Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). This study seeks to examine education, income, and occupation variables separately to identify the single variable that can be best used to assess SES risk for GC.

Methods

Data from a case-control survey study were used. Logistic regression models were created for education, income, and occupation adjusted for age, sex, and race. Models were compared using AIC, c-statistics, and pseudo-R square to determine the model that had the highest risk predictive ability.

Results

GC cases had lower education levels and more commonly held jobs in unskilled labor. Annual household income was lower in cases compared to controls. Age, gender, race, education, and occupation were associated with increased risk of GC. The education model adjusted for age, gender, and race found < high school (HS) education to have an OR of 3.18 (95% CI 1.09–9.25) for GC compared to > HS education. The occupation model demonstrated that employment in unskilled labor had OR of 4.32 (95% CI 1.05–17.76) for GC compared to professional occupation. Model fit was best for the education model (AIC: 113.583, lower AIC is better) compared to income (117.562) or occupation (117.032). Education contributed the most to model variability (% delta pseudo-R square (4.7%)) compared to occupation (4.0%) or income (3.8%).

Conclusion

Education level was the single most reliable measure of GC risk among 3 SES variables and can be employed as an ideal single indicator of SES-related GC risk when multiple SES factors cannot be obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Cella DF, Orav EJ, Kornblith AB, Holland JC, Silberfarb PM, Lee KW, et al. Socioeconomic status and cancer survival. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9(8):1500–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Williams DR, Pamuk E. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(Suppl 1):S186–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shavers VL. Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(9):1013–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Howlader N, et al. Cancer stat facts: stomach cancer, SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2017. National Cancer Institute Suveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program 7/7/2020]; Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/stomach.html.

  5. Hong S, Won YJ, Park YR, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Lee ES, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2017. Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(2):335–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Katai H, et al. Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese gastric Cancer association (2001–2007). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(1):144–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fock KM. Review article: the epidemiology and prevention of gastric cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40(3):250–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim HJ, Lim SY, Lee JS, Park S, Shin A, Choi BY, et al. Fresh and pickled vegetable consumption and gastric cancer in Japanese and Korean populations: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Sci. 2010;101(2):508–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ren JS, Kamangar F, Forman D, Islami F. Pickled food and risk of gastric cancer--a systematic review and meta-analysis of English and Chinese literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2012;21(6):905–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ang TL, Fock KM. Clinical epidemiology of gastric cancer. Singap Med J. 2014;55(12):621–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandanos E, Lagergren J. Oestrogen and the enigmatic male predominance of gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(16):2397–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dong E, Duan L, Wu BU. Racial and ethnic minorities at increased risk for gastric cancer in a regional US population study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(4):511–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cavaleiro-Pinto M, Peleteiro B, Lunet N, Barros H. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cardia cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(3):375–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang JQ, Sridhar S, Chen Y, Hunt RH. Meta-analysis of the relationship between helicobacter pylori seropositivity and gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 1998;114(6):1169–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Eusebi LH, Laterza L, Cennamo V, Ceroni L, et al. Meta-analysis: can helicobacter pylori eradication treatment reduce the risk for gastric cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(2):121–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cammarota G, Larocca LM, D'Ugo D, Persiani R, Cianci R, Nocente R, et al. Synchronous gastric adenocarcinoma and MALT lymphoma in a patient with H. pylori infection. Could the two neoplasms share a common pathogenesis? Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48(37):104–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsson SC, Bergkvist L, Wolk A. Processed meat consumption, dietary nitrosamines and stomach cancer risk in a cohort of Swedish women. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(4):915–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A. Processed meat consumption and stomach cancer risk: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(15):1078–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uthman OA, Jadidi E, Moradi T. Socioeconomic position and incidence of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(10):854–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu CC, Hsu TW, Chang CM, Yu CH, Wang YF, Lee CC. The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiseman M. The second World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research expert report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67(3):253–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de Martel C, Forman D, Plummer M. Gastric cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2013;42(2):219–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagel G, Linseisen J, Boshuizen HC, Pera G, del Giudice G, Westert GP, et al. Socioeconomic position and the risk of gastric and oesophageal cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC-EURGAST). Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(1):66–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fontana V, Decensi A, Orengo MA, Parodi S, Torrisi R, Puntoni R. Socioeconomic status and survival of gastric cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(4):537–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Newnham A, Quinn MJ, Babb P, Kang JY, Majeed A. Trends in oesophageal and gastric cancer incidence, mortality and survival in England and Wales 1971-1998/1999. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(5):655–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta S, et al. Race/ethnicity-, socioeconomic status-, and anatomic subsite-specific risks for gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(1):59–62.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. In H, et al. Can a gastric cancer risk survey identify high-risk patients for endoscopic screening? A pilot study. J Surg Res. 2018;227:246–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;19(6):716–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Caetano SJ, Sonpavde G, Pond GR. C-statistic: a brief explanation of its construction, interpretation and limitations. Eur J Cancer. 2018;90:130–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagelkerke NJ. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991;78(3):691–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hosmer, D.W., S. Lemeshow, and R.X. Sturdivant, Applied logistic regression. 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Wolfinger R, O'Connell M. Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simul. 1993;48(3–4):233–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:341–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lagergren J, Andersson G, Talbäck M, Drefahl S, Bihagen E, Härkönen J, et al. Marital status, education, and income in relation to the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer by histological type and site. Cancer. 2016;122(2):207–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parent ME, Siemiatycki J, Fritschi L. Occupational exposures and gastric cancer. Epidemiology. 1998;9(1):48–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ekstrom AM, et al. Occupational exposures and risk of gastric cancer in a population-based case-control study. Cancer Res. 1999;59(23):5932–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Engel LS, Vaughan TL, Gammon MD, Chow WH, Risch HA, Dubrow R, et al. Occupation and risk of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Am J Ind Med. 2002;42(1):11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hemminki K, Zhang H, Czene K. Socioeconomic factors in cancer in Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2003;105(5):692–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(12):3030–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lunet N, Valbuena C, Vieira AL, Lopes C, Lopes C, David L, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and gastric cancer by location and histological type: case-control and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007;16(4):312–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ladeiras-Lopes R, Pereira AK, Nogueira A, Pinheiro-Torres T, Pinto I, Santos-Pereira R, et al. Smoking and gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(7):689–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vohra J, Marmot MG, Bauld L, Hiatt RA. Socioeconomic position in childhood and cancer in adulthood: a rapid-review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(6):629–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: national longitudinal mortality study. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(4):417–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by UG1CA189823 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology NCORP Grant). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Srawani Sarkar: Writing, original draft; review and editing; visualization, validation. Marc J. Dauer: Writing, original draft preparation. Haejin In: Conceptualization; formal analysis; supervision; writing, review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haejin In.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by Albert Einstein College of Medicine IRB (IRB# 2015-4763). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code Availability

Available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Descriptive statistics of family history, BMI, smoking, and alcohol intake
Table 6 Comparisons of model fit with different variable to represent SES (models including family history, BMI, smoking, and alcohol intake)
Table 7 Relative contribution of SES variables to the explanatory power of the model, including family history, BMI, smoking and alcohol intake
Table 8 Multivariable model comparisons using different variables to represent SES (family history, BMI, smoking, and alcohol intake also included in models)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarkar, S., Dauer, M.J. & In, H. Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk. J Gastrointest Canc 53, 170–178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-020-00564-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-020-00564-z

Keywords

Navigation