Abstract
This study describes the occurrence of suspected wildlife crimes submitted for forensic examination in Scotland in 2010. The study aims were to determine which types of crimes were committed, which species were targeted, and the outcome of investigations, in order to assess the contribution of forensic examinations in the prosecution of wildlife crimes. Information on suspected wildlife crimes submitted between January 1 and December 31, 2010 to the SAC Consulting: Veterinary Services Disease Surveillance Centers, Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture, and to the University of Glasgow, was used. The location of suspected crimes, the species targeted, cause of death, and types of the 188 submitted wildlife crimes were summarized. More information regarding cases involving birds were submitted than cases involving mammals, and included 114 raptors, 14 waterfowl, and 22 “other bird species.” Mammal cases (n = 38) included 12 badgers, 8 foxes, 7 deer, 4 hares, and 7 “other mammals.” The cause of death was determined in 124 suspected crimes; malicious or accidental trauma was the most likely cause of death in 72, and 33 were poisoned. Forensic evidence supporting criminal activity was found in 53 cases, and poisoning was the most frequent crime recorded. At least five individuals were successfully prosecuted, representing 2.7 % of submissions. It was challenging to track cases from submission through to prosecution and laboratories conducting forensic investigations were often not informed of the outcome of prosecutions or court decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilson-Wilde L. Wildlife crime: a global problem. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010;6:221–2.
National Wildlife Crime Unit (NWCU). Strategic assessment February 2011. 2011. http://www.defra.gov.uk/paw/tools/. Accessed 28 Jan 2012.
Smart J, Amar A, Sim IMW, Etheridge B, Cameron D, Christie G, et al. Illegal killing slows population recovery of a re-introduced raptor of high conservation concern—the red kite Milvus milvus. Biol Conserv. 2010;143(5):1278–86.
Whitfield DP, Fielding AH, McLeod DRA, Haworth PF. Modelling the effects of persecution on the population dynamics of golden eagles in Scotland. Biol Conserv. 2004;119(3):319–33.
Etheridge B, Summers RW, Green RE. The effects of illegal killing and destruction of nests by humans on the population dynamics of the Hen Harrier Circus cyaneus in Scotland. J Appl Ecol. 1997;34(4):1081–105.
Donnelly RR. Natural justice: a joint thematic inspection of the arrangements in Scotland for preventing, investigating and prosecuting wildlife crime. 2008. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/218661/0058716.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2012.
Munro R, Munro HMS. Animal abuse and illegal killing. Forensic veterinary pathology. London: Saunders; 2008.
Wobeser G. Forensic (medico-legal) necropsy of wildlife. JWD. 1996;32(2):240–9.
Eaton MA, Brown AF, Noble DG, Musgrove AJ, Hearn RD, Aebischer NJ, et al. Birds of conservation concern 3. Br Birds. 2009;102:296–341.
Philibert H, Wobeser G, Clark R. Counting dead birds: examination of methods. JWD. 1993;29(2):284–9.
Munro R, Munro HMC. Some challenges in forensic veterinary pathology: a review. J Comp Pathol. 2013;149(1):57–73.
Halverson J, Baston CA. A PCR multiple and database for forensic DNA identification of dogs. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:11–22.
The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). The illegal killing of birds in Scotland in 2009. 2009. http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/illegalkillingscotland_tcm9-256571.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2012.
McDonald RA, Harris S, Turnbull G, Brown P, Fletcher M. Anticoagulant rodenticides in stoats (Mustela erminea) and weasels (Mustela nivalis) in England. Environ Pollut. 1998;103(1):17–23.
Newton I, Wyllie I, Freestone P. Rodenticides in British Barn Owls. Environ Pollut. 1990;68(1–2):101–17.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Elizabeth Sharpe, SASA for providing toxicology data. Sarah Stoner from the National Wildlife Crime Unit for assisting with many queries to do with the project. Thanks also to Bob Elliot, RSPB, and Chief Superintendant Mike Flynn, SSPCA, who assisted with follow up on cases submitted by their respective agencies. Thank you to Ted Leighton for comments on the manuscript. Project funding was provided by the Partnership for Wildlife Crime Scotland (PAWS) and Caroline Millins was supported by a PhD studentship from the Biotechnology and Biological Science Laboratory Council (BBSRC). SAC Consulting: Veterinary Services receives financial support from the Scottish Government for farm animal disease surveillance activities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Millins, C., Howie, F., Everitt, C. et al. Analysis of suspected wildlife crimes submitted for forensic examinations in Scotland. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10, 357–362 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9568-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9568-1