Skip to main content
Log in

A pilot study to determine the optimal timing of the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

  • AUTOIMMUNITY
  • Published:
Immunologic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Physician Global Assessment (PGA) is an important and useful outcome measurement of lupus disease activity, but consensus on whether the PGA should be performed prior to or after the receipt of laboratory values is lacking. The objective of this study was to collect preliminary data on the optimal time to perform a PGA. In this pilot study, a PGA was performed by a single clinician upon completion of an outpatient clinical encounter and again after receipt of pertinent laboratory values. Laboratory values obtained at each clinical visit included a CBC, comprehensive chemistries, C3, C4, anti-dsDNA antibody levels, urinalysis and, if pertinent, a spot urinary protein/creatinine ratio. Disease activity was additionally determined by the SELENA-SLEDAI. Fifty-four patients, 3 males and 51 females with an average SLE disease duration of 12.3 (SD 10.5) years contributed 74 assessments to this study. The average SELENA-SLEDAI was 2.2. The average pre-laboratory PGA was 0.46, and the average post-laboratory PGA was 0.55 (p < 0.02 paired Student’s t test). Among the 48 encounters with active disease and a mean SELENA-SLEDAI of 3.37, concordance of the pre-laboratory and post-laboratory PGAs occurred in only third of the patient encounters. Both pre- and post-PGA correlated with the SELENA-SLEDAI. However, the correlation of the post-PGA with the SELENA-SLEDAI was significantly greater than the correlation of the pre-PGA and SELENA-SLEDAI [r = 0.69 vs 0.79, respectively (p < 0.0179)]. In some lupus patients, the PGA determined prior to receipt of laboratory values may be the same as the PGA determined after laboratory values are received. However, in these preliminary data, there was a significant difference between pre-laboratory and post-laboratory PGA with a significantly greater correlation of the post-laboratory PGA with the SELENA-SLEDAI. Further studies in a larger patient population with a greater range of disease activity are needed to confirm and extend these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH. Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The committee on prognosis studies in SLE. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:630–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang MH, Socher SA, Larson MG, Schur PH. Reliability and validity of six systems for the clinical assessment of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1989;32:1107–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hay EM, Bacon PA, Gordon C, Isenberg DA, Maddison P, Snaith ML, Symmns DP, Viner N, Zoma A. The BILAG index: a reliable and valid instrument for measuring clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. QJM. 1993;86:447–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vitali C, Bencivelli W, Isenberg DA, Smoler JS, Snaith ML, Scinto M, et al. Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: report of the Consensus Study Group of the European Workshop for Rheumatology Research II. Identification of the variables indicative of disease activity and their use in the developer of an activity score. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1992;10:541–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gladman DD, Ibanez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:288–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Petri M, Kim MY, Kalunian KC, Grossman J, Hahn BH, Sammaritano LR, et al. Combined oral contraceptives in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(24):2550–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bae SC, Koh HK, Chang DK, Kim MH, Park JK, Kim SY. Reliability and of systemic lupus activity measure-revised (SLAM-R) for measuring clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2001;10:405–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Isenberg DA, Rahman A, Allen E, Farewell V, Akil M, Bruce IN, et al. BILAG 2004: development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group’s disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44:902–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Petri M, Hellmann D, Hochberg M. Validity and reliability of lupus activity measures in the routine clinic setting. J Rheumatol. 1992;19(1):53–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quimby KR, Flower C, Hambleton IR, Landis RC, Hennis AJ. Comparison of the systemic lupus erythematosus activity questionnaire and the systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index in a black barbadian population. Int J Rheumatol. 2013;2013:875369. doi:10.1155/2013/875369.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia Aranow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aranow, C. A pilot study to determine the optimal timing of the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Res 63, 167–169 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-015-8712-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-015-8712-7

Keywords

Navigation