Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Clinical Significance of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter-Related Deep Vein Thrombosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are being increasingly utilized in hospitalized patients as alternatives to centrally inserted central venous catheters (CICVCs). However, concern exists over the risk of PICC-related large vein thrombosis (PRLVT). The incidence rate and significance of symptomatic PRLVT in critically ill patients admitted to the neurological intensive care unit (ICU) is not known.

Methods

Retrospective descriptive study of consecutive PICCs placed in critically ill patients admitted to a tertiary care neurological ICU between March 2008 and February 2010. Symptomatic PRVLT was defined as an event that prompted Duplex ultrasound of the ipsilateral extremity in which an acute, proximal large vein thrombosis was confirmed in association with the PICC or confirmed within 5 days of PICC removal. Incidence rate of PRLVT and catheter-related complications were calculated per “line” (catheter). Descriptive statistics were performed with two-sample, and t-tests for age and categorical variables were assessed by Chi-square test or Fishers exact test as appropriate

Results

Four hundred and seventy-nine lines were placed during the study period with 39 developing a symptomatic PRLVT (incidence rate = 8.1%). Male gender was associated with development of a thrombosis (P = 0.02), but size (P = 0.21) and location of catheter were not (P = 0.30). Median line dwell time was 12 days (IQR 16) with a dwell time of 8 days (IQR 9) until thrombosis diagnosis. Pulmonary embolus attributed to PRLVT occurred in 1.3% of line placements and 15% of symptomatic PRLVT. The majority of patients had their line removed. In addition, some patients also had anticoagulation initiated or a superior vena cava filter placed.

Conclusions

Symptomatic PRLVT is not uncommon in critically ill patients admitted to the neurological ICU. Future research should focus on indentifying modifiable risk factors for PRLVT and on comparing major cumulative complication rates between PICCs and CICVCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horattas MC, Trupiano J, Hopkins S, Pasini D, Martino C, Murty A. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings. Am J Infect Control. 2001;29:32–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Walshe LJ, Malak SF, Eagan J, Sepkowitz KA. Complication rates among cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3276–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdullah BJ, Mohammad N, Sangkar JV, Abd Aziz YF, Gan GG, Goh KY, Benedict I. Incidence of upper limb venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). Br J Radiol. 2005;78:596–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lobo BL, Vaidean G, Broyles J, Reaves AB, Shorr RI. Risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:417–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonizzoli M, Batacchi S, Cianchi G, Zagli G, Lapi F, Tucci V, Martini G, Di Valvasone S, Peris A. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters and central venous catheters related thrombosis in post-critical patients. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:284–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans RS, Sharp JH, Linford LH, Lloyd JF, Tripp JS, Jones JP, Woller SC, Stevens SM, Elliott CG, Weaver LK. Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters. Chest. 2010;138:803–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trerotola SO, Stavropoulos SW, Mondschein JI, Patel AA, Fishman N, Fuchs B, Kolansky DM, Kasner S, Pryor J, Chittams J. Triple-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter in patients in the critical care unit: prospective evaluation. Radiology. 2010;256:312–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM, Martin JB, Misset B, Renaud B, Carlet J. Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients: incidence, risks factors, and relationship with catheter-related sepsis. Chest. 1998;114:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Periard D, Monney P, Waeber G, Zurkinden C, Mazzolai L, Hayoz D, Doenz F, Zanetti G, Wasserfallen JB, Denys A. Randomized controlled trial of peripherally inserted central catheters vs. peripheral catheters for middle duration in-hospital intravenous therapy. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:1281–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paauw JD, Borders H, Ingalls N, Boomstra S, Lambke S, Fedeson B, Goldsmith A, Davis AT. The incidence of PICC line-associated thrombosis with and without the use of prophylactic anticoagulants. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008;32:443–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. King MM, Rasnake MS, Rodriguez RG, Riley NJ, Stamm JA. Peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated thrombosis: retrospective analysis of clinical risk factors in adult patients. South Med J. 2006;99:1073–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ong B, Gibbs H, Catchpole I, Hetherington R, Harper J. Peripherally inserted central catheters and upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. Australas Radiol. 2006;50:451–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chemaly RF, de Parres JB, Rehm SJ, et al. Venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a retrospective analysis of the Cleveland Clinic experience. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1179–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moser KM, Fedullo PF, LitteJohn JK, Crawford R. Frequent asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis. JAMA. 1994;271:223–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prandoni P, Polistena P, Bernardi E, et al. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Risk factors, diagnosis, and complications. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:57–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkpatrick A, Rathbun S, Whitsett T, Raskob G. Prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2007;120:901.e1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Verso M, Agnelli G. Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3665–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Owens CA, Bui JT, Knuttinen MG, Gaba RC, Carrillo TC. Pulmonary embolism from upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and the role of superior vena cava filters: a review of the literature. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:779–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kearon C, Kahn Sr, Agnelli G, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133:454S–545S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kusminsky RE. Complications of central venous catheterization. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:681–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Safdar N, Maki DG. Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients. Chest. 2005;128:489–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest or financial disclosures. No intra or extramural funding sources were used for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, 3552 Taubman Health Care Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5338, USA

    Jeffrey J. Fletcher, William Stetler & Thomas J. Wilson

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Center, 3552 Taubman Health Care Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5338, USA

    Jeffrey J. Fletcher

Authors
  1. Jeffrey J. Fletcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Stetler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas J. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey J. Fletcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher, J.J., Stetler, W. & Wilson, T.J. The Clinical Significance of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter-Related Deep Vein Thrombosis. Neurocrit Care 15, 454–460 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9554-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9554-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation