Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Different conditions and strategies to utilize forensic radiology in the cities of Melbourne, Australia and Berlin, Germany

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forensic radiology has become a common modality in many forensic practices around the world. Here, we report and compare the usage patterns in the cities of Melbourne, Australia, and Berlin, Germany, using 16 multislice scanners in two large forensic facilities with both machines integrated in the mortuary. While in Melbourne all bodies receive a full body computed tomography (CT) scan resulting in nearly 5,000 scans per year, the situation differs in Berlin where approximately 250 state prosecutor sanctioned cases are scanned per year. While in Melbourne the CT scanner is an integral element of the process of determining whether further examinations will follow, in contrast in Berlin all cases proceed to autopsy irrespective of the findings from the CT scan. While pathologists in Berlin receive on site training to use the CT scanner by a highly experienced forensic pathologist who has previously been involved in the Virtopsy® program in Switzerland, training of pathologists in Melbourne is multifaceted. A radiologist with extensive experience in the forensic environment is employed part time at the institute in Melbourne and provides radiology lectures including topics such as postmortem artifacts, regional anatomy, and neuroradiology. CT is gaining acceptance as a useful modality for presenting information to the courts and juries, as well as providing an easily accessible platform to review cases and initiated research projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thali MJ, Viner MD, Brogdon BG. Brogdon’s forensic radiology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wüllenweber R, Schneider V, Grumme T. Computertomographische Untersuchungen bei Schädel-Schuß-Verletzungen. Z Rechtsmed. 1977;80:227–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris LS. Postmortem magnetic resonance images of the injured brain: effective evidence in the courtroom. Forensic Sci Int. 1991;50:179–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Donchin Y, Rivkind AI, Bar-Ziv J, Hiss J, Almog J, Drescher M. Utility of postmortem computed tomography in trauma victims. J Trauma. 1994;37:552–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Ross S, Buck U, Naether S, Vock P. Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:273–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grabherr S, Djonov V, Yen K, Thali MJ, Dirnhofer R. Postmortem angiography: review of former and current methods. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:832–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackowski C, Persson A, Thali MJ. Whole body postmortem angiography with a high viscosity contrast agent solution using poly ethylene glycol as contrast agent dissolver. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:465–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sidler M, Jackowski C, Dirnhofer R, Vock P, Thali M. Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification - advantages and limitations. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;169:118–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedford PJ, Routine CT. scan combined with preliminary examination as a new method in determining the need for autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:390–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bedford PJ. Should pathologists be reporting CT scans? Acad Forensic Pathol. 2012;2:198–201.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ampanozi G, Zimmermann D, Hatch GM, Ruder TD, Ross S, Flach PM, Thali MJ, Ebert LC. Format preferences of district attorneys for postmortem medical imaging reports: understandability, cost effectiveness, and suitability for the courtroom: a questionnaire based study. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2012;14:116–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guddat SS, Gapert R, Tsokos M, Oesterhelweg L. Proof of live birth using postmortem multislice computed tomography (pmMSCT) in cases of suspected neonaticide: advantages of diagnostic imaging compared to conventional autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013;9:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bassed RB, Briggs C, Drummer OH. Age estimation using CT imaging of the third molar tooth, the medial clavicular epiphysis, and the spheno-occipital synchondrosis: a multifactorial approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;212:273 e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burke M, Parsons S, Bassed R. Management of medicolegal natural deaths from hemopericardium or hemothorax using postmortem CT scanning. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:367–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Olsen O, Gunny RS, Offiah A, Saunders DE, Owens CM, Chong WK, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS Protocol). BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bolliger MJ, Buck U, Thali MJ, Bolliger SA. Reconstruction and 3D visualisation based on objective real 3D based documentation. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012;8:208–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmiere C, Binaghi S, Doenz F, Bize P, Chevallier C, Mangin P, Grabherr S. Detection of hemorrhage source: the diagnostic value of postmortem CT-angiography. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;222:33–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cordner SM, Woodford N, Bassed R. Forensic aspects of the 2009 Victorian Bushfires Disaster. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:2–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stray-Pedersen A, Rogde S, Ormstad K, Hoff-Olsen P, Vege A, Delaveris GJM, et al. Forensic medical examination after the July 22nd 2011 terror attack. Scand J Forensic Sci. 2012;18:55–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jeffery A, Raj V, Morgan B, West K, Rutty GN. The criminal justice system’s considerations of so-called near-virtual autopsies: the East Midlands experience. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64:711–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul J. Bedford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bedford, P.J., Oesterhelweg, L. Different conditions and strategies to utilize forensic radiology in the cities of Melbourne, Australia and Berlin, Germany. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 9, 321–326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-013-9424-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-013-9424-8

Keywords

Navigation