Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of the efficacy of 99 mTc-DTPA scintigraphic GFR measurement with Gates method in the detection of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in comparison with plasma urea and creatinine measurement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the efficacy of 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphic analysis of GFR with the Gates method in comparison with the measurement of plasma urea and creatinine, in the detection of nephrotoxicity occurred in patients treated with cisplatin.Twenty-six male patients with a mean age of 26.73 ± 6.39 years (age range 15–42) who had seminomatous and nonseminomatous testicular carcinoma were included in our study. The patients received cisplatin with a dose of 20 mg/m2 per day for five consecutive days repeated every 21 days. Before starting chemotherapy, immediately after the end of four cycles of chemotherapy and 7 months after the beginning of chemotherapy, plasma urea and creatinine levels were measured and simultaneously scintigraphic GFR estimation using 99 mTc-DTPA with the Gates method was performed. In the measurements done immediately after the chemotherapy, in 18 of the 26 patients GFR levels decreased, in 4 of the 8 remaining patients GFR did not change, and in 4 patients there was an increase in the GFR levels. The changes in the averages of the plasma urea and creatinine levels between measurements done before and after the chemotherapy were not statistically significant. The decrease in the average of the GFR values immediately after chemotherapy, in comparison to the average of GFR values measured before chemotherapy, was found to be statistically significant with paired sample t test analysis (P < 0.009 with 95% CI). We concluded that scintigraphic GFR measurement using the Gates method with 99mTc-DTPA is a suitable method in the diagnosis of nephrotoxicity occuring due to cisplatine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skinner R, et al. Cisplatin dose rate as a risk factor for nephrotoxicity in children. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:1677–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brillet G, et al. Definitive end-stage chronic kidney failure after cisplatin treatment. Nephrologie. 1993;14:227–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cvitkovic E. Cumulative toxicities from cisplatin therapy and current cytoprotective measures. Cancer Treat Rev. 1998;24:265–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Daugaard G, et al. Renal tubular function in patients treated with high dose cisplatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;44:164–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lam M, Adelstein DJ. Hypomagnesemia and renal magnesium wasting in patients treated with cisplatin. Am J Kidney Dis. 1986;8:164–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guarino AM, et al. Platinate toxicity: past, present and prospect. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979;63:1475–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugiyama S, et al. Adverse effects of antitumor drug cisplatin on rat kidney mitochondria: disturbance in gluthatione peroxidase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;59:1121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bompart G. Cisplatin induced changes in cytochrome platin-450, lipid peroxidation and drug metabolising enzyme activities in rat kidney cortex. Toxicol Lett. 1989;48:193–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. De Witt LM, Jones TW, Moore L. Stimulation of the renal endoplasmic reticulum calcium pump: a possible biomarker for platinum toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1988;92:57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mavichak V, et al. Renal magnesium wasting and hypocalciuria in chronic cisplatin nephropathy in man. Clin Sci. 1988;75:203–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guyton CA. Textbook of medical physiology, Chap. 28. 8th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1991. p. 308–329.

  12. Schrier RW. editor. Manual of nephrology, Chap. 14, vol. 5. New York: Little Brown; 1990. p. 285–290.

  13. Dennis VW. Investigation of renal function. In Smith L, editor. Cecil textbook of medicine, Chap. 18, vol. 1. 18th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1988. p. 520-8.

  14. Mandal K, Anil Hebert, A Lee, editors. Renal diseases. Med Clinic North Am. 1990;74:859–1077.

  15. Stark JJ, Howell SB. Nephrotoxicity of cisplatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1978;23:461–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brillet G, et al. Long-term renal effect of cisplatin in man. Am J Nephrol. 1994;14(2):81–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schlegel JU, Hamway SA. Individual renal plasma flow determination in 2 minutes. J Urol. 1976;116:282–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gates GF. Glomerular filtration rate: Estimation from fractional accumulation of 99mTc-DTPA. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;3:565–70.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner H, Szabo Z, Buchanan J. Principles of Nuclear Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995. p. 966–73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petersen PM, Hansen SW. The course of long term toxicity in patients treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy for nonseminomatous germ cell cancer. Ann Oncol. 1999;12:1475–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filiz Özülker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özülker, F., Özülker, T., Uzun, A.K. et al. Investigation of the efficacy of 99 mTc-DTPA scintigraphic GFR measurement with Gates method in the detection of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in comparison with plasma urea and creatinine measurement. Med Oncol 28, 1101–1106 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9565-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9565-5

Keywords

Navigation