Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Eligibility for phase 3 clinical trials of systemic therapy in real-world patients with metastatic renal cell cancer managed in a rural region

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has identified disparities between urban and rural cancer care, including clinical trial access. Therefore, we addressed three different questions in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer managed according to national guidelines in a rural Norwegian standard practice setting. (1) How many patients would have been eligible for three recent landmark randomized clinical trials? (2) Is survival different between eligible and non-eligible patients receiving first-line systemic therapy? (3) Is survival different between eligible patients and published trial results? We performed a retrospective analysis of 101 consecutive patients (2006–2016). Only 52% of the patients were eligible for the first-line study of pazopanib versus sunitinib. The main reasons for violating inclusion or exclusion criteria were presence of brain metastases, absence of clear cell histology, and poor performance status. Even fewer patients were eligible for trials of nivolumab and cabozantinib in pre-treated patients. Eligible patients had significantly better survival than non-eligible patients, median 29.2 versus 8.5 months (p = 0.0001). These results confirm that many patients from rural practices do not fulfill all mandatory trial eligibility criteria. However, eligible patients managed according to national guidelines had survival outcomes in line with published first-line trial results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ. Systemic therapy for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:354–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rautiola J, Utriainen T, Peltola K, et al. Pazopanib after sunitinib failure in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stukalin I, Alimohamed N, Heng DY. Contemporary treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Rev. 2016;10:295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1803–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamel LM, Penner LA, Albrecht TL, et al. Barriers to clinical trial enrollment in racial and ethnic minority patients with cancer. Cancer Control. 2016;23:327–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruner DW, Pugh SL, Yeager KA, et al. Cartographic mapping and travel burden to assess and develop strategies to improve minority access to National Cancer Clinical Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93:702–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Lai GY, et al. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer. 2008;112:228–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Charlton M, Schlichting J, Chioreso C, et al. Challenges of rural cancer care in the United States. Oncology (Williston Park). 2015;29:633–40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baldwin LM, Cai Y, Larson EH, et al. Access to cancer services for rural colorectal cancer patients. J Rural Health. 2008;24:390–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:722–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T, et al. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1814–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Mazumdar M. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with stage IV renal cell carcinoma: memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:6302S–3S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell AP, Harrison MR, Walker MS, et al. Clinical trial participants with metastatic renal cell carcinoma differ from patients treated in real-world practice. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11:491–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beisland C, Johannesen TB, Klepp O, et al. Overall survival in renal cell carcinoma after introduction of targeted therapies: a Norwegian population-based study. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:371–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ta AD, Bolton DM, Dimech MK, et al. Contemporary management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Victoria: implications for longer term outcomes and costs. BJU Int. 2013;112(Suppl 2):36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manola J, Royston P, Elson P, et al. Prognostic model for survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the international kidney cancer working group. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:5443–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bastos DA, Molina AM, Hatzoglou V, et al. Safety and efficacy of targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma with brain metastasis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015;13:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nieder C, Spanne O, Nordøy T, Dalhaug A. Treatment of brain metastases from renal cell cancer. Urol Oncol. 2011;29:405–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keizman D, Rouvinov K, Sella A, et al. Is there a “trial effect” on outcome of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib? Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48:281–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, McCann L, et al. Overall survival in renal-cell carcinoma with pazopanib versus sunitinib. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1769–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, et al. Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3584–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hirsch BR, Harrison MR, George DJ, et al. Use of “Real-World” data to describe adverse events during the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in routine clinical practice. Med Oncol. 2014;31:156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miyake H, Miyazaki A, Harada K, Fujisawa M. Assessment of efficacy, safety and quality of life of 110 patients treated with sunitinib as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: experience in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Med Oncol. 2014;31:978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten Nieder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The study was performed as a retrospective quality of care study and therefore no ethical committee or Data Inspectorate approval was necessary. Consequently, no approval from the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK Nord) was necessary. Similarly, no approval from the Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD) was required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nieder, C., Syed, M.A., Dalhaug, A. et al. Eligibility for phase 3 clinical trials of systemic therapy in real-world patients with metastatic renal cell cancer managed in a rural region. Med Oncol 34, 149 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-017-1002-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-017-1002-6

Keywords

Navigation