Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conivaptan for Hyponatremia in the Neurocritical Care Unit

  • original article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Conivaptan is the first arginine vasopressin antagonist to be FDA-approved for the treatment of euvolemic hyponatremia, a common complication in neurointensive care patients. Due to risks for cerebral edema and seizures, sodium levels are generally aggressively maintained within normal levels (135–145 meq/l) in this patient population.

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of conivaptan for the treatment of euvolemic hyponatremia in the neurocritical care unit.

Methods

Data were obtained retrospectively on 22 patients treated with conivaptan for euvolemic hyponatremia. End points evaluated included time to [Na] increase of ≥6 meq/l; incidences of rapid overcorrection of [Na] (defined as an increase of >12 meq/l in a 24-h period while on conivaptan), infusion site reactions, or other adverse events; and whether sodium levels decreased after discontinuation of conivaptan.

Results

A [Na] increase of ≥6 meq/l was reached in 19/22 (86%) patients, with an average time to goal of 13.1 h. No patients experienced a rapid overcorrection of [Na]. Five patients had an infusion site reaction necessitating an IV change. One patient experienced hypotension and another complained of thirst during infusion. Conivaptan was initiated in 11/22 patients (50%) who were hyponatremic despite already being on conventional therapies.

Conclusion

Conivaptan was safe and effective in this small series of neurointensive care patients, including many patients who were hyponatremic despite traditional treatments to maintain normal sodium levels. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of conivaptan as an adjunctive and/or alternative therapy for hyponatremia in this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Androgué HJ, Madias NE. Hyponatremia. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1581–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM200005253422107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sterns RH, Silver SM. Brain volume regulation in response to hypo-osmolality and its correction. Am J Med. 2006;119:S12–6. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhardwaj A, Ulatowski JA. Hypertonic solutions and brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004;10:126–31. doi:10.1097/00075198-200404000-00009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diringer MN, Zazulia AR. Hyponatremia in neurologic patients: consequences and approaches to treatment. Neurologist. 2006;12(3):117–26. doi:10.1097/01.nrl.0000215741.01699.77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nathan BR. Cerebral correlates of hyponatremia. Neurocrit Care. 2007;6:72–8. doi:10.1385/NCC:6:1:72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeltser D, Rosansky S, van Rensburg H, Verbalis JG, Smith N, for the Conivaptan Study Group. Assessment of the efficacy of intravenous conivaptan in euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Am J Nephrol. 2007;27:447–57. doi:10.1159/000106456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaprisol package insert. Deerfield: Astellas Pharma, U.S. Inc.; 2007

  8. Verbalis JG. AVP receptor antagonists as aquaretics: review and assessment of clinical data. Cleve Clin J Med. 2006;73(Suppl 3):S24–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer BF. Hyponatremia in patients with central nervous system disease: SIADH versus CSW. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14(4):182–7. doi:10.1016/S1043-2760(03)00048-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gross P, Reimann D, Henschkowski J, Damian M. Treatment of severe hyponatremia: conventional and novel aspects. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:S10–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Verbalis JG. Vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists. J Mol Endocrinol. 2002;29:1–9. doi:10.1677/jme.0.0290001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhardwaj A. Neurological impact of vasopressin dysregulation and hyponatremia. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:229–36. doi:10.1002/ana.20788.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasan D, Vermeulen M, Wijdicks EF, Hijdra A, van Gijn J. Effect of fluid intake and antihypertensive treatment on cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1989;20(11):1511–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy T, Dhar R, Axelrod A, Corry J, Russel E, Diringer M. Conivaptan for the correction of hyponatremia in the neurocritical care unit. Neurocrit Care. 2008;8:196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy L. Wright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, W.L., Asbury, W.H., Gilmore, J.L. et al. Conivaptan for Hyponatremia in the Neurocritical Care Unit. Neurocrit Care 11, 6–13 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-008-9152-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-008-9152-1

Keywords

Navigation