Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Commission’s proposal amending social security coordination regulations: how to combine Union citizens’ rights and social security institutions’ needs?

  • Article
  • Published:
ERA Forum Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems and regulation (EC) No 987/2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, COM/2016/0815 final.

  2. Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC [2004] OJ L 158/77.

  3. Council Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community [1992] OJ L 136/1.

  4. Case C-140/12 Brey, EU:C:2013:565; Case C-333/13 Dano, EU:C:2014:2358; Case C-67/14 Alimanovic, EU:C:2015:597; Case C-299/14 Garcia Nieto, EU:C:2016:114.

  5. Lhernould/Eichenhofer/Rennuy/Van Overmeiren/Wollenschläger [3].

  6. Case C-316/13 Fenoll, EU:C:2015:200.

  7. See Article 7(3) of Directive 2004/38.

  8. Fuchs/Garcia De Cortazar/Kahil/Pöltl [1], p. 51.

  9. As it is explained in the independent report current Article 61 may tempt people to benefit from the one day rule in a fraudulent way. A typical example could be when a person induces or connives with an employer to establish an employment relation which in reality is disguised employment.

  10. Garcia De Cortazar/Rentola/Fuchs/Klosse [2].

  11. Case C-292/89 Antonissen, EU:C:1991:80.

  12. See Art. 11(3)(c).

  13. Case C-131/95 Huijbrechts [1997] ECR I-1409.

  14. Garcia De Cortazar/Rentola/Fuchs/Klosse [2].

References

  1. Fuchs, M. (ed.), Garcia De Cortazar, C., Kahil, B., Pöltl, M.: Assessment of the impact of amendments to the EU social security coordination rules on aggregation of periods or salaries for unemployment benefits. FreSsco, European Commission, May (2015)

  2. Garcia De Cortazar, C. (ed.), Rentola, E. (ed.), Fuchs, M., Klosse, S.: Coordination of Unemployment Benefits. European Commission (2012)

  3. Lhernould, J.-P. (ed.), Eichenhofer, E., Rennuy, N., Van Overmeiren, F., Wollenschläger, F.: Assessment of the impact of amendments to the EU social security coordination rules to clarify its relationship with Directive 2004/38/EC as regards economically inactive persons, June (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=1098

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France

    Jean-Philippe Lhernould

Authors
  1. Jean-Philippe Lhernould
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Philippe Lhernould.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lhernould, JP. The Commission’s proposal amending social security coordination regulations: how to combine Union citizens’ rights and social security institutions’ needs?. ERA Forum 18, 155–164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-017-0463-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-017-0463-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation