Abstract
Docetaxel is active in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma, and DCF (docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil) has shown good results in the neoadjuvant setting. Its high rate of grade 3–4 mucosal toxicity (stomatitis and diarrhea) has limited its widespread adoption. A more recent docetaxel-based triplet, FLOT (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) may be better tolerated. We conducted a pilot study of FLOT chemotherapy in EGJ adenocarcinoma patients and dysphagia to prospectively assess the rate of grade 3–4 mucosal toxicity and of pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Dysphagia and quality of life were measured with validated questionnaires. Ten patients were enrolled. Grade 3–4 mucosal toxicity rate was 0 %; pCR rate was 11 %; and near-complete pathological response rate 11 %. Dysphagia improvement or resolution was seen in 90 % of patients, and quality of life was stable before and after chemotherapy. FLOT is a safe and active neoadjuvant chemotherapy option for EGJ adenocarcinoma and should be compared to other standard regimens in randomized trials.
References
Cunningham D, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.
Ychou M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1715–21.
Ferri LE, et al. Perioperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) for locally advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(6):1512–7.
Van Cutsem E, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):4991–7.
Hacibekiroglu I, et al. Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX-6 and DCF regimens as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2015;3(5):1160–4.
Lorenzen S, et al. Feasibility of perioperative chemotherapy with infusional 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with (FLOT) or without (FLO) docetaxel in elderly patients with locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(3):519–26.
Becker K, et al. Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2003;98(7):1521–30.
Bergquist H, et al. Stent insertion or endoluminal brachytherapy as palliation of patients with advanced cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Dis Esophagus. 2005;18(3):131–9.
Cools-Lartigue J, et al. Management of dysphagia in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: can invasive tube feeding be avoided? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;22(6):1858–65.
Alcindor T, et al. Perioperative DCF chemotherapy protocol for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: correlation between response to treatment and outcome. Med Oncol. 2012;30(1):1–6.
Shah MA, et al. Randomized multicenter phase ii study of modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) versus DCF plus growth factor support in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: a study of the US gastric cancer consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(33):3874–9.
Schulz C, et al. NeoFLOT: multicenter phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma—very good response predominantly in patients with intestinal type tumors. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(3):678–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Fakeeh, A., Ferri, L., Mulla, N. et al. A pilot trial of FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Med Oncol 33, 62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0774-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0774-4