Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

10-year follow-up study comparing primary medical vs. surgical therapy in women with prolactinomas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While dopamine-agonists are the first-line approach in treating prolactinomas, surgery can be considered in selected cases besides non-responders or patients with dopamine-agonist intolerance. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term outcome in women with prolactinomas treated primarily either surgically or medically who had not had prior dopamine-agonist treatment. Retrospective case-note study of all consecutive women with prolactinomas primarily managed with medical therapy or surgery in a tertiary referral centre. The clinical, biochemical, and radiological responses to first-line treatment at early and long-term follow-up were analysed. The primary therapeutic strategy was dopamine-agonists for 36 (34 %) and surgery for 71 (66 %) of the women. Baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics were not significantly different between the primary surgical and medical cohort. Median follow-up time was 90 months (range 13–408). Following primary treatment, prolactin level significantly decreased in both cohorts, on average to 13.5 µg/L (IQR 7–21; p < 0.001), and was within the normal range in 82 % of all patients. No women in the surgical cohort demonstrated permanent sequelae and morbidity was low. At final follow-up, control of hyperprolactinaemia required dopamine-agonist therapy in 64 % of women who had undergone primary medical therapy vs. 32 % of those who had primary surgical therapy (p = 0.003). Logistic regression revealed that the primary therapeutic strategy, but not adenoma size, was an independent risk factor for long-term dependence on dopamine-agonists. The present data indicate that in a dedicated tertiary referral centre, long-term control of hyperprolactinaemia in women with prolactinomas is high. In selected cases, a primary neurosurgical approach might at least be interdisciplinarily discussed with the primary goal of minimizing long-term dependence on dopamine-agonists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.C. Oh, M.K. Aghi, Dopamine agonist-resistant prolactinomas. J. Neurosurg. 114, 1369–1379 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ono, N. Miki, T. Kawamata et al., Prospective study of high-dose cabergoline treatment of prolactinomas in 150 patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93, 4721–4727 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A.I. Green, M. Sherlock, P.M. Stewart, N.J. Gittoes, A.A. Toogood, Extensive experience in the management of macroprolactinomas. Clin. Endocrinol. 81, 85–92 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Babey, R. Sahli, I. Vajtai, R.H. Andres, R.W. Seiler, Pituitary surgery for small prolactinomas as an alternative to treatment with dopamine agonists. Pituitary 14, 222–230 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Kreutzer, R. Buslei, H. Wallaschofski et al., Operative treatment of prolactinomas: indications and results in a current consecutive series of 212 patients. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 158, 11–18 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Loyo-Varela, T. Herrada-Pineda, F. Revilla-Pacheco, S. Manrique-Guzman, Pituitary tumor surgery: review of 3004 cases. World Neurosurg. 79, 331–336 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Primeau, C. Raftopoulos, D. Maiter, Outcomes of transsphenoidal surgery in prolactinomas: improvement of hormonal control in dopamine agonist-resistant patients. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 166, 779–786 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. X. Qu, M. Wang, G. Wang et al., Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of transsphenoidal surgery for prolactinoma in men: a single-center experience with 87 consecutive cases. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 164, 499–504 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. T.R. Smith, M.M. Hulou, K.T. Huang et al., Current indications for the surgical treatment of prolactinomas. J. Clin. Neurosci. 22, 1785–1791 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Andereggen, G. Schroth, J. Gralla et al., Selective inferior petrosal sinus sampling without venous outflow diversion in the detection of a pituitary adenoma in Cushing’s syndrome. Neuroradiology 54, 495–503 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. J.P. Cottier, C. Destrieux, L. Brunereau et al., Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenoma: MR imaging. Radiology 215, 463–469 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Z.B. Wu, Z.P. Su, J.S. Wu, W.M. Zheng, Q.C. Zhuge, M. Zhong, Five years follow-up of invasive prolactinomas with special reference to the control of cavernous sinus invasion. Pituitary 11, 63–70 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R.W. Seiler, L. Mariani, Sellar reconstruction with resorbable vicryl patches, gelatin foam, and fibrin glue in transsphenoidal surgery: a 10-year experience with 376 patients. J. Neurosurg. 93, 762–765 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J.A. Wass, When to discontinue treatment of prolactinoma? Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2, 298–299 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Colao, A. Di Sarno, P. Cappabianca, C. Di Somma, R. Pivonello, G. Lombardi, Withdrawal of long-term cabergoline therapy for tumoral and nontumoral hyperprolactinemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 2023–2033 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Losa, P. Mortini, R. Barzaghi, L. Gioia, M. Giovanelli, Surgical treatment of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: early results and long-term outcome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87, 3180–3186 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Raverot, A. Wierinckx, E. Dantony et al., Prognostic factors in prolactin pituitary tumors: clinical, histological, and molecular data from a series of 94 patients with a long postoperative follow-up. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, 1708–1716 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bloomgarden E., Molitch M.E. Surgical treatment of prolactinomas: cons. Endocrine 47, 730–733 (2014)

  19. M.E. Molitch, Management of medically refractory prolactinoma. J. Neuro-oncol. 117, 421–428 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M.E. Molitch, R.L. Elton, R.E. Blackwell et al., Bromocriptine as primary therapy for prolactin-secreting macroadenomas: results of a prospective multicenter study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 60, 698–705 (1985)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Webster, G. Piscitelli, A. Polli, C.I. Ferrari, I. Ismail, M.F. Scanlon, A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. Cabergoline Comparative Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 331, 904–909 (1994)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. I. Bancos, M.R. Nannenga, J.M. Bostwick, M.H. Silber, D. Erickson, T.B. Nippoldt, Impulse control disorders in patients with dopamine agonist-treated prolactinomas and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a case-control study. Clin. Endocrinol. 80, 863–868 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W.M. Drake, C.E. Stiles, T.A. Howlett, A.A. Toogood, J.S. Bevan, R.P. Steeds, A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of cardiac valvular abnormalities in hyperprolactinemic patients treated with ergot-derived dopamine agonists. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 99, 90–96 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Galluzzi, R. Salti, S. Stagi, F. La Cauza, F. Chiarelli, Reversible weight gain and prolactin levels--long-term follow-up in childhood. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 18, 921–924 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. B.L. Roth, Drugs and valvular heart disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 6–9 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Verhelst, R. Abs, D. Maiter et al., Cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a study in 455 patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 2518–2522 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Kharlip, R. Salvatori, G. Yenokyan, G.S. Wand, Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after withdrawal of long-term cabergoline therapy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 2428–2436 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. O. Cohen-Inbar, Z. Xu, D. Schlesinger, M.L. Vance, J.P. Sheehan, Gamma knife radiosurgery for medically and surgically refractory prolactinomas: long-term results. Pituitary 18, 820–830 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Menucci, A. Quinones-Hinojosa, P. Burger, R. Salvatori, Effect of dopaminergic drug treatment on surgical findings in prolactinomas. Pituitary 14, 68–74 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Caputo, D. Prior, W.J. Inder, The need for annual echocardiography to detect cabergoline-associated valvulopathy in patients with prolactinoma: a systematic review and additional clinical data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 3, 906–913 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Elenkova, R. Shabani, K. Kalinov, S. Zacharieva, Increased prevalence of subclinical cardiac valve fibrosis in patients with prolactinomas on long-term bromocriptine and cabergoline treatment. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 167, 17–25 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. V. Delgado, N.R. Biermasz, S.W. van Thiel et al., Changes in heart valve structure and function in patients treated with dopamine agonists for prolactinomas, a 2-year follow-up study. Clin. Endocrinol. 77, 99–105 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Schade, F. Andersohn, S. Suissa, W. Haverkamp, E. Garbe, Dopamine agonists and the risk of cardiac-valve regurgitation. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 29–38 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. P. Anagnostis, F. Adamidou, S.A. Polyzos, Z. Efstathiadou, E. Karathanassi, M. Kita, Long term follow-up of patients with prolactinomas and outcome of dopamine agonist withdrawal: a single center experience. Pituitary 15, 25–29 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. C. Schmid, D.L. Goede, R.S. Hauser, M. Brandle, Increased prevalence of high Body Mass Index in patients presenting with pituitary tumours: severe obesity in patients with macroprolactinoma. Swiss Med. Wkly. 136, 254–258 (2006)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. C.M. dos Santos Silva, F.R. Barbosa, G.A. Lima et al., BMI and metabolic profile in patients with prolactinoma before and after treatment with dopamine agonists. Obesity 19, 800–805 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Yermus, S. Ezzat, Does normalization of prolactin levels result in weight loss in patients with prolactin secreting pituitary adenomas? Clin. Endocrinol. 56, 562 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Y. Greenman, K. Tordjman, N. Stern, Increased body weight associated with prolactin secreting pituitary adenomas: weight loss with normalization of prolactin levels. Clin. Endocrinol. 48, 547–553 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Ciresi, M.C. Amato, V. Guarnotta, F. Lo Castro, C. Giordano, Higher doses of cabergoline further improve metabolic parameters in patients with prolactinoma regardless of the degree of reduction in prolactin levels. Clin. Endocrinol. 79, 845–852 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation (PBBEB-146099, and -155299 to L.A.). We wish to thank Dr. Edward R. Laws, Jr., MD, FACS, Director, Pituitary and Neuroendocrine Centre, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, for his insightful suggestions. The assistance of Ms. Susan Kaplan in editing the manuscript is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuel Christ.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

This work or part of this work has not been previously published and/or is not under consideration for publication anywhere else. The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Ethical standards and patient consent

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Bern (Kantonale Ethikkommision, KEK, Bern, Switzerland), the Swiss Ethics Committee on research involving humans. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Additional information

Lukas Andereggen and Janine Frey contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andereggen, L., Frey, J., Andres, R.H. et al. 10-year follow-up study comparing primary medical vs. surgical therapy in women with prolactinomas. Endocrine 55, 223–230 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-1115-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-1115-2

Keywords

Navigation