Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lost expression of DCC gene in ovarian cancer and its inhibition in ovarian cancer cells

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related women mortality in China. In recent years, the molecular mechanisms involved in ovarian carcinoma development and/or progression have been intensely studied, and several genes have been identified. Deleted in Colorectal Carcinoma (DCC), is an important tumor suppressor gene, which is inactivated in many kinds of tumors, and its function(s) is not clarified. Even though the lost expression of DCC occurred in later stages of multistep colorectal carcinogenesis, its contribution to the onset or progression of ovarian cancer is not fully understood. To investigate DCC expression in ovarian cancer, we studied 254 clinical samples by RT–PCR. Our results revealed that 52% malignant ovarian cancer did not express DCC gene. By contrast, DCC expression was observed in all normal ovary tissues and 80% benign ovarian tumors. Obviously, there was a significant correlation between DCC expression and ovarian cancer, especially in the epithelial ovarian cancer. The present study also suggested that the loss expression of DCC occurred more frequently in the cases of later clinical stage, higher pathological grade, and poorer prognosis. In the other part of this study, we further explored DCC expression after transfection in two kinds of ovarian caner cell lines, namely SKOV3 cell and HO-8910 cell, using RT–PCR and immunocytochemistry. The results indicated that DCC expressed in SKOV3-DCC and HO-8910-DCC cells, and ultrastructural analysis showed the appearance of apoptotic features in them. Furthermore, cell growth was markedly down-regulated in above groups of cells, indicating that transfection with the DCC constructs can suppress the growth of tumor cells. In conclusion, our results suggest an association of lost expression of DCC with the ovarian cancer, and DCC gene may inhibit the growth of ovarian carcinoma cells. However, this result needs further trials with a larger sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bamias A, Yu Z, Weinberger PM, et al. Automated quantitative analysis of DCC tumor suppressor protein in ovarian cancer tissue microarray shows association with beta-catenin levels and outcome in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(12):1797–802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan L, Na W, Shan K, et al. p16(CDKN2) gene polymorphism: association with histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer in China. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18(1):30–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang XY, Yu H, Xi MR, et al. Association of the ARLTS1 variants with familial ovarian cancer risk in China. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(4):585–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wan T, Liu JH, Zheng LM, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor-associated macrophage infiltration in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Ai Zheng. 2009;28(3):323–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murph MM, Liu W, Yu S, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid-induced transcriptional profile represents serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma and worsened prognosis. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodrigues S, De Wever O, Bruyneel E, et al. Opposing roles of netrin-1 and the dependence receptor DCC in cancer cell invasion, tumor growth and metastasi. Oncogene. 2007;26(38):5615–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Martín M, Simon-Assmann P, Kedinger M, et al. DCC regulates cell adhesion in human colon cancer derived HT-29 cells and associates with ezrin. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006;85(8):769–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shin SK, Nagasaka T, Jung BH, et al. Epigenetic and genetic alterations in Netrin-1 receptors UNC5C and DCC in human colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(6):1849–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Derks S, Bosch LJ, Niessen HE, et al. Promoter CpG island hypermethylation- and H3K9me3 and H3K27me3-mediated epigenetic silencing targets the deleted in colon cancer (DCC) gene in colorectal carcinogenesis without affecting neighboring genes on chromosomal region 18q21. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(6):1041–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu JT, Kakar S, Nelson RL, et al. Prognostic significance of DCC and p27Kip1 in colorectal cancer. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2005;13(1):45–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klingelhutz AJ, Hedrick L, Cho KR, et al. The DCC gene suppresses the malignant phenotype of transformed human epithelial cells. Oncogene. 1995;10:1581–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujita M, Enomoto T, Murata Y. Genetic alterations in ovarian carcinoma: with specific reference to histological subtypes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;202:97–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fearon ER, Cho KR, Nigro JM, et al. Identification of a chromosome 18q gene that is altered in colorectal cancers. Science. 1990;247:49–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka K, Oshimura M, Kikuchi R, et al. Suppression of tumorigenicity in human colon carcinoma cells by introduction of normal chromosome 5 or 18. Nature. 1991;349:340–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saegusa M, Machida D, Okayasu I. Loss of DCC gene expression during ovarian tumorigenesis: relation to tumour differentiation and progression. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:571–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu J, Yao F, Wu R, et al. Mediation of the DCC apoptotic signal by DIP13 alpha. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:26281–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Takakura S, Okamoto A, Saito M, et al. Allelic imbalance in chromosome band 18q21 and SMAD4 mutations in ovarian cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1999;24:264–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chenevix-Trench G, Leary J, Kerr J, et al. Frequent loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 18 in ovarian adenocarinoma which does not always include the DCC locus. Oncogene. 1992;7:1059–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lassus H, Salovaara R, Aaltonen LA, et al. Allelic analysis of serous ovarian carcinoma reveals two putative tumor suppressor loci at 18q22–q23 distal to SMAD4, SMAD2, and DCC. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:35–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Forcet C, Ye X, Granger L, et al. The dependence receptor DCC (deleted in colorectal cancer) defines an alternative mechanism for caspase activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:3416–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwartz DR, Kardia SLR, Shedden KA, et al. Gene expression in ovarian cancer reflects both morphology and biological behavior, distinguishing clear cell from other poor-prognosis ovarian carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4722–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jen J, Kim H, Piantadosi S, et al. Allelic loss of chromosome 18q and prognosis in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:213–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Inoue T, Uchino S, Shiraishi N, et al. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 18q in cohesive-type gastric cancer is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:973–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tapper J, Sarantaus L, Vahteristo P, et al. Genetic changes in inherited and sporadic ovarian carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization: extensive similarity except for a difference at chromosome 2q24–q32. Cancer Res. 1998;58:2715–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pere H, Tapper J, Seppala M, et al. Genomic alterations in fallopian tube carcinomas: comparison to serous uterine and ovarian carcinomas reveals similarity suggesting likeness in molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res. 1998;58:4274–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu JR, Opipari AW, Tan L, et al. Dysfunctional apoptosome activation in ovarian cancer: implications for chemoresistance. Cancer Res. 2002;62:924–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof Li Baoxin of Harbin Medical University for her advice on our study and statistical analysis. This project was supported by a grant from the Provincial Government Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Changmin.

Additional information

Dr Liu Meimei now works as a post-doctoral in College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meimei, L., Peiling, L., Baoxin, L. et al. Lost expression of DCC gene in ovarian cancer and its inhibition in ovarian cancer cells. Med Oncol 28, 282–289 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-009-9400-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-009-9400-z

Keywords

Navigation