Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

WT1 peptide vaccination in a CML patient: induction of effective cytotoxic T lymphocytes and significance of peptide administration interval

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although antigen-specific immune responses including cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) against antigen peptide could be enhanced after tumor antigen peptide vaccinations, the immune responses do not necessarily result in a decrease or eradication of tumor cells in the vaccination trials. We focused on whether antigen-specific CTLs could be damaged by the repeated stimulation of antigenic peptide and whether regulatory T (Treg) cells would be increased by the administration of WT1 peptide. We administered WT1 peptide 22 times over 18 months in a CML patient who was being treated with imatinib. Although WT1 peptide administration every 2 weeks did not show any beneficial effects on the minimal residual disease (copies of bcr-abl transcripts), the transcripts remarkably decreased to the level of major molecular response after changing the administration interval of WT1 peptide from 2 to 4 weeks. An ex vivo study demonstrated that re-stimulation with WT1 peptide made WT1-specific T cells less reactive to WT1 tetramers and the impaired reactivity of CTLs lasted at least for 1 week. In addition, the cytotoxicity of the T cells was hampered by re-stimulation. Treg cells increased up to more than fivefold at the end of the WT1 administration period. The present findings suggested that the administration of the peptide every 4 weeks is superior to every 2 weeks. In addition, the findings that Treg cells increased gradually in accordance with the duration of WT1 peptide administration revealed the significance of manipulating Treg cells for establishing an efficient tumor antigen peptide vaccination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dauer M, Schnurr M, Eigler A. Dendritic cell-based cancer vaccination: quo vadis? Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008;7:1041–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oka Y, Tsuboi A, Oji Y, Kawase I, Sugiyama H. WT1 peptide vaccine for the treatment of cancer. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20:211–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Petrausch U, et al. Cancer immunotherapy: the role regulatory T cells play and what can be done to overcome their inhibitory effects. Curr Mol Med. 2009;9:673–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Demotte N, et al. Restoring the association of the T cell receptor with CD8 reverses anergy in human tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Immunity. 2008;28:414–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oka Y, et al. Development of WT1 peptide cancer vaccine against hematopoietic malignancies and solid cancers. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13:2345–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Izumoto S, et al. Phase II clinical trial of Wilms tumor 1 peptide vaccination for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:963–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oka Y, et al. Induction of WT1 (Wilms’ tumor gene)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by WT1 peptide vaccine and the resultant cancer regression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13885–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuboi A, et al. WT1 peptide-based immunotherapy for patients with lung cancer: report of two cases. Microbiol Immunol. 2004;48:175–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iiyama T, et al. WT1 (Wilms’ tumor 1) peptide immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma. Microbiol Immunol. 2007;51:519–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohta H, et al. WT1 (Wilms tumor 1) peptide immunotherapy for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: a case report. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009;26:74–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yasukawa M, et al. Clinical efficacy of WT1 peptide vaccination in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:314–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mailander V, et al. Complete remission in a patient with recurrent acute myeloid leukemia induced by vaccination with WT1 peptide in the absence of hematological or renal toxicity. Leukemia. 2004;18:165–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rezvani K, et al. Leukemia-associated antigen-specific T-cell responses following combined PR1 and WT1 peptide vaccination in patients with myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2008;111:236–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keilholz U, et al. A clinical and immunologic phase 2 trial of Wilms tumor gene product 1 (WT1) peptide vaccination in patients with AML and MDS. Blood. 2009;113:6541–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawakami M, et al. Clinical and immunologic responses to very low-dose vaccination with WT1 peptide (5 microg/body) in a patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2007;85:426–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsuboi A, et al. Wilms tumor gene WT1 peptide-based immunotherapy induced a minimal response in a patient with advanced therapy-resistant multiple myeloma. Int J Hematol. 2007;86:414–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oka Y, et al. Wilms tumor gene peptide-based immunotherapy for patients with overt leukemia from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MDS with myelofibrosis. Int J Hematol. 2003;78:56–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsuboi A, et al. Enhanced induction of human WT1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes with a 9-mer WT1 peptide modified at HLA-A*2402-binding residues. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2002;51:614–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karanikas V, et al. Monoclonal anti-MAGE-3 CTL responses in melanoma patients displaying tumor regression after vaccination with a recombinant canarypox virus. J Immunol. 2003;171:4898–904.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Furukawa T, et al. Establishment of a new cell line with the characteristics of a multipotential progenitor from a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia in early erythroblastic crisis. Leukemia. 1994;8:171–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Beyer M, Schultze JL. Regulatory T cells in cancer. Blood. 2006;108:804–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dannull J, et al. Enhancement of vaccine-mediated antitumor immunity in cancer patients after depletion of regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3623–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolf AM, et al. Increase of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood of cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:606–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Merlo A, et al. FOXP3 expression and overall survival in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1746–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chappert P, et al. Antigen-specific Tregs impair CD8 T cell priming by blocking early T cell expansion. Eur J Immunol. 2009.

  26. Demotte N, et al. A reversible functional defect of CD8 + T lymphocytes involving loss of tetramer labeling. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32:1688–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin RS, Rodriguez C, Veillette A, Lodish HF. Zinc is essential for binding of p56(lck) to CD4 and CD8alpha. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:32878–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lissina A, et al. Protein kinase inhibitors substantially improve the physical detection of T-cells with peptide-MHC tetramers. J Immunol Methods. 2009;340:11–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Morgan R, et al. N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (Mgat5)-mediated N-glycosylation negatively regulates Th1 cytokine production by T cells. J Immunol. 2004;173:7200–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Drs. Manabu Kawakami, Yoshihiro Oka and Haruo Sugiyama (Department of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan) for designing the protocol of the WT1 peptide vaccinations and giving us valuable advices for the study, and Drs. Shoko Takenouchi, Toshiki Kitajima and Tohri Ida (Division of Hematology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan) for treating the CML patients with WT1 peptide vaccination. We appreciate Dr. Susumu Suzuki (T cell Technology, Ina, Japan) for his generous advice in this study. We thank Dr. Kiyotaka Kuzushima (Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan) for kindly donating modified-type WT1 tetramers and HIV env tetramers and Dr. Shingo Toji (MBL, Ina, Nagano, Japan) for kindly donating FITC-labeled modified-type WT1 tetramers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masuhiro Takahashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saitoh, A., Narita, M., Watanabe, N. et al. WT1 peptide vaccination in a CML patient: induction of effective cytotoxic T lymphocytes and significance of peptide administration interval. Med Oncol 28, 219–230 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9425-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9425-3

Keywords

Navigation