Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Structure and Outcomes of Educational Programs for Training Non-electroencephalographers in Performing and Screening Adult EEG: A Systematic Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To qualitatively and quantitatively summarize curricula, teaching methods, and effectiveness of educational programs for training bedside care providers (non-experts) in the performance and screening of adult electroencephalography (EEG) for nonconvulsive seizures and other patterns.

Methods

PRISMA methodological standards were followed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, WOS, Scopus, and MedEdPORTAL databases were searched from inception until February 26, 2020 with no restrictions. Abstract and full-text review was completed in duplicate. Studies were included if they were original research; involved non-experts performing, troubleshooting, or screening adult EEG; and provided qualitative descriptions of curricula and teaching methods and/or quantitative assessment of non-experts (vs gold standard EEG performance by neurodiagnostic technologists or interpretation by neurophysiologists). Data were extracted in duplicate. A content analysis and a meta-narrative review were performed.

Results

Of 2430 abstracts, 35 studies were included. Sensitivity and specificity of seizure identification varied from 38 to 100% and 65 to 100% for raw EEG; 40 to 93% and 38 to 95% for quantitative EEG, and 95 to 100% and 65 to 85% for sonified EEG, respectively. Non-expert performance of EEG resulted in statistically significant reduced delay (86 min, p < 0.0001; 196 min, p < 0.0001; 667 min, p < 0.005) in EEG completion and changes in management in approximately 40% of patients. Non-experts who were trained included physicians, nurses, neurodiagnostic technicians, and medical students. Numerous teaching methods were utilized and often combined, with instructional and hands-on training being most common.

Conclusions

Several different bedside providers can be educated to perform and screen adult EEG, particularly for the purpose of diagnosing nonconvulsive seizures. While further rigorous research is warranted, this review demonstrates several potential bridges by which EEG may be integrated into the care of critically ill patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Claassen J, Vespa P. Electrophysiologic monitoring in acute brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21:S129–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, et al. Consensus statement on continuous eeg in critically ill adults and children. Part I: Indications J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32:87–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, et al. Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, Part II: Personnel, technical specifications, and clinical practice. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32:96–108.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Claassen J, Taccone FS, Horn P, et al. Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1337–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gavvala J, Abend N, LaRoche S, et al. Continuous EEG monitoring: a survey of neurophysiologists and neurointensivists. Epilepsia. 2014;55(11):1864–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, et al. Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients. Neurology. 2004;62(10):1743–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kramer AH, Jette N, Pillay N, et al. Epileptiform activity in neurocritical care patients. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012;39:328–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Claassen J, Perotte A, Albers D, et al. Nonconvulsive seizures after subarachnoid hemorrhage: multimodal detection and outcomes. Ann Neurol. 2013;74:53–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vespa PM, McArthur DL, Xu Y, et al. Nonconvulsive seizures after traumatic brain injury are associated with hippocampal atrophy. Neurology. 2010;75:792–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vespa PM, Miller C, McArthur D, et al. Nonconvulsive electrographic seizures after traumatic brain injury results in a delayed, prolonged increase in intracranial pressure and metabolic crisis. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(12):2830–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vespa PM, O’Phelan K, Shah M, et al. Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: a factor in progressive midlines shift and outcome. Neurology. 2003;60:1441–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vespa PM, Martin NA, Nenov V, et al. Delayed increase in extracellular glycerol with post-traumatic electrographic epileptic activity: support for the theory that seizures induce secondary injury. Acta Neurochir. 2002;Suppl 81:355–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kramer AH, Kromm J. Quantitative continuous EEG: bridging the gap between the ICU bedside and the EEG interpreter. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30:499–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McKay JH, Feyissa AM, Sener U, et al. Time is brain: the use of electrode caps to rapidly diagnose nonconvulsive status epilepticus. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;36(6):460–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gururangan K, Razavi B, Parvizi J. Diagnostic utility of eight-channel EEG for detecting generalized or hemispheric seizures and rhythmic periodic patterns. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2018;3:65–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Manez Miro JU, Diaz de Teran FJ, Singer A, et al. Emergency electroencephalogram: Usefulness in the diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus by the on-call neurologist. Neurologia. 2018;33(2):71–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bubrick EJ, Bromfield EB, Dworetzky BA. Utilization of below-the-hairline EEG in detecting subclinical seizures. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2010;41(1):15–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karakis I, Montouris GD, Otis JAD, et al. A quick and reliable EEG montage for the detection of seizures in the critical care setting. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;27(2):100–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ladino LD, Voll A, Dash D, et al. StatNet electroencephalogram: a fast and reliable option to diagnose nonconvulsive status epilepticus in emergency setting. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43(2):254–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yazbeck M, Sra P, Parvizi J. Rapid response electroencephalography for urgent evaluation of patients in community hospital intensive care practice. J Neurosci Nurs. 2019;51(6):308–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hobbs K, Krishnamohan P, Legault C, et al. Rapid bedside evaluation of seizures in the ICU by listening to the sound of brainwaves: a prospective observational clinical trial of Ceribell’s brain stethoscope function. Neurocrit Care. 2018;29:302–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parvizi J, Gururangan K, Rasavi B, et al. Detecting silent seizures by their sounds. Epilepsia. 2018;59:877–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khamis H, Mohamed A, Simpson S, et al. Detection of temporal lobe seizures and identification of lateralisation from audified EEG. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:1714–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scheuer ML, Wilson SB. Data analysis for continuous EEG monitoring in the ICU: seeing the forest and the trees. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21(5):353–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluated healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Levitt HM. Considerations of how to conduct a qualitative meta-analysis: Tailoring methods to enhance methodological integrity. Psychother Res. 2018;28(3):367–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharma R, Gordon M, Dharamsi S, et al. Systematic reviews in medical education: a practical approach: AMEE Guide 94. Med Teach. 2015;37(2):108–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. EndNote X7, editor. EndNote X7 ed. New York, NY: Thomas Reuters; 2016.

  29. Britton JW, Frey LC, Hopp JL, et al. Electroencephalography (EEG): an introductory text and atlas of normal and abnormal findings in adults, children, and infants. 2016 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK390356/. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  30. Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel [Internet] 2020, v16.42. Available at: https://office.microsoft.com/excel.

  32. Kromm J, Waechter J, Kramer A. Development of and EEG curriculum for ICU nurses to facilitate real time screening of continuous EEG data for seizures in critically ill adults. Can J Neurol Sci. 2017;44(supp 2):S26.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Benson R, Mendiratta A, Patel S, et al. A mobile electroencephalogram (EEG) tutorial atlas as a learning tool for neurology residents. Neurology. 2018;90(15 supp):P3.334.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Barratt D, Mader E, Gutierrez A et al. (2015) EEG and sleep team-based learning. MedEdPORTAL. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10071

  35. Pauri F, Pierelli F, Chatrian G, et al. Long-term EEG-video-audio monitoring: computer detection of focal EEG seizure patterns. EEG Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;82:1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. You KM, Suh GJ, Kwon WY, et al. Epileptiform discharge detection with the 4-channel frontal electroencephalography during post-resuscitation care. Resus. 2017;117:8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lybeck A, Cronberg T, Borgquist O, et al. Beside interpretation of simplified continuous EEG after cardiac arrest. Acta Anesth Scand. 2020;64:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kang JH, Sherill GC, Sinha SR, et al. A trial of real-time electrographic seizure detection by neuro-ICU nurses using a panel of quantitative EEG trends. Neurocrit Care. 2019;31:312–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ding JZ, Mallick R, Carpentier J. Resident training and interrater agreements using the ACNS critical care EEG terminology. Seizure. 2019;66:76–80.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Amorim E, Williamson CA, Moura LMVR, et al. Performance of spectrogram-based seizure identification of adult EEGs by critical care nurses and neurophysiologists. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34(4):359–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Citerio G, Patruno A, Beretta S, et al. Implementation of continuous qEEG in two neurointensive care units by intensivists: a feasibility study. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(7):1067–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Herta J, Koren J, Furbass F, et al. Applicability of NeuroTrend as a bedside monitor in the neuro ICU. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:1000–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Swisher CB, White CR, Mace BE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of electrographic seizure detection by neurophysiologists and non-neurophysiologists in the adult ICU using a panel of quantitative EEG trends. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32(4):324–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dericioglu N, Yetim E, Bas DF, et al. Non-expert use of quantitative EEG displays for seizure identification in the adult neuro-intensive care unit. Epilepsy Res. 2015;109:48–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Seiler L, Fields J, Peach E, et al. The effectiveness of a staff education program on the use of continuous EEG with patients in neuroscience intensive care units. J Neurosci Nurs. 2012;44(2):E1-5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Young GB, Doig GS. Continuous EEG monitoring in comatose intensive care patients. Neurocrit Care. 2005;2:5–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jordan KG. Continuous EEG and evoked potential monitoring in the neuroscience intensive care Unit. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;10(4):445–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zehtabchi S, Baki SGA, Omurtag A, et al. Effect of MicroEEG on clinical management and outcomes of emergency department patients with altered mental status: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:283–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Nitzschke R, Muller J, Engelhardt R, et al. Single-Channel amplitude integrated EEG recording for the identification of epileptic seizures by nonexpert physicians in the adult acute care setting. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25:329–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Eldoen G. Holberg score EEG used as an education tool in daily practice. Epilepsia. 2018;59(supp 3):S64.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dericioglu N, Ozdemir P. The Success Rate of Neurology Residents in EEG Interpretation After Formal Training. Clin EEG and Neurosci. 2018;49(2):136–40.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Clary HM. Impact of epilepsy curriculum redesign and milestone self-assessment in neurology residency. Neurology. 2017;88(16supp):P1.044.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Leira EC, Bertrand ME, Hogan RE, et al. Continuous or emergent EEG: can bedside caregivers recognize epileptiform discharges? Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:207–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Weber D, McCarthy D, Pathmanatha J. An effective automated method for teaching EEG interpretation to neurology residents. Seizure. 2016;40:10–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Moeller J, Farooque P, Leydon G, et al. MedEdPORTAL. 2017;12:10570. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hughes S, Finnegan T, Benbadis S. Improving diagnostic accuracy in epilepsy: effect of online medical education on EEG interpretation among neurologists. Neurology. 2018;90(15):P3.260.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sutter R, Marsch S, Fuhr P, et al. Anesthetic drugs in status epilepticus: risk or rescue? A 6-year cohort study. Neurology. 2014;82(8):656–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Struck AF, Rodriguez-Ruiz AA, Osman G, et al. Comparison of machine learning models for seizure prediction in hospitalized patients. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurol. 2019;6(7):1239–47.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sackellares JC, Shiau D, Halford JJ, et al. Quantitative EEG analysis for automated detection of nonconvulsive seizures in intensive care units. Epilepsy Behav. 2011;22:S69–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Alkhachroum A, Terilli K, Megjhani M, et al. Harnessing big data in neurocritical care in the era of precision medicine. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2020;22:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-020-00622-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Jette N, Claassen J, Emerson RG, et al. Frequency and predictors of nonconvulsive seizures during continuous electroencephalographic monitoring in critically ill children. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1750–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. van Putten MJAM, Hofmeijer J. EEG monitoring in cerebral ischemia: basic concepts and clinical applications. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33(3):203–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lauritzen M, Dreier JP, Fabricius M, et al. Clinical relevance of cortical spreading depression in neurological disorders: migraine, malignant stroke, subarachnoid and intracranial hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:17–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Robba C, Bacigaluppi S, Cardim D, et al. Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure. Acta Neuro Scand. 2016;134:4–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Claassen J, Doyle K, Matory A, et al. Detection of brain activation in unresponsive patients with acute brain injury. NEJM. 2019;380(26):2497–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Muhlhofer W, Szaflarski JP. Prognostic value of EEG in patients after cardiac arrest—an updated review. Cur Neurol and Neurosci Rep. 2018;18(4):16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0826-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Haveman ME, Van Putten MJAM, Hom HW, et al. Predicting outcome in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury using electroencephalography. Crit Care. 2019;23:401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2656-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Claassen J, Hirsch LJ, Frontera JA, et al. Prognostic significance of continuous EEG monitoring in patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2006;4:103–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, et al. Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Evid Rep/Technol Assess. 2007;149:1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Mansouri M, Lockyer J. A meta-analysis of continuing medical education effectiveness. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27:6–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, et al editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. Baltimore Maryland: John Hopkins University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Chen W, Reeves TC. Twelve tips for conducting educational design research in medical education. Med Teach. 2020;42(9):980–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Mukhalalati BA, Taylor A. Adult learning theories in context: a quick guide for healthcare professional educators. J Med Educ and Curric Dev. 2019;6:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Munro K. Continuing professional development and the charity paradigm: interrelated individual, collective and organisational issues about continuing professional development. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28:953–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gould D, Drey N, Berridge EJ. Nurses’ experiences of continuing professional development. Nurs Ed Today. 2007;27:602–9.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Griscti O, Jacono J. Effectiveness of continuing education programmes in nursing: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;55(4):449–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Pusic MV, Boutis K, Hatala R, et al. Learning curves in health professions education. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1034–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Xurong (Rachel) Zhao for development of search strategies and performing literature searches. Thank you to Dr. Chip Doig and other peer reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Julie Kromm contributed to conception and design of project, acquisition and interpretation of data, drafting and critically revising manuscript for intellectual content and has approved the final version of manuscript. Kirsten Fiest contributed to conception and design of project, acquisition of data, critically revising manuscript for intellectual content and has approved the final version of manuscript. Ayham Alkhachroum contributed to acquisition and interpretation of data, critically revising manuscript for intellectual content and has approved the final version of manuscript. Colin Josephson contributed to conception and design of project, acquisition of data, critically revising manuscript for intellectual content and has approved the final version of manuscript. Andreas Kramer contributed to conception and design of project, critically revising manuscript for intellectual content and has approved the final version of manuscript. Nathalie Jette contributed to conception and design of project, critically revising manuscript for intellectual content and has approved the final version of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Kromm.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

Dr. Kromm reports grants from the University of Calgary Postgraduate Medical Education Office, grants from the University of Calgary Office of Health and Medical Education Scholarship, outside the submitted work. Dr. Alkhachroum is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under the Miami CTSI KL2 Career Development Award UL1TR002736. Dr Kirsten Fiest, Dr. Colin Josephson, Dr Andreas Kramer, and Dr Nathalie Jette have nothing to disclose.

Ethics approval

As a systematic review, this work did not require ethics approval.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Search Strategy and List of Data Extracted From Studies

MEDLINE Search Strategy

1

exp electroencephalography/

2

electroencephalogra*.mp

3

EEG*.mp

4

Spectral array*.mp

5

(brain adj1 activit*).mp

6

brain wave*.mp

7

brainwave*.mp

8

electrocorticograph*.mp

9

ECOG*.mp

10

Alpha rhythm*.mp

11

Beta rhythm*.mp

12

Delta rhythm*.mp

13

Gamma rhythm*.mp

14

Theta rhythm*.mp

15

or/1–14

16

exp Education/

17

educat*.mp

18

teach*.mp

19

train*.mp

20

instruct*.mp

21

workshop*.mp

22

or/16–21

23

15 and 22

24

exp Electroencephalography/ed [Education]

25

23 or 24

26

exp Epilepsy/

27

exp Seizures/

28

epilep*.mp

29

seizure*.mp

30

convulsion*.mp

31

or/26–30

32

interpret*.mp

33

exp Diagnosis/

34

diagnos*.mp

35

di.fs

36

or/32–35

37

adolescent/

38

exp Adult/

39

adolescen*.mp

40

teen*.mp

41

youth*.mp

42

adult*.mp

43

aged.mp

44

elderly.mp

45

senior*.mp

46

or/37–45

47

15 and 25 and 31 and 36 and 46

48

remove duplicates from 47

EMBASE Search Strategy

1

exp electroencephalogram/

2

exp electrocorticography/

3

electroencephalogra*.mp

4

EEG*.mp

5

Spectral array*.mp

6

(brain adj1 activit*).mp

7

brain wave*.mp

8

brainwave*.mp

9

electrocorticograph*.mp

10

ECOG*.mp

11

Alpha rhythm*.mp

12

Beta rhythm*.mp

13

Delta rhythm*.mp

14

Gamma rhythm*.mp

15

Theta rhythm*.mp

16

or/1–15

17

exp Education/

18

educat*.mp

19

teach*.mp

20

train*.mp

21

instruct*.mp

22

workshop*.mp

23

or/17–22

24

exp "seizure, epilepsy and convulsion"/

25

epilep*.mp

26

seizure*.mp

27

convulsion*.mp

28

or/24–27

29

interpret*.mp

30

exp Diagnosis/

31

diagnos*.mp

32

di.fs

33

or/29–32

34

exp adolescent/

35

exp adult/

36

adolescen*.mp

37

teen*.mp

38

youth*.mp

39

adult*.mp

40

aged.mp

41

elderly.mp

42

senior*.mp

43

or/34–42

44

16 and 23 and 28 and 33 and 43

45

remove duplicates from 44

Cochrane Search Strategy

1

electroencephalogra*.mp

2

EEG*.mp

3

Spectral array*.mp

4

(brain adj1 activit*).mp

5

brain wave*.mp

6

brainwave*.mp

7

electrocorticograph*.mp

8

ECOG*.mp

9

Alpha rhythm*.mp

10

Beta rhythm*.mp

11

Delta rhythm*.mp

12

Gamma rhythm*.mp

13

Theta rhythm*.mp

14

or/1–13

15

educat*.mp

16

teach*.mp

17

train*.mp

18

instruct*.mp

19

workshop*.mp

20

or/15–19

21

epilep*.mp

22

seizure*.mp

23

convulsion*.mp

24

or/21–23

25

interpret*.mp

26

diagnos*.mp

27

25 or 26

28

adolescen*.mp

29

teen*.mp

30

youth*.mp

31

adult*.mp

32

aged.mp

33

elderly.mp

34

senior*.mp

35

or/28–34

36

14 and 20 and 24 and 27 and 35

CINAHL Search Strategy

S1

(MH "Electroencephalography")

S2

electroencephalogra*

S3

EEG*

S4

Spectral array*

S5

(MH "Brain Waves")

S6

brain N1 activit*

S7

brain wave*

S8

brainwave*

S9

electrocorticograph*

S10

ECOG*

S11

Alpha rhythm*

S12

Beta rhythm*

S13

Delta rhythm*

S14

Gamma rhythm*

S15

Theta rhythm*

S16

S1 OR S2 OR S3 OR S4 OR S5 OR S6 OR S7 OR S8 OR S9 OR S10 OR S11 OR S12 OR S13 OR S14 OR S15

S17

(MH "Education + ")

S18

educat*

S19

teach*

S20

train*

S21

instruct*

S22

workshop*

S23

S17 OR S18 OR S19 OR S20 OR S21 OR S22

S24

S16 AND S23

S25

(MH "Electroencephalography/ED")

S26

(MH "Electroneurodiagnostic Technologists/ED")

S27

S24 OR S25 OR S26

S28

exp Epilepsy/

S29

exp Seizures/

S30

epilep*

S31

seizure*

S32

convulsion*

S33

S28 OR S29 OR S30 OR S31 OR S32

S34

interpret*

S35

(MH "Diagnosis + ")

S36

diagnos*

S37

S34 OR S35 OR S36

S38

(MH "Adult + ")

S39

(MH "Adolescence + ")

S40

adolescen*

S41

teen*

S42

youth*

S43

adult*

S44

aged

S45

elderly

S46

senior*

S47

S38 OR S39 OR S40 OR S41 OR S42 OR S43 OR S44 OR S45 OR S46

S58

S16 AND S27 AND S33 AND S37 AND S47

Web of Science Search Strategy

TOPIC: (Electroencephalogra* OR EEG* OR spectral array* OR brain activit* OR brain electric activit* OR brain wave* OR brainwave* OR electrocorticograph* OR ECOG* OR Alpha rhythm* OR Beta rhythm* OR Delta rhythm* OR Gamma rhythm* OR Theta rhythm*)

AND

TOPIC: (educat* OR teach* OR train* OR instruct* OR workshop*)

AND

TOPIC: (epilep* OR seizure* OR convulsion*)

AND

TOPIC: (interpret* OR diagnos*)

AND

TOPIC: (adolescen* OR teen* OR youth* OR adult* OR aged OR elderly OR senior*)

SCOPUS Search Strategy

(TITLE-ABS-KEY (electroencephalogra* OR eeg* OR "spectral array" OR "spectral arrays" OR "brain activity" OR "brain activities" OR "brain electric activity" OR "brain electric activities" OR "brain wave" OR "brain waves" OR brainwave OR brainwaves OR electrocorticograph*)

AND

TITLE-ABS-KEY (educat* OR teach* OR train* OR instruct* OR workshop*)

AND

TITLE-ABS-KEY (epilep* OR seizure* OR convulsion*)

AND

TITLE-ABS-KEY (interpret* OR diagnos*)

MedEdPORTAL Search Strategy

ANYWHERE: (EEG)

OR

ANYWHERE: (Seizure)

OR

ANYWHERE (Epilepsy)

Data Extracted from Studies

The following data were extracted when possible:

  • Study information

    • Author

    • Year

    • Country

  • Non-expert information

    • Number of non-experts

    • Demographics

      • Age

      • Sex

      • Healthcare profession

        • Nurse

        • Neurodiagnostic technologist

        • Medical student

        • Resident (specialty noted)

        • Fellow (specialty noted)

        • Attending physician (specialty noted)

      • Years of experience in current profession

  • EEG Curriculum information

    • Learning Theories

    • Objectives

    • Content

    • Teaching methods

    • Duration

    • Resources provided to learners

    • Learner feedback regarding curriculum

  • EEG information

    • Method of selection

    • Number

    • Duration

    • Type of EEG

      • Raw EEG defined as montaged EEG (number of channels noted)

      • Sonified EEG

      • Quantitative EEG—specific trends noted including:

        • Amplitude integrated EEG

        • Color spectral array

        • Color density spectral array

        • Density spectral array

        • Rhythmicity spectrogram

        • Asymmetry spectrogram

        • Seizure/pattern indicators

        • Other

    • Demographics of patients whose EEGs were performed/reviewed by non-experts

      • Age

      • Diagnosis

      • Location including

        • Intensive Care Unit

        • Emergency room

        • Hospital ward

        • Seizure monitoring unit

        • Outpatient setting

        • Other

    • EEG patterns (criteria used and numbers of) to be identified by non-experts

      • Electrographic seizures

      • Periodic discharges

      • Rhythmic delta activity

      • Slowing

      • Burst suppression

      • Artifacts

      • Normal patterns

      • Other

    • Details of gold standard comparison

      • EEG performance/interpreted by neurodiagnostic technologist/neurophysiologist

        • Type of EEG performed/interpreted noted including

          • Raw EEG defined as montaged EEG (number of channels noted)

          • Sonified EEG

          • Quantitative EEG—specific trends noted similar to above

  • Non-expert quantitative outcomes

    • Time required to review EEG and comparisons to gold standard

    • Time required to perform EEG and comparisons to gold standard

    • Diagnostic accuracy (for any of the above noted patterns)

      • True positives

      • True negatives

      • False positives

      • False negatives

      • Sensitivity

      • Specificity

      • Kappa values

      • Interrater agreement

      • Percent agreement

      • Pre-curriculum test results

      • Post-curriculum test results

      • Other

    • Measures of changes in patient management

Appendix 2: Summary of EEG education studies

Appendix 3: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Other Markers of Accuracy/Agreement of Non-Experts Identifying Electrographic Seizures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kromm, J., Fiest, K.M., Alkhachroum, A. et al. Structure and Outcomes of Educational Programs for Training Non-electroencephalographers in Performing and Screening Adult EEG: A Systematic Review. Neurocrit Care 35, 894–912 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01172-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01172-2

Keywords

Navigation