Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of Laparoscopic Assisted Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Exophytic Versus Non-exophytic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and is the third cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgery is the optimal treatment for early HCC; however, the majority of cases are not suitable for curative resection at the time of diagnosis. Surgical resection difficulties may be related to size, site, number of tumors, extrahepatic involvement, and patient general condition. Exophytic tumors were considered as relative contraindication for thermal ablation because of the risk of incomplete ablation or major complications as hemorrhage and seeding. Aim of this study: to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) of exophytic HCC in comparison with non-exophytic HCC.

Methods

Prospective comparative study carried on 30 patients having 30 exophytic (six of those patients had another non-exophytic lesion) and 32 patients having 44 non-exophytic HCC lesions (22 had single lesion, 8 patients had 2 lesions, and 2 patients had 3 lesions) within Milan criteria. All patients were child A or B, they were subjected to full clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, and radiological investigations. Laparoscopic assisted percutaneous MWA was the procedure of choice in our study for all patients either having exophytic or non-exophytic lesions using no-touch wedge technique for exophytic lesions and direct puncture for non-exophytic lesions.

Results

Technical success was 100% in both groups, all lesions were completely ablated as confirmed by LIOUS. There were no major complications or perioperative mortality and low incidence of local tumor progression in both exophytic and non-exophytic groups.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic assisted MWA of exophytic HCC is safe and effective with comparable results to non-exophytic HCC. Exophytic HCC is not contraindication for MWA with proper technique selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Cleries R, Diaz M. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis. 2005;9:191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cho YK, Kim JK, Kim WT, Chung JW. Hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for very early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model analysis. Hepatology. 2010;51:1284–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rust C, Gores GJ. Locoregional management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgical and ablation therapies. Clin Liver Dis. 2001;5:161–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee WS, Yun SH, Chun HK, Lee WY, Kim SJ, Choi SH, et al. Clinical outcomes of hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation in patients with solitary colorectal liver metastasis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:945–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulier S, Ruers T, Jamart J, Michel L, Marchal G, Ni Y. Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases: time for a randomized trial? An update. Dig Surg. 2008;25:445–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet JM, Vilana R, Brú C, Bianchi L, Salmeron JM, Boix L, et al. Barcelona Clínic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group. Increased risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2001;33(5):1124–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho CS, Ossip M, Wong F, Sherman M, Grant DR, Greig PD, et al. Needle tract seeding after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16(4):485–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patidar Y, Singhal P, Gupta S, Mukund A, Sarin SK. Radiofrequency ablation of surface v/s intraparenchymal hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2017;27(4):496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel PA, Ingram L, Wilson ID, Breen DJ. No-touch wedge ablation technique of microwave ablation for the treatment of subcapsular tumors in the liver. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(8):1257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brace CL. Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009;38:135–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon CJ, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Microwave ablation: principles and applications. Radiographics. 2005;25(Suppl 1):S69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu NC, Raman SS, Kim YJ, Lassman C, Chang X, Lu DS. Microwave liver ablation: influence of hepatic vein size on heat-sink effect in a porcine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:1087–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni MF, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Goldberg SN. Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study. Radiology. 2003;226:441–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rhim H, Yoon KH, Lee JM, Cho Y, Cho JS, Kim SH, et al. Major complications after radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatic tumors: Spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics. 2003;23:123–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meloni MF, Goldberg SN, Moser V, Piazza G, Livraghi T. Colonic perforation and abscess following radiofrequency ablation treatment of hepatoma. Eur J Ultrasound. 2002;15:73–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mulier S, Mulier P, Ni Y, Miao Y, Dupas B, Marchal G, et al. Complications of radiofrequency coagulation of liver tumors. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1206–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Komorizono Y, Oketani M, Sako K, Yamasaki N, Shibatou T, Maeda M, et al. Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Cancer. 2003;97(5):1253–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mogahed M, ElWakeel B, ElKholy A, Abdellatif WM, Zytoon AA, Manaa M, et al. Laparoscopic assisted percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma close to large hepatic vessels. J Surg. 2019;7(5):132–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang TW, Lim HK, Lee MW, Kim YS, Rhim H, Lee WJ, et al. Long-term therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for subcapsular versus nonsubcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched study. Radiology. 2016;280(1):300–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Worakitsitisatorn A, Lu DS, Lee MW, Asvadi NH, Moshksar A, Yuen AD, et al. Percutaneous thermal ablation of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinomas: influence of tumor-surface contact and protrusion on therapeutic efficacy and safety. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(3):1813–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Francica G, Meloni MF, de Sio I, Smolock AR, Brace CL, Iadevaia MD, et al. Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma accessed by direct puncture: Safety and efficacy. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(4):739–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Guarantor of integrity of the entire study: all authors.

Study concepts and design: all authors.

Literature research: all authors.

Clinical studies: all authors.

Data analysis: all authors.

Statistical analysis: all authors.

Manuscript preparation: all authors.

Manuscript editing: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashraf Anas Zytoon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board (IRB). Informed written consent was obtained from the patients.

Research Involving Human Participants

Institution ethical approval obtained.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

All authors gave a consent to publish the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mogahed, M.M., Zytoon, A.A., Eysa, B. et al. Outcome of Laparoscopic Assisted Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Exophytic Versus Non-exophytic Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Gastrointest Canc 52, 892–898 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-020-00477-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-020-00477-x

Keywords

Navigation