Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rural–urban disparities in use of post-lumpectomy radiation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We hypothesized that breast cancer (BCa) patients in urban counties would have higher rates of post-lumpectomy radiation therapy (RT) relative to patients in near-metro and rural counties. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify women diagnosed with BCa treated with lumpectomy in the Sacramento area between 2000 and 2006. Patient counties were categorized as urban and near-metro. Multivariate logistic regression models predicted treatment with RT. Likelihood of undergoing RT was reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Of 7,953 patients meeting entry criteria, 5,858 (73.7 %) underwent RT. On multivariate analysis, patients from near-metro (OR, 0.66; CI, 0.59–0.75; P < 0.001) and rural (OR 0.39, CI 0.30–0.52; P < 0.001) areas had a decreased likelihood of undergoing RT relative to patients from urban areas. Patients from near-metro and rural areas are less likely to receive RT following lumpectomy for BCa than their urban counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. 20-Year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(14):1143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, et al. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in small breast carcinoma: long-term results of a randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 2001;12(7):997–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moher D, Schachter HM, Mamaladze V, et al. Measuring the quality of breast cancer care in women. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004;105:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman CS, Shockney L, Rabinowitz B, et al. National Quality Measures for Breast Centers (NQMBC): a robust quality tool: breast center quality measures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(2):377–85.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buchholz TA, Theriault RL, Niland JC, et al. The use of radiation as a component of breast conservation therapy in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Centers. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):361–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hale NL, Bennett KJ, Probst JC. Diabetes care and outcomes: disparities across rural America. J Commun Health. 2010;35(4):365–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leira EC, Hess DC, Torner JC, Adams HP Jr. Rural-urban differences in acute stroke management practices: a modifiable disparity. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(7):887–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker P, Hoel D, Mohr L, Lipsitz S, Lackland D. Racial, age, and rural/urban disparity in cervical cancer incidence. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(7):466–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sonnenday CJ, Dimick JB, Schulick RD, Choti MA. Racial and geographic disparities in the utilization of surgical therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(12):1636–1646, discussion 1646.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Casper M, Nwaise I, Croft JB, Hong Y, Fang J, Greer S. Geographic disparities in heart failure hospitalization rates among medicare beneficiaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(4):294–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beal SH, Martinez SR, Canter RJ, Chen SL, Khatri VP, Bold RJ. Survival in 12,653 breast cancer patients with extensive axillary lymph node metastasis in the anthracycline era. Med Oncol. 2010;27(4):1420–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen SL, Martinez SR. The survival impact of the choice of surgical procedure after ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence. Am J Surg. 2008;196(4):495–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265(3):391–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatzell TA, Ricketts TC, Tropman SE, Paskett ED, Cooper MR. Rural physicians’ understanding of the state-of-the-art in breast, colon and rectum cancer treatment. Cancer Causes Control. 1999;10(4):261–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tropman SE, Ricketts TC, Paskett E, Hatzell TA, Cooper MR, Aldrich T. Rural breast cancer treatment: evidence from the Reaching Communities for Cancer Care (REACH) project. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999;56(1):59–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lazovich DA, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;266(24):3433–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Celaya MO, Rees JR, Gibson JJ, Riddle BL, Greenberg ER. Travel distance and season of diagnosis affect treatment choices for women with early-stage breast cancer in a predominantly rural population (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17(6):851–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Athas WF, Adams-Cameron M, Hunt WC, Amir-Fazli A, Key CR. Travel distance to radiation therapy and receipt of radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):269–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Du Xianglin L, Gor BJ. Racial disparities and trends in radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in women, 1992–2002. Ethn Dis Winter. 2007;17(1):122–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith GL, Shih YC, Xu Y, et al. Racial disparities in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a national Medicare study. Cancer 2010;116(3):734–41.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schootman M, Aft R. Rural-urban differences in radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;68(2):117–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandelblatt JS, Kerner JF, Hadley J, et al. Variations in breast carcinoma treatment in older medicare beneficiaries: is it black or white. Cancer. 2002;95(7):1401–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. California Department of Finance Statistical Abstract. 2009; http://www.dof.ca.gov/html/fs_data/stat-abs/Toc_xls.htm#top. Accessed 4–19, 2010.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Landgraf Memorial Research Award and Grant Number UL1 RR024146 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve R. Martinez.

Additional information

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/clinicalresearch/overview-translational.asp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinez, S.R., Shah, D.R., Tseng, W.H. et al. Rural–urban disparities in use of post-lumpectomy radiation. Med Oncol 29, 3250–3257 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0266-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0266-0

Keywords

Navigation