infiltration, drought like situation prevails in this area from December to June almost every year. In this paper, augmentation of water resource is proposed by construction of runoff harvesting structures like check dam, percolation pond, farm pond, well and subsurface dyke. The site suitability for different water harvesting structures is determined by considering spatially varying parameters like runoff potential, slope, fracture pattern and micro-watershed area. GIS is utilised as a tool to store, analyse and integrate spatial and attribute information pertaining to runoff, slope, drainage and fracture. The runoff derived by SCS-CN method is a function of runoff potential which can be expressed in terms of runoff coefficient (ratio between the runoff and rainfall) which can be classified into three classes, viz., high (>40%), moderate (20–40%) and low (<20%). In addition to IMSD, FAO specifications for water harvesting/recharging structures, parameters such as effective storage, rock mass permeability are herein considered to augment effective storage. Using the overlay and decision tree concepts in GIS, potential water harvesting sites are identified. The derived sites are field investigated for suitability and implementation. In all, the accuracy of the site selection at implementation level varies from 80–100%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrbera P L, Casto S L, Minciardi R and Paolucci M 1995 Integrating meteosat satellite and rain-gauge information to estimate rainfall patterns; Surveys in Geophysics 16 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K J and Kirkby M J 1979 A physically based, variable contributing model of basin hydrology; Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 24 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q, Koa C, Yuana Y, Gea Y and Zhanga S 2006 GIS modeling for predicting river runoff volume in ungauged drainages in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada; Computers & Geosciences 32 1108–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosh M H, Jackson T J, Bindlish R and Prueger J H 2004 Watershed scale temporal and spatial stability of soil moisture and its role in validating satellite estimates; Remote Sensing of Environment 92 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahiwalker S D and Singh R P 2006 Optimal Design of Intermediate Storage for Adoption of Micro Irrigation in Canal Command Area, IE(I); Journal AG 18 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winnaar G, Jewitt G P Wand Horan M 2007 GIS-based approach for identifying potential runoff harvesting sites in the Thukela River basin, South Africa; Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 32 1058–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downer C W, Ogden F L, Martin W D and Harmon R S 2002 Theory, development, and applicability of the surface water hydrologic model CASC2D; Hydrol. Process. 16 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Awar F A, Makke M K, Zurayk R A and Mohtar R H 2000 A hydro-spatial hierarchical method for siting water harvesting reservoirs in dry; Applied Engineering in Agriculture 16(4) 395–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant J C and Wilson J P 1996 TAPES-G: Agrid based terrain analysis program for the environmental sciences; Computers and Geosciences 22(7) 713–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geetha K, Mishra S K, Eldho T I, Rastogi A K and Pandey R P 2007 Modifications to SCS-CN Method for Long-Term Hydrologic Simulation; Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 133(5) 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydrologic Engineering Center 1990 HEC-I Flood Hydrograph Package: User’s Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hydrologic Engineering Center 2001 Hydrologic Modeling System, HEC-HMS: Differences Between HEC-HMS and HEC-1; US Army Corps of Engineers, CPD-74B, Mississippi, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMSD 1995 Integrated Mission for Sustainable Development: Technical Guidelines, NRSA, Hyderabad, India, 1–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Chatterjee C, Singh R D, Lohani A K and Sanjay Kumar 2007 Runoff estimation for an ungauged catchment using geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) models; Hydrol. Process. 21(14) 1829–1840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C H and Farmer I W 1990 A simple method of estimating rock mass porosity and permeability; International Journal of Mining and Geological Engineering 8 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levizzani V 1999 Precipitation estimates using METEOSAT second generation (MSG): New perspectives from geostationary orbit; Proc. 1999 EUMETSAT meteorological Satellite Data users’ conference. EUMETSAT, Copenhagen, Denmark, 121–128.

  • Lund J R 2006 Drought Storage Allocation Rules for Surface Reservoir Systems; J. Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, 0733–9496 395–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsik M and Waylen P 2006 An application of the distributed hydrologic model CASC2D to a tropical montane watershed; J. Hydrol. 330 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel C, Vazken A and Perrin C 2005 Soil Conservation Service Curve Number Method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure; Water Resources Research 41 W02 011, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S K and Singh V P 2003 Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology (Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer Academic Publishers) ISBN 1-4020-1132-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S K, Jain M K and Singh V P 2004 Evaluation of the SCS-CN-based model incorporating antecedent moisture; J. Water Resources Management 18 567–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S K, Jain M K, Pandey R P and Singh V P 2005 Catchment area based evaluation of the AMC-dependent SCS-CN-inspired rainfall-runoff models; Hydrol. Process. 19(14) 2701–2718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S K, Tyagi J V, Singh V P and Singh R 2006 SCS-CN-based modeling of sediment yield; J. Hydrol. 324 301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEH 1985 National Engineering Handbook Section 4-Hydrology, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmavathy A S, Ganesha Raj K, Yogarajan N and Thangavel P 1993 Check dam site selection using GIS approach, Adv. Space Res. 13(11) 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce V M and Hawkins R H 1996 Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? J. Hydrol. Engg. — ASCE 1(1) 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad K S S, Gopi S and Rao R S 1993 Watershed prioritization using remote sensing techniques — A case study of the Mahabubnagar District, Andhra Pradesh, India; Int. J. Remote Sensing 14 3239–3247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabus B, Einender M, Roth A and Balmer R 2003 The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) — A New Class Digital Elevation Models Acquired by Spaceborn Radar; ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 57(4) 241–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan D, Rao D H V and Tiwari K C 2008 Integrated approach of remote sensing and GIS in delineation of sites for water harvesting structures, Kali Watershed, Dohad, Gujarat, India: Geocarto International 23(2) 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao K H V D and Satish Kumar D 2004 Spatial Decision Support System for Watershed Management; Water Resources Management 18 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravishankar M N and Mohan G 2005 A GIS based hydrogeomorphic approach for identification of site-specific artificial-recharge techniques in the Deccan Volcanic Province; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 114(5) 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu R K, Mishra S K, Eldho T I and Jain M K 2007 An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method; Hydrol. Process. 21 2872–2881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider L E and McCuen R H 2005 Statistical guidelines for curve number generation; J. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-ASCE 131(3) 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settle J J and Briggs S S 1987 Fast maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed imagery; Int. J. Remote Sensing 8 723–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuebe M M and Johnston D M 1990 Runoff volume estimation using GIS techniques; Water Resources Bulletin 26(4) 611–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrach K M, Stieglitz H T, Mengelkamp and Raschke E 2002 Advantages of a topographically controlled runoff simulation in a soil vegetation-atmosphere transfer model; J. Hydrometeorol. 3 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolhiser D A, Smith R E and Goodrich D C 1990 KINEROS, Kinematic Runoff and Erosion Model: Documentation and User Manual. USDA-ARS, ARS 77, Washington D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusof K W, Serwan M and Baban J 2000 Identifying optimum sites for locating reservoirs employing remotely sensed data and geographical information systems; Proc. 21st Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, December 4–8, 2000, Taipei, Taiwan.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramakrishnan, D., Bandyopadhyay, A. & Kusuma, K.N. SCS-CN and GIS-based approach for identifying potential water harvesting sites in the Kali Watershed, Mahi River Basin, India. J Earth Syst Sci 118, 355–368 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-009-0034-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-009-0034-5

Keywords

Navigation