Skip to main content
Log in

Immunohistochemical diagnosis of myocarditis on (infantile) autopsy material: Does it improve the diagnosis?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The standard for the histopathologic diagnosis of myocarditis has been the Dallas criteria. Recently, immunohistochemical studies that include the specification and quantification of interstitial inflammatory cells have been proposed as the diagnostic approach for myocarditis. Cut-off limits regarding inflammatory cell numbers for the positive diagnosis of myocarditis have been recommended. However, it is unclear whether these can be applied to postmortem tissues or to infants, as they were established from endomyocardial biopsies and for adults. Nevertheless, cut-off limits for the postmortem diagnosis of myocarditis in the first year of life have been proposed. Studies using these cut-off limits identified myocarditis in a high percentage of presumed sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases. These results were re-evaluated by the present study, which examined heart specimens from infants less than 1 year of age. The study had a test group of 92 SIDS cases and a control group of 15. Myocardial tissue was examined from eight standardized locations, stained with hematoxylin-eosin and for three different immunohistochemical reagents (LCA for leukocytes, CD68 for macrophages, CD45-RO for T-lymphocytes). Histopathological assessment of the number of inflammatory cells was carried out on an aggregate of 80 mm2 of myocardial tissue per case. Myocarditis, based on the Dallas criteria, was histologically diagnosed in only two cases. Immunohistochemical quantification revealed elevated cell counts in the SIDS group for LCA and CD45-RO. However, those differences were neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant as the mean cell counts per mm2 were low. The density of inflammatory cells differed considerably from section to section and even within single sections. Therefore the commonly used arithmetic mean value was not diagnostically relevant, suggesting cut-off values based on the arithmetic mean value as recommended in the literature, cannot be regarded as valid. At least in infants, the diagnosis of myocarditis from autopsy tissues still requires application of the Dallas criteria. Immunohistochemical methods cannot replace the conventional diagnosis of myocarditis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angelini A, Calzolari V, Calabrese F, Boffa GM, Maddalena F, Chioin R, Thiene G. Myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction: role of endomyocardial biopsy in the differential diagnosis. Heart. 2000;84:245–50.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chimenti C, Pieroni M, Maseri A, Frustaci A. Histologic findings in patients with clinical and instrumental diagnosis of sporadic arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. JACC. 2004;43:2305–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper LT. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1526–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein RM, Vester EG, Brehm MU, Dees H, Picard F, Niederacher D, et al. Entzündung des Myokards als Arrhythmietrigger. Z Kardiol. 2000;89:III24–35.

  5. Kühl U, Pauschinger M, Bock T, Klingel K, Schwimmbeck PL, Seeberg B, et al. Parvovirus B19 infection mimicking acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003;108:945–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Deluigi CC, Kispert E, Hager S, Meinhardt G, et al. Presentation, patterns of myocardial damage, and clinical course of viral myocarditis. Circulation. 2006;114:1581–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pankuweit S, Maisch B. Das Herz bei viralen Infektionen. Internist. 2010;51:836–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Casali MB, Lazzaro A, Gentile G, Blandino A, Ronchi E, Zoja R. Forensic grading of myocarditis: an experimental contribution to the distinction between lethal myocarditis and incidental myocarditis. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;223:78–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beckwith JB. The sudden infant death syndrome. Curr Probl Pediatr. 1973;3:1–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeSa DJ. Isolated myocarditis in the first year. Arch Dis Child. 1985;60:484–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dettmeyer R, Schlamann M, Madea B. Immunohistochemical techniques improve the diagnosis of myocarditis in cases of suspected sudden infant death syndrome. Forensic Sci Int. 1999;105:83–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dettmeyer R. Plötzlicher Kindstod. Neue Aspekte zur Bedeutung der virusbedingen Herzmuskelentzündung. Aachen: Shaker; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dettmeyer R, Baasner A, Haag C, Bruch S, Schlamann M. Immunohistochemical and molecular-pathological diagnosis of myocarditis in cases of suspected sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)—a multicenter study. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009;11:124–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krous HF, Ferandos C, Masoumi H, Arnold J, Haas EA, Stanley C, Grossfeld PD. Myocardial inflammation, cellular death, and viral detection in sudden infant death caused by SIDS, suffocation or myocarditis. Pediatr Res. 2009;66:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rambaud C, Cieuta C, Canioni D, Rouzioux C, Lavaud J, Hubert P, et al. Cot death and myocarditis. Cardiol Young. 1992;2:266–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rasten-Almquist P, Eksborg S, Rajs J. Myocarditis and sudden infant death syndrome. APMIS. 2002;110:469–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shatz A, Hiss J, Arensburg B. Myocarditis misdiagnosed as sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Med Sci Law. 1997;37:16–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weber MA, Ashworth MT, Risdon RA, Malone M, Burch M, Sebire NJ. Clinicopathological features of paediatric deaths due to myocarditis: an autopsy series. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93:594–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Byard RW. Sudden death in the young. 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Hort W. Pathologie des Endokard, der Kranzarterien und des Myokard. Berlin: Springer; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aretz HT, Billingham ME, Edwards WD, Factor SM, Fallon JT, Fenoglio JJ Jr, et al. Myocarditis. A histopathological definition and classification. Am J Cardiovasc Pathol. 1987;1:3–14.

  22. Aretz HT. Myocarditis: the Dallas criteria. Hum Pathol. 1987;18:619–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Billingham ME. The diagnostic criteria of myocarditis by endomycardial biopsy. Heart Vessels Suppl. 1985;1:133–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baughman KL. Diagnosis of myocarditis: death of Dallas criteria. Circulation. 2006;113:593–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hauck AJ, Kearney DL, Edwards WD. Evaluation of postmortem endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 38 patients with lymphocytic myocarditis: implications for role of sampling error. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989;64:1235–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chow LH, Radio SJ, Sears TD, McManus BM. Insensitivity of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of myocarditis. JACC. 1989;14:915–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shanes JG, Ghali J, Billingham ME, Ferrans VJ, Fenoglio JJ, Edwards WD, et al. Interobserver variability in the pathologic interpretation of endomyocardial biopsy results. Circulation. 1987;75:401–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dennert R, Crijns HJ, Heymans S. Acute viral myocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2073–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Forcada P, Beigelman R, Milei J. Inapparent myocarditis and sudden death in pediatrics. Diagnosis by immunohistochemical staining. Int J Cardiol. 1996;56:93–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Klingel K, Sauter M, Bock CT, Szalay G, Schnorr JJ, Kandolf R. Molecular pathology of inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2004;193:101–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kühl U, Pauschinger M, Schultheiss HP. Neue Konzepte zur Diagnostik der entzündlichen Herzmuskelentzündung. Dtsch Med Wschr. 1997;122:690–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Circulation. 2006;113:876–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maisch B, Portig I, Ristic A, Hufnagel G, Pankuweit S. Definition of inflammatory cardiomyopathy (myocarditis): on the way to consensus. A status report. Herz. 2000;25:200–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Strauer BE, Kandolf R, Mall G, Maisch B, Mertens T, Figulla HR, et al. Update 2001. Myokarditis-Kardiomyopathie. Med Klin. 2001;96:608–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dettmeyer R, Baasner A, Schlamann M, Padosch SA, Haag C, Kandolf R, Madea B. Role of virus-induced myocardial affections in sudden infant death syndrome: a prospective postmortem study. Pediatr Res. 2004;55:947–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Madea B. Sudden death, especially in infancy–improvement of diagnosis by biochemistry, immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology. Legal Med. 2009;11:36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Edwards WD, Holmes DR Jr, Reeder GS. Diagnosis of active lymphocytic myocarditis by endomyocardial biopsy: quantitative criteria for light microscopy. Mayo Clin Proc. 1982;57:419–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Foley DA, Edwards WD. Quantitation of leukocytes in endomyocardial tissue from 100 normal human hearts at autopsy. Implications for diagnosis of myocarditis from biopsy specimens of living patients. Am J Cardiovasc Pathol. 1988;2:145–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rognum TO, Arnestad M, Bajanowski T, Banner J, Blair P, Borthne A, et al. State of the art conference on the stratification of SUDI. Consensus on diagnostic criteria for the exclusion of SIDS. Nordisk Rettsmedisin. 2003;3/4:49–88.

  40. Krous HF, Beckwith JB, Byard RW, Rognum TO, Bajanowski T, Corey T, et al. Sudden infant death syndrome and unclassified sudden infant deaths: a definitional and diagnostic approach. Pediatrics. 2004;114:234–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Baandrup U, Olsen EGJ. Critical analysis of endomyocardial biopsies from patients suspected of having cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J. 1981;45:475–86.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cunningham KS, Veinot JP, Butany J. An approach to endomyocardial biopsy interpretation. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59:121–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Konno S, Sakakibara S. Endo-Myocardial Biopsy. Dis Chest. 1963;44:345–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U, et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:3076–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kitulwatte ID, Kim PJ, Pollanen MS. Sudden death related myocarditis: a study of 56 cases. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010;6:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nielsen TS, Nyengaard JR, Møller J, Banner J, Nielsen LP, Baandrup UT. Quantitative diagnosis of lymphocytic myocarditis in forensic medicine. For Sci Int. 2014;238:9–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burkhard Madea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grasmeyer, S., Madea, B. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of myocarditis on (infantile) autopsy material: Does it improve the diagnosis?. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 11, 168–176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9675-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9675-7

Keywords

Navigation