Abstract
We aimed to compare the survival benefit of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with conservative treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), furthermore, to reveal which PVTT types benefit from TACE treatment. From August 2007 to January 2010, a prospective controlled study was performed on consecutive patients with advanced HCC and PVTT. Of a total of 150 patients, 115 were treated with TACE (lipiodol and anticancer agents ± gelatin sponge embolization), and 35 who refused to accept the procedure were treated with conservative treatment. We performed survival analysis of the two treatment groups and then stratified by a new classification of PVTT that was divided into four types. Overall survival was significantly better in the TACE group than in the conservative group (8.67 months vs. 1.4 months, P < 0.001). The overall median survival for types I–IV PVTT were 12.0, 8.3, 5.0, and 2.43 months (P < 0.01). On subgroup analysis of PVTT, the median survival in the TACE group compared with conservative group for type I, II, III, and IV PVTT was 19.0 months versus 4.0 months, 11.0 months versus 1.43 months, 7.1 months versus 1.3 months, and 4.0 months versus 1.0 months, respectively (P < 0.01). The TACE group had significantly better survival than the conservative group for different extent of PVTT. TACE is an effective treatment mode compared with conservative treatment for HCC and PVTT and may provide a significantly better survival benefit for different extent of PVTT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108.
Bruix J, Llovet JM. Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:519–24.
Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19:329–38.
Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma: conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference. J Hepatol. 2001;35:421–30.
Llovet JM, Real MI, Montaña X, et al. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1734–9.
Lee H-S, Kim JS, Choi IJ, et al. The safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and main portal vein obstruction. Cancer. 1997;79:2087–94.
Georgiades CS, Hong K, D’Angelo M, Geschwind JF. Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1653–9.
Kim KM, Kim JH, Park IS, et al. Reappraisal of repeated transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:806–14.
Jang JW, Bae SH, Choi JY, et al. A combination therapy with transarterial chemo-lipiodolization and systemic chemo-infusion for large extensive hepatocellular carcinoma invading portal vein in comparison with conservative management. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007;59:9–15.
Wang J-H, Changchien C-S, Hu T-H, et al. The efficacy of treatment schedules according to Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging for hepatocellular carcinoma–survival analysis of 3892 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1000–6.
Luo J, Guo R-P, Lai ECH, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:413–20.
Shi J, Lai ECH, Li N, et al. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2073–80.
Shi J, Lai ECH, Li N, et al. A new classification for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:74–80.
Shu-qun C, Meng-chao W, Han C, et al. Significance of typing of tumor thrombi in determination of treatment and assessment of prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombi in the portal vein. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004;84:3–5.
Shuqun C, Mengchao W, Han C, et al. Tumor thrombus types influence the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with the tumor thrombi in the portal vein. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:499–502.
Lladó L, Virgili J, Figueras J, et al. A prognostic index of the survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Cancer. 2000;88:50–7.
Allgaier HP, Deibert P, Olschewski M, et al. Survival benefit of patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma treated by a combination of transarterial chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection–a single-center analysis including 132 patients. Int J Cancer. 1998;79:601–5.
Chen SC, Hsieh MY, Chuang WL, et al. Development of portal vein invasion and its outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transcatheter arterial chemo-embolization. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994;9:1–6.
Carr BI, Kondragunta V, Buch SC, et al. Therapeutic equivalence in survival for hepatic arterial chemoembolization and yttrium 90 microsphere treatments in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-cohort study. Cancer. 2010;116:1305–14.
Shi M, Chen J-A, Lin X-J, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization as initial treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in southern China. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:264–9.
Cabibbo G, Enea M, Attanasio M, et al. A meta-analysis of survival rates of untreated patients in randomized clinical trials of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2010;51:1274–83.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niu, ZJ., Ma, YL., Kang, P. et al. Transarterial chemoembolization compared with conservative treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: using a new classification. Med Oncol 29, 2992–2997 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-0145-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-0145-0