Skip to main content
Log in

The utilization of incinerated hip and knee prostheses for identification

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to test various methods of retrieving number data from hip and knee implants from cremated human remains and to validate our findings by cross referencing our results with the national joint replacement registry.

Method

Implants were collected from the remains of individuals who had donated their bodies to science following routine planned cremation. A number of different chemical and physical methods to expose the implant numbers on cremated implants to the point that they were legible were tested. The retrieved data on the implants was referred to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry to identify the individuals, and the names were cross-referenced from the original list of donors.

Results

It was possible to retrieve sufficient data from cremated implants to track the name of the recipient of implants if they were placed following the formation of the registry. Both wet and dry paper (1200 size and without moisture), and fine grade steel wool (used in antique restoration), were successful in removing the oxidized layer from implants. With hip implants, it was discovered that the best area to retrieve clear readable information is inside the ball head or at the end of the neck as this area is protected from oxidation during incineration.

Conclusion

Incinerated or cremated hip and knee implants may be used to assist in the identification of a decedent following careful treatment, in conjunction with national joint revision registries and company data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Thompson T, Black S. Forensic human identification. An Introduction. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett JL, Benedix DC. Positive identification of cremains recovered from an automobile based on presence of an internal fixation device. J Forensic Sci. 1999;44(6):1296–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Issacs TW, Margolius KA, Chester GH. Postmortem identification by means of a recovered intraocular lens. Am J Forensic Med. 1997;18(4):404–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson EK, James RA, Eitzen DA, Byard RW. Role of orthopedic implants and bone morphology in the identification of human remains. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(2):442–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson RJ, Bethard JD, DiGangi EA. The use of orthopedic surgical devices for forensic identification. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(2):460–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Registry AOANJR. 2014. https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/procedures-reported. Accessed 29 April 2014.

  7. Grupp TM, Weik T, Bloemer W, Knaebel H. Modular titanium alloy neck adapter failures in hip replacement—failure mode analysis and influence of implant material. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ubelaker DH, Jacobs CH. Identification of orthopedic device manufacturer. J Forensic Sci. 1995;40(2):168–70.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Registry AOANJR. Other registries Worldwide. 2014. https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/registries.

  10. Branovacki G. Hip arthroplasty USA femoral implants 1938–2008. 1st ed. Chicago: Ortho Atlas Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Durão HC, Pinto R, Ribeiro C, Vieira D. Importance of a national arthroplasty register for identification by medical examiner. Rev Bras Ortop. 2012;47(5):651–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Takeshita H, Nagai T, Sagi M, Chiba S, Kanno S, Takada M, et al. Forensic identification using multiple lot numbers of an implanted device. Med Sci Law. 2014;54(1):51–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the following people for their assistance with this study: Helen James; Forensic Odontology Unit, Neil Langlois; Forensic Science South Australia, Lindsay Richards; University of Adelaide, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Ray Last Anatomy Laboratory, Adelaide Cemeteries Authority, Centennial Park, Richard Duddy; Legal Risk University of Adelaide, Stryker Corporation, Smith and Nephew Corporation, Zimmer Corporation, and DePuy Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John William Berketa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berketa, J.W., Simpson, E., Graves, S. et al. The utilization of incinerated hip and knee prostheses for identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 11, 432–437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9677-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9677-5

Keywords

Navigation