Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Subdividing the M1 stage of liver metastasis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma to better predict metastatic survival

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), the M1 stage of the TNM classification does not differentiate between the site of metastasis or the number of metastatic lesions. However, NPC patients with lung or bone metastases survive longer than do those with liver metastasis (LM). We subdivided the M1 stage of LM to better predict survival in these patients. From the records of 305 NPC patients with LM treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2000 and December 2007, we determined the effects of clinical characteristics and the subclassifications of the M1 stage for LM characteristics [the number, size, timing (synchronous vs. metachronous), and distribution of metastases and metastases to other organs] on survival since the diagnosis of LM. Metastatic survival rates were 62% at 1 year, 31% at 2 years, and 21% at 3 years. Having 1–3 metastatic lesions, having lesions less than 5 cm in diameter, and having unilobular LM were better univariate predictors of metastatic survival. Better survival was independently predicted by having one to three (vs. more than three) metastatic lesions (hazards ratio = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.33–0.82) and unilobular (vs. bilobular) lesions (hazards ratio = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.22–0.57). The current report constitutes large samples of LM from NPC from our single institution with correlation between LM characteristics and metastatic survival. Patients with NPC and one to three liver metastases or unilobular metastases survive longer than their counterparts, and aggressive treatment should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greene FL, Sobin LH. The staging of cancer: a retrospective and prospective appraisal. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:180–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gospodarowicz MK, Miller D, Groome PA, et al. The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification. Cancer. 2004;100:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leung SF, Teo PM, Shiu WW, et al. Clinical features and management of distant metastases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Otolaryngol. 1991;20:27–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng SH, Yen KL, Jian JJ, et al. Examining prognostic factors and patterns of failure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma following concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy: impact on future clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:717–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hui EP, Leung SF, Au JS, et al. Lung metastasis alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a relatively favorable prognostic group—a study by the Hong Kong nasopharyngeal carcinoma study group. Cancer. 2004;101:300–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee AW, Poon YF, Foo W, et al. Retrospective analysis of 5037 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during 1976–1985: overall survival and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:261–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Teo PML, Kwan WH, Lee WY, et al. Prognosticators determining survival subsequent to distant metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;77:2423–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gacani W, Bal IS, Babu MA, et al. Distant metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi. East Afr Med J. 2001;78:678–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ong YK, Heng DM, Chung B, et al. Design of a prognostic index score for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1535–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu MM, Tu SM. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. Clinical manifestations and results of therapy. Cancer. 1983;52:362–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang CJ, Leung SW, Lian SL, et al. Patterns of distant metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1996;12:229–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gillams AR, Lees WR. Five-year survival in 309 patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with radiofrequency ablation. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1206–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodrigus P, de Brouwer P, Raaymakers E. Brain metastases and non-small cell lung cancer. Prognostic factors and correlation with survival after irradiation. Lung Cancer. 2001;32:129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang CT, Cao KJ, Li Y, et al. Prognosis analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with distant metastasis. Ai Zheng. 2007;26:212–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fandi A, Bachouchi M, Azli N, et al. Long-term disease-free survivors in metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1324–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chou CW, Liu JM, Wu MF, et al. Prolonged survival in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient with multiple metastases: a case report and review of the literature. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1997;27:336–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Delis S, Biliatis I, Bouri A, et al. Surgical resection of a solitary liver metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case report. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2006;5:610–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddy SP, Raslan WF, Gooneratne S, et al. Prognostic significance of keratinization in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol. 1995;16:103–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Geara FB, Sanguineti G, Tucker SL, et al. Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of distant metastasis and survival. Radiother Oncol. 1997;43:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Tom Lang, of Tom Lang Communications and Training International, for his help in revising this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peihong Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, C., He, N., Zhao, M. et al. Subdividing the M1 stage of liver metastasis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma to better predict metastatic survival. Med Oncol 28, 1349–1355 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9643-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9643-8

Keywords

Navigation