Abstract
Background
Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) often develop hydrocephalus requiring an external ventricular drain (EVD). The best available evidence suggests that a rapid EVD wean and intermittent CSF drainage is safe, reduces complications, and shortens ICU and hospital length of stay as compared to a gradual wean and continuous drainage. However, optimal EVD management remains controversial and the baseline practice among neurological ICUs is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine current institutional practices of EVD management for patients with aneurysmal SAH.
Methods
An e-mail survey was sent to attending intensivists and neurosurgeons from 72 neurocritical care units that are registered with the Neurocritical Care Research Network or have been previously associated with the existing literature on the management of EVDs in critically ill patients. Only one response was counted per institution.
Results
There were 45 out of 72 institutional responses (63%). The majority of responding institutions (80%) had a single predominant EVD management approach. Of these, 78% favored a gradual EVD weaning strategy. For unsecured aneurysms, 81% kept the EVD continuously open and 19% used intermittent drainage. For secured aneurysms, 94% kept the EVD continuously open and 6% used intermittent drainage. Among continuously drained patients, the EVD was leveled at 18 (unsecured) and 11 cm H2O (secured) (p < 0.0001). When accounting for whether the EVD strategy was to enhance or minimize CSF drainage, there was a significant difference in the management of unsecured versus secured aneurysms with 42% using an enhance drainage approach in unsecured patients and 92% using an enhance drainage approach in secured patients (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion
Most institutions utilize a single predominant EVD management approach, with a consensus toward a continuously open EVD to enhance CSF drainage in secured aneurysm patients coupled with a gradual weaning strategy. This finding is surprising given that the best available evidence suggests that the opposite approach is safe and can reduce ICU and hospital length of stay. We recommend a critical reassessment of the approach to the management of EVDs. Given the potential impact on patient outcomes and length of stay, more research needs to be done to reach a threshold for practice change, ideally via multicenter and randomized trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gigante P, Hwang BY, Appelboom G, Kellner CP, Kellner MA, Connolly ES. External ventricular drainage following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg. 2010;24:625–32.
Klopfenstein JD, Kim LJ, Feiz-Erfan I, et al. Comparison of rapid and gradual weaning from external ventricular drainage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective randomized trial. J Neurosurg. 2004;100:225–9.
Olson DM, Zomorodi M, Britz GW, Zomorodi AR, Amato A, Graffagnino C. Continuous cerebral spinal fluid drainage associated with complications in patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2013;119:974–80.
Fried HI, Nathan BR, Rowe AS, et al. The insertion and management of external ventricular drains: an evidence-based consensus statement: a statement for healthcare professionals from the neurocritical care society. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24:61–81.
Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2012;43:1711–37.
Olson DM, Batjer HH, Abdulkadir K, Hall CE. Measuring and monitoring ICP in neurocritical care: results from a national practice survey. Neurocrit Care. 2014;20:15–20.
Olson DM, Lewis LS, Bader MK, et al. Significant practice pattern variations associated with intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosci Nurs. 2013;45:186–93.
Allan D. Intracranial pressure monitoring: a study of nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 1989;14:127–31.
Amato A, Britz GW, James ML, et al. An observational pilot study of CSF diversion in subarachnoid haemorrhage. Nurs Crit Care. 2011;16:252–60.
Kusske JA, Turner PT, Ojemann GA, Harris AB. Ventriculostomy for the treatment of acute hydrocephalus following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1973;38:591–5.
Macdonald RL. Origins of the concept of vasospasm. Stroke; J Cereb Circ. 2016;47:e11–5.
Nornes H. The role of intracranial pressure in the arrest of hemorrhage in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm. J Neurosurg. 1973;39:226–34.
Sundbärg G, Pontén U. ICP and CSF absorption impairment after subarachnoid hemorrhage. In: Beks JWF, Bosch DA, Brock M, editors Intracranial pressure III. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1976. p. 139–46.
Voldby B, Enevoldsen EM. Intracranial pressure changes following aneurysm rupture. Part 3: recurrent hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1982;56:784–9.
O’Neill BR, Velez DA, Braxton EE, Whiting D, Oh MY. A survey of ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitor placement practices. Surg Neurol. 2008;70:268–73; discussion 73.
Rehman T, A-u Rehman, Rehman A, et al. A US-based survey on ventriculostomy practices. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:651–4.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the participating centers who shared their management strategies. Additionally, we would like to thank Stephan Mayer, Jonathan Rosand, and Leigh Hochberg for helpful comments, Mabel Chung for critical review of the manuscript, and Eric Rosenthal and Abby Cohen for assistance with IRB preparation. Dr. Chung is supported through NINDS R25 NS065743.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, D.Y., Leslie-Mazwi, T.M., Patel, A.B. et al. Management of External Ventricular Drains After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Multi-Institutional Survey. Neurocrit Care 26, 356–361 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-016-0352-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-016-0352-9