Abstract
Multiplexed fluorescence or electrochemiluminescence immunoassays of soluble cytokines are commonly performed in the context of human serum or plasma, to look for disease biomarkers and to monitor the immune system in a simple and minimally invasive way. These assays provide challenges due to the complexities of the matrix (serum or plasma) and the presence of many cytokines near the limit of detection of the assay. Here, we compare the readout of matched serum and plasma samples, which are generally correlated. However, a subset of cytokines usually have higher levels in serum, and the non-specific background is significantly increased in serum versus plasma. Presumably as a result of this non-specific background, disease-related decreases in low-abundance cytokines can sometimes be detected in plasma but not in serum. We further show, through spike recovery experiments, that both serum and plasma inhibit the readout of many cytokines, with some variability between donors, but with serum causing greater inhibition than plasma in many cases. Standard diluents from different vendors can partially reverse this inhibition to varying degrees. Dilution of samples can also partly overcome the inhibitory effect of the matrix. We also show that dilution is nonlinear and differentially affects various cytokines. Together, these data argue that (1) plasma is a more sensitive matrix for detecting changes in certain low-abundance cytokines; (2) calculation of concentrations in serum or plasma matrices is inherently inaccurate; and (3) dilution of samples should not be assumed to be linear, i.e., all comparisons need to be made among similarly diluted samples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Djoba Siawaya JF, Roberts T, Babb C, Black G, Golakai HJ, Stanley K, Bapela NB, Hoal E, Parida S, van Helden P, Walzl G. An evaluation of commercial fluorescent bead-based Luminex cytokine assays. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2535.
duPont NC, Wang K, Wadhwa PD, Culhane JF, Nelson EL. Validation and comparison of luminex multiplex cytokine analysis kits with ELISA: determinations of a panel of nine cytokines in clinical sample culture supernatants. J Reprod Immunol. 2005;66:175–91.
Pang S, Smith J, Onley D, Reeve J, Walker M, Foy C. A comparability study of the emerging protein array platforms with established ELISA procedures. J Immunol Methods. 2005;302:1–12.
Breen EC, Reynolds SM, Cox C, Jacobson LP, Magpantay L, Mulder CB, Dibben O, Margolick JB, Bream JH, Sambrano E, Martinez-Maza O, Sinclair E, Borrow P, Landay AL, Rinaldo CR, Norris PJ. Multisite comparison of high-sensitivity multiplex cytokine assays. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18:1229–42.
Maecker HT. Measuring human cytokines. In: O’Gorman MR, Donnenberg AD, editors. Handbook of human immunology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2008. p. 517–40.
Martins TB, Pasi BM, Litwin CM, Hill HR. Heterophile antibody interference in a multiplexed fluorescent microsphere immunoassay for quantitation of cytokines in human serum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:325–9.
de Jager W, Bourcier K, Rijkers GT, Prakken BJ, Seyfert-Margolis V. Prerequisites for cytokine measurements in clinical trials with multiplex immunoassays. BMC Immunol. 2009;10:52.
Phillips DJ, League SC, Weinstein P, Craig Hooper W. Interference in microsphere flow cytometric multiplexed immunoassays for human cytokine estimation. Cytokine. 2006;36:180–8.
Tate J, Ward G. Interferences in immunoassay. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25:105–20.
Miller JJ. Interference in Immunoassays: Avoiding erroneous results. Clin Lab Int. 2004;28:14–17.
Chaturvedi AK, Kemp TJ, Pfeiffer RM, Biancotto A, Williams M, Munuo S, Purdue MP, Hsing AW, Pinto L, McCoy JP, Hildesheim A. Evaluation of multiplexed cytokine and inflammation marker measurements: a methodologic study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20:1902–11.
Wong HL, Pfeiffer RM, Fears TR, Vermeulen R, Ji S, Rabkin CS. Reproducibility and correlations of multiplex cytokine levels in asymptomatic persons. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:3450–6.
Dossus L, Becker S, Achaintre D, Kaaks R, Rinaldi S. Validity of multiplex-based assays for cytokine measurements in serum and plasma from “non-diseased” subjects: Comparison with ELISA. J Immunol Methods. 2009;350:125–32.
Jacobson JW, Oliver KG, Weiss C, Kettman J. Analysis of individual data from bead-based assays (“bead arrays”). Cytometry. 2006;69A:384–90.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Grants 5U19AI057229 and 5U19AI090019 from the NIAID, NIH. Leo Hansmann is supported by a research fellowship from the German Research Foundation (DFG). We thank Cindy Huynh for technical services.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosenberg-Hasson, Y., Hansmann, L., Liedtke, M. et al. Effects of serum and plasma matrices on multiplex immunoassays. Immunol Res 58, 224–233 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-014-8491-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-014-8491-6