Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High preoperative serum CA19-9 level is predictive of poor prognosis for patients with colorectal liver oligometastases undergoing hepatic resection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oligometastasis is defined as a transitional state between localized and widespread systemic metastatic cancers. In colorectal cancer, the prognostic factors and prognostic value of preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for patients with colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) undergoing hepatic resection have not been well explored. Therefore, the present study included 141 patients with CLOM (≤5 liver metastases) who underwent R0 resection from 2005 to 2012. The association of clinicopathological factors including preoperative CA19-9 and CEA levels with overall survival (OS) was analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with high CA19-9 levels tended to have poorer OS than those with low levels (median OS 21.5 vs. 64.0 months, P = 0.002). Preoperative CEA levels were not significantly associated with OS (P > 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that larger tumor size of liver metastases (HR 1.911; 95 % CI 1.172–3.114; P = 0.009), bilobar distribution (HR 1.776; 95 % CI 1.097–2.873; P = 0.019), and higher preoperative CA19-9 levels (HR 1.954; 95 % CI 1.177–3.242; P = 0.010) were independent predictors of poor OS for patients with CLOM. Our study identified tumor size, distribution, and preoperative CA19-9 levels as independent prognostic factors for OS of patients with CLOM. In particular, measurement of preoperative CA19-9 levels offers an easy tool that could help identify high-risk patients and aid in improving the management of patients with CLOM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–17. doi:10.3322/caac.21220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108. doi:10.3322/caac.21262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Reilly DA, Poston GJ. Colorectal liver metastases: current and future perspectives. Future Oncol. 2006;2(4):525–31. doi:10.2217/14796694.2.4.525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McNally SJ, Parks RW. Surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Dig Surg. 2013;30(4–6):337–47. doi:10.1159/000351442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallinger S, Biagi JJ, Fletcher GG, Nhan C, Ruo L, McLeod RS. Liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases. Curr Oncol. 2013;20(3):e255–65. doi:10.3747/co.20.1341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Akgul O, Cetinkaya E, Ersoz S, Tez M. Role of surgery in colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(20):6113–22. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nordlinger B, Guiguet M, Vaillant JC, Balladur P, Boudjema K, Bachellier P, et al. Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. A prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1254–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):309–18 (discussion 18–21).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Minagawa M, Makuuchi M, Torzilli G, Takayama T, Kawasaki S, Kosuge T, et al. Extension of the frontiers of surgical indications in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2000;231(4):487–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomlinson JS, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Kornprat P, Gonen M, et al. Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(29):4575–80. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adam R, Bhangui P, Poston G, Mirza D, Nuzzo G, Barroso E, et al. Is perioperative chemotherapy useful for solitary, metachronous, colorectal liver metastases? Ann Surg. 2010;252(5):774–87. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fcf3e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapman MA, Buckley D, Henson DB, Armitage NC. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen is related to tumour stage and long-term survival in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;78(10):1346–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gobbi PG, Valentino F, Berardi E, Tronconi C, Brugnatelli S, Luinetti O, et al. New insights into the role of age and carcinoembryonic antigen in the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(2):328–34. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamashita K, Watanabe M. Clinical significance of tumor markers and an emerging perspective on colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2009;100(2):195–9. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.01022.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lech G, Slotwinski R, Krasnodebski IW. The role of tumor markers and biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Neoplasma. 2014;61(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Levy M, Visokai V, Lipska L, Topolcan O. Tumor markers in staging and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. Neoplasma. 2008;55(2):138–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(1):8–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weichselbaum RR, Hellman S. Oligometastases revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8(6):378–82. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang JK, Kim MS, Kim JH, Yoo SY, Cho CK, Yang KM, et al. Oligometastases confined one organ from colorectal cancer treated by SBRT. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2010;27(4):273–8. doi:10.1007/s10585-010-9325-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1386–422. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ribero D, Vigano L, Amisano M, Capussotti L. Prognostic factors after resection of colorectal liver metastases: from morphology to biology. Future Oncol. 2013;9(1):45–57. doi:10.2217/fon.12.159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tzeng CW, Aloia TA. Colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(1):195–201. doi:10.1007/s11605-012-2022-3 (quiz p -2).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petrelli F, Coinu A, Zaniboni A, Pietrantonio F, Barni S. Prognostic factors after R0 resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: a systematic review and pooled-analysis. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2016;11(1):56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, Jessup JM, Kemeny N, Macdonald JS, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(33):5313–27. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Filella X, Molina R, Grau JJ, Pique JM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Astudillo E, et al. Prognostic value of CA 19.9 levels in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1992;216(1):55–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Franchi F, Pastore C, Izzo P, Calio E. Ca 19-9 in the monitoring of colorectal cancer after surgery. Med Oncol. 2001;18(3):237–8. doi:10.1385/MO:18:3:237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakayama T, Watanabe M, Teramoto T, Kitajima M. CA19-9 as a predictor of recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1997;66(4):238–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin PC, Lin JK, Lin CC, Wang HS, Yang SH, Jiang JK, et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is a valuable prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients with normal levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and may help predict lung metastasis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(10):1333–8. doi:10.1007/s00384-012-1447-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morita S, Nomura T, Fukushima Y, Morimoto T, Hiraoka N, Shibata N. Does serum CA19-9 play a practical role in the management of patients with colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(2):227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yakabe T, Nakafusa Y, Sumi K, Miyoshi A, Kitajima Y, Sato S, et al. Clinical significance of CEA and CA19-9 in postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(9):2349–56. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1004-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Araujo RL, Gonen M, Allen P, DeMatteo R, Kingham P, Jarnagin W, et al. Positive postoperative CEA is a strong predictor of recurrence for patients after resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(9):3087–93. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4358-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Takagawa R, Fujii S, Ohta M, Nagano Y, Kunisaki C, Yamagishi S, et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a predictive factor of recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(12):3433–9. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0168-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, Valeanu A, Castaing D, Azoulay D, et al. Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy: a model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):644–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang RF, Song BR, Peng JJ, Cai GX, Liu FQ, Wang MH, et al. The prognostic value of preoperative serum CEA and CA19-9 values in stage I–III colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61(132):994–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81101863) and Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program (No. 2013013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Binkui Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Zhenhai Lu, Jianhong Peng, and Zhiqiang Wang have contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Z., Peng, J., Wang, Z. et al. High preoperative serum CA19-9 level is predictive of poor prognosis for patients with colorectal liver oligometastases undergoing hepatic resection. Med Oncol 33, 121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0838-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0838-5

Keywords

Navigation