Skip to main content
Log in

Tumor burden status evaluated by computed tomography scan is of prognostic importance in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been discussed if computed tomography (CT) scan is necessary to perform or not, to provide prognostic information in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In the current National Institute Chronic lymphocytic leukemia Working Group (NCI-WG) guidelines, CT scan is not recommended outside clinical trials but states that further trials are warranted. Computed tomography scan of lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly was detected in totally 74 patients, leading to a modified Rai stage in 9 (12%) patients (from stage I to II). Using CT, 19 patients fulfilled the GELF high tumor burden criteria and/or one bulky node ≥7 cm. CT showed splenomegaly in totally 54 (73%) patients, of which 22 (41%) cases had not had been detected during clinical examination. According to the NCI response criteria for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 15 (22%) patients showed a CR and 43 (62%) a PR, while when including CT findings, 12 (17%) fulfilled criteria for CR and 41 (59%) for PR. Patients with a high lymphadenopathy tumor burden according to the GELF criteria at the time of initiation of first-line therapy had a shorter time from response to next therapy or death, 12 months compared with 35 months for patients with less advanced lymphadenopathy (P = 0.002). There was also a trend for a shorter overall survival in the high tumor burden group, 58 months compared to 75 months (P = 0.098). Massive splenomegaly was related to a shorter therapy-free as well as overall survival. In our opinion, clinical examination is not sufficient for evaluation of abdominal lymphnodes and spleen in patients with therapy requiring CLL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rai KR, et al. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1975;46:219–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Binet JL, et al. A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis. Cancer. 1981;48:198–206. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19810701)48:1<198:AID-CNCR2820480131>3.0.CO;2-V.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rai KR, Han T. Prognostic factors and clinical staging in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1990;4:447–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hallek M, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008;111:5446–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mavromatis BH, Cheson BD. Pre- and post-treatment evaluation of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Best Pract Clin Haematol. 2002;15:429–47. doi:10.1053/beha.2002.0217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Isasi CR, Lu P, Blaufox MD. A metaanalysis of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the staging and restaging of patients with lymphoma. Cancer. 2005;104:1066–74. doi:10.1002/cncr.21253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lundin J, et al. Phase II trial of subcutaneous anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) as first-line treatment for patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). Blood. 2002;100(3):768–73. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-01-0159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karlsson K, et al. Oral cladribine for B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: report of a phase II trial with a 3-d, 3-weekly schedule in untreated and pretreated patients, and a long-term follow-up of 126 previously treated patients. Br J Haematol. 2002;116:538–48. doi:10.1046/j.0007-1048.2001.03296.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Juliusson G, Liliemark J. Long-term survival following cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) therapy in previously treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ann Oncol. 1996;4:373–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Osterborg A, et al. Phase II multicenter study of human CD52 antibody in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. European Study Group of CAMPATH-1H treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1567–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Juliusson G, et al. Oral cladribine as primary therapy for patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2160–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheson BD, et al. National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood. 1996;87(12):4990–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheson BD, et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1244–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Solal-Celigny P, et al. Recombinant interferon alfa-2b combined with a regimen containing doxorubicin in advanced follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1608–14. doi:10.1056/NEJM199311253292203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moreton P, et al. Eradication of minimal residual disease in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia after alemtuzumab therapy is associated with prolonged survival. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2971–9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rawstron AC, et al. International standardized approach for flow cytometric monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukemia. 2007;21:956–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eichhorst BF, et al. Fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine alone in first-line therapy of younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:885–91. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-06-2395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Muntañola A, et al. Abdominal computed tomography predicts progression in patients with Rai stage 0 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1576–80. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maslak P, Caravelli J, Alban A, Chanan-Khan A. Complete remission in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is strongly affected by the use of CT scanning: Results from a prospective randomized trial of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) with or without genasense (Oblimersen) in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Blood 2006;108. ASH (Abstr nr 2834).

  20. Bosch F, et al. Computed tomography (CT) predicts response duration in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in complete response (CR) by conventional, NCI-working group, criteria. Blood 2006;108. ASH (Abstr nr 2835).

  21. Blum KA, et al. Computed tomography scans do not improve the predictive power of 1996 National Cancer Institute-sponsored working group chronic lymphocytic leukaemia response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5624–9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr Bo Nilsson for excellent help with statistical analysis and Mrs Leila Relander for excellent secretarial help, which is highly appreciated. This study was supported by the Cancer Society in Stockholm, the Swedish Cancer Society. The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeanette Lundin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norin, S., Kimby, E. & Lundin, J. Tumor burden status evaluated by computed tomography scan is of prognostic importance in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Med Oncol 27, 820–825 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-009-9292-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-009-9292-y

Keywords

Navigation