Abstract
For patients with docetaxel-resistant hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) no standard chemotherapeutic treatment exists. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of cyclophosphamide (CP)-based metronomic chemotherapy in this patient population. Patients with metastatic HRPC with disease progression under docetaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Secondary endpoints were survival and toxicity. Low-dose CP (50 mg/d) and dexamethasone (1 mg/d) were administered orally in a metronomic manner. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable side effects occurred. Seventeen patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 12 weeks (range: 4–60). Median age was 68 years (range: 42–85). Median PSA at study entry was 134 ng/ml (range: 46.0–6554). Nine patients had a PSA response (median 44.4%), four patients ≥50% and five patients <50%. Eight patients had a PSA progression. Overall survival was 24 months. Five patients reported a decrease in bone pain after 4 weeks' treatment. No grade 3 and 4 toxicities were noted. In this study, low-dose metronomically administered CP demonstrated efficacy as a second-line treatment in patients with docetaxel-resistant HRPC. The treatment was well tolerated and almost without toxicity. Further advantages of low-dose CP were its convenient oral administration, dosing schedule, low cost, and low-toxicity profile. These attributes in combination with immunoregulatory and antiangiogenic potentials make CP also a prime candidate for combination with other treatment regimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- HRPC:
-
Hormone-refractory prostate cancer
- CP:
-
Cyclophosphamide
- PSA:
-
Prostate-specific antigen
- ECOG:
-
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- NCI CTC:
-
National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria
- TSP1:
-
Thrombospondin-1
References
Yagoda A, Petrylak D. Cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced hormone-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer. 1993;71:1098–109. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<1098::AID-CNCR2820711432>3.0.CO;2-G.
Oudard S, Banu E, Beuzeboc P, et al. Multicenter randomized phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel, estramustine, and prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3343–51. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.12.187.
Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1513–20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa041318.
Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1502–12. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040720.
Nelius T, Klatte T, Yap R, et al. A randomized study of docetaxel and dexamethasone with - or high-dose estramustine for patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2006;98:580–5. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06324.x.
Nelius T, Reiher F, Lindenmeir T, et al. Characterization of prognostic factors and efficacy in a phase-II study with docetaxel and estramustine for advanced hormone refractory prostate cancer. Onkologie. 2005;28:573–8. doi:10.1159/000088297.
Chowdhury S, Burbridge S, Harper PG. Chemotherapy for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61:2064–70. doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01551.x.
Nicolini A, Mancini P, Ferrari P, et al. Oral -dose cyclophosphamide in metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer (MHRPC). Biomed Pharmacother. 2004;58:447–50.
Lord R, Nair S, Schache A, et al. Low dose metronomic oral cyclophosphamide for hormone resistant prostate cancer: a phase II study. J Urol. 2007;177:2136–40. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.143. discussion 2140.
Lutsiak ME, Semnani RT, De Pascalis R, et al. Inhibition of CD4(+)25 + T regulatory cell function implicated in enhanced immune response by -dose cyclophosphamide. Blood. 2005;105:2862–8. doi:10.1182/blood-2004-06-2410.
Damber JE, Vallbo C, Albertsson P, et al. The anti-tumour effect of -dose continuous chemotherapy may partly be mediated by thrombospondin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006;58:354–60. doi:10.1007/s00280-005-0163-8.
Hanahan D, Bergers G, Bergsland E. Less is more, regularly: metronomic dosing of cytotoxic drugs can target tumor angiogenesis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:1045–7. doi:10.1172/JCI9872.
Browder T, Butterfield CE, Kraling BM, et al. Antiangiogenic scheduling of chemotherapy improves efficacy against experimental drug-resistant cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1878–86.
Man S, Bocci G, Francia G, et al. Antitumor effects in mice of low-dose (metronomic) cyclophosphamide administered continuously through the drinking water. Cancer Res. 2002;62:2731–5.
Shaked Y, Emmenegger U, Francia G, et al. Low-dose metronomic combined with intermittent bolus-dose cyclophosphamide is an effective long-term chemotherapy treatment strategy. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7045–51. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0765.
Bubley GJ, Carducci M, Dahut W, et al. Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3461–7.
Beekman KW, Fleming MT, Scher HI, et al. Second-line chemotherapy for prostate cancer: patient characteristics and survival. Clin Prostate Cancer. 2005;4:86–90.
Hellerstedt B, Pienta KJ, Redman BG, et al. Phase II trial of oral cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and diethylstilbestrol for androgen-independent prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;98:1603–10. doi:10.1002/cncr.11686.
Brandes LJ, Bracken SP, Ramsey EW. N, N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine in combination with cyclophosphamide: an active, -toxicity regimen for metastatic hormonally unresponsive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1398–403.
Muss HB, Howard V, Richards F 2nd, et al. Cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced prostatic cancer: a randomized trial. Cancer. 1981;47:1949–53. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19810415)47:8<1949::AID-CNCR2820470806>3.0.CO;2-3.
Bracarda S, Tonato M, Rosi P, et al. Oral estramustine and cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic hormone refractory prostate carcinoma: a phase II study. Cancer. 2000;88:1438–44. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000315)88:6<1438::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-O.
Glode LM, Barqawi A, Crighton F, et al. Metronomic therapy with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone for prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;98:1643–8. doi:10.1002/cncr.11713.
Nishimura K, Nonomura N, Ono Y, et al. Oral combination of cyclophosphamide, uracil plus tegafur and estramustine for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Oncology. 2001;60:49–54. doi:10.1159/000055296.
Albertsson P, Lennernas B, Norrby K. Chemotherapy and antiangiogenesis: drug-specific effects on microvessel sprouting. Apmis. 2003;111:995–1003. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2003.apm1111102.x.
Nicholson B, Theodorescu D. Angiogenesis and prostate cancer tumor growth. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91:125–50. doi:10.1002/jcb.10772.
Hamano Y, Sugimoto H, Soubasakos MA, et al. Thrombospondin-1 associated with tumor microenvironment contributes to -dose cyclophosphamide-mediated endothelial cell apoptosis and tumor growth suppression. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1570–4. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3126.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank our colleagues in the department of oncology and urology for referring patients for this study. We are also indebted to our patients with prostate cancer for their continued participation in clinical trials. We also thank the research nurses and data managers for their assistance in the conduct of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelius, T., Klatte, T., de Riese, W. et al. Clinical outcome of patients with docetaxel-resistant hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with second-line cyclophosphamide-based metronomic chemotherapy. Med Oncol 27, 363–367 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-009-9218-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-009-9218-8