Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intensification of insulin therapy with basal-bolus or premixed insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of intensified insulin regimens (basal-bolus versus premixed) on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. We conducted an electronic search until March 2015 on many electronic databases including online registries of ongoing trials. All RCTs comparing basal-bolus with premixed insulin regimens, with a duration of >12 weeks and with >30 patients per arm, were included. Investigators extracted data on study characteristics, outcome measures, and methodological quality. We found thirteen RCTs lasting 16–60 weeks and involving 5255 patients assessed for the primary endpoint (reduction of HbA1c from baseline). Meta-analysis of change in HbA1c level between basal-bolus and premixed insulin regimens resulted in a small and non-significant difference of 0.09 % (95 % CI −0.03 to 0.21), with substantial heterogeneity between studies (I 2 = 74.4 %). There was no statistically significant difference in the event rate for overall hypoglycemia (0.16 episode/patient/year, 95 %CI −2.07 to 2.3), weight change (−0.21 kg, −0.164 to 0.185), and daily insulin dose (−0.54 U/day, −2.7 to 1.6). The likelihood for reaching the HbA1c <7 % was 8 % higher (3–13 %, I 2 = 68.8 %) with the basal-bolus as compared with the premixed regimen. There is no clinically relevant difference in the efficacy of basal-bolus versus premixed insulin regimens for HbA1c decrease in type 2 diabetic patients. These findings may be helpful to adapt treatment to individual patient needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.W. Gregg, X. Zhuo, Y.J. Cheng, A.L. AlbrighL, K.M. Narayan, T.J. Thompson, Trends in lifetime risk and years of life lost due to diabetes in the USA, 1985–2011: a modelling study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2, 867–874 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Diabetes Association, 7. Approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes Care 38(Suppl. 1), S41–S48 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L.W. Turner, D. Nartey, R.S. Stafford, S. Singh, G.C. Alexander, Ambulatory treatment of type 2 diabetes in the U.S., 1997–2012. Diabetes Care 37, 985–992 (2014)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Esposito, P. Chiodini, G. Bellastella, M.I. Maiorino, D. Giugliano, Proportion of patients at HbA1c target <7 % with eight classes of antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetes: systematic review of 218 randomized controlled trials with 78,945 patients. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 14, 228–233 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. P. de Pablos-Velasco, K.G. Parhofer, C. Bradley, E. Eschwège, L. Gönder-Frederick, P. Maheux, I. Wood, D. Simon, Current level of glycaemic control and its associated factors in patients with type 2 diabetes across Europe: data from the PANORAMA study. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 80, 47–56 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), S.E. Inzucchi, R.M. Bergenstal, J.B. Buse, E. Diamant, M. Ferrannini, A.L. Nauck, A. Peters, R. Tsapas, R. Wender, D.R. Matthews, Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 35, 1364–1379 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Orals Plus Apidra and LANTUS (OPAL) study group, M.R. Lankisch, K.C. Ferlinz, J.L. Leahy, W.A. Scherbaum, Introducing a simplified approach to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of two single dose regimens of insulin glulisine plus insulin glargine and oral antidiabetic drugs. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 10, 1178–1185 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.B. Davidson, P. Raskin, R.J. Tanenberg, A. Vlajnic, P. Hollander, A stepwise approach to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and basal insulin treatment failure. Endocr. Pract. 17, 395–403 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A.J. Garber, J. Wahlen, T. Wahl, P. Bressler, R. Braceras, E. Allen, R. Jain, Attainment of glycaemic goals in type 2 diabetes with once-, twice-, or thrice-daily dosing with biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (The 1-2-3 study). Diabetes Obes. Metab. 8, 58–66 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O. Mosenzon, I. Raz, Intensification of insulin therapy for type 2 diabetic patients in primary care: basal-bolus regimen versus premix insulin analogs: when and for whom? Diabetes Care 36(Suppl 2), S212–S218 (2013)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. B.T. Blak, H.T. Smith, M. Hards, A. Maguire, V. Gimeno, A retrospective database study of insulin initiation in patients with Type 2 diabetes in UK primary care. Diabet. Med. 29, e191–e198 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. P.D. Home, M.-P. Dain, N. Freemantle, R. Kawamori, M. Pfohl, S. Brette, V. Pilorget, W.A. Scherbaum, G. Vespasiani, M. Vincent, B. Balkau, Four-year evolution of insulin regimens, glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and body weight after starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes across three continents. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2015.01.030

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.L. Li, W. Jia, J. Weng, Glycemic control in insulinized type 2 diabetes patients in China: one-year results from IDMPS. American Diabetes Association 69th Scientific Sessions, New Orleans, 2009

  14. A. Liberati, D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P.C. Gøtzsche, J.P. Ioannidis, M. Clarke, P.J. Devereaux, J. Kleijnen, D. Moher, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 151, W65–W94 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Higgins, D.G. Altman, P.C. Gotzsche, P. Jüni, D. Moher, A.D. Oxman, J. Savovic, K.F. Schulz, L. Weeks, J.A. Sterne, The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ 343, d5928 (2011)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A.R. Jadad, R.A. Moore, D. Carroll, C. Jenkinson, D.J. Reynolds, D.J. Gavaghan, H.J. McQuay, Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control. Clin. Trials 17, 1–12 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J.P.T. Higgins, S. Green (ed.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (The Cochrane Collaboration, 5.1.0. Oxford, 2011)

  18. J.J.A.D. Deeks, M.J. Bradburn, Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis, in Systematic Reviews in Health Care, ed. by M.D.-S.G. Egger, D.G. Altman (BMJ Publishing, London, 2001), pp. 285–312

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Malek, F. Ajili, S.H. Assaad-Khalil, A. Shinde, J.W. Chen, E. Van den Berg, Similar glucose control with basal-bolus regimen of insulin detemir plus insulin aspart and thrice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a 50-week randomized clinical trial of stepwise insulin intensification. Diabetes Metab. (2014). doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2014.11.002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Jia, X. Xiao, Q. Ji, K.-J. Ahn, L.-M. Chuang, Y. Bao, C. Pang, L. Chen, F. Gao, Y. Tu, P. Li, J. Yang, Comparison of thrice-daily premixed insulin (insulin lispro premix) with basal-bolus (insulin glargine once-daily plus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro) therapy in east Asian patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with twice-daily premixed insulin: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 3, 254–262 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Giugliano, M. Tracz, S. Shah, A. Calle-Pascual, C. Mistodie, R. Duarte, R. Sari, V. Woo, A.O. Jiletcovici, J. Deinhard, S.A. Wille, J. Kiljanski, Initiation and gradual intensification of premixed insulin lispro therapy versus basal ± mealtime insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes eating light breakfasts. Diabetes Care 37, 372–380 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. F.J. Tinahones, J.L. Gross, A. Onaca, S. Cleall, A. Rodríguez, Insulin lispro low mixture twice daily versus basal insulin glargine once daily and prandial insulin lispro once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin intensification: a randomized phase IV trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 16, 963–970 (2014)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. M.C. Riddle, J. Rosenstock, A. Vlajnic, L. Gao, Randomized, 1-year comparison of three ways to initiate and advance insulin for type 2 diabetes: twice-daily premixed insulin versus basal insulin with either basal-plus one prandial insulin or basal-bolus up to three prandial injections. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 16, 396–402 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Bowering, V.A. Reed, J.S. Felicio, J. Landry, L. Ji, J. Oliveira, A study comparing insulin lispro mix 25 with glargine plus lispro therapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control on oral anti-hyperglycaemic medication: results of the PARADIGM study. Diabet. Med. 29, e263–e272 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. P.A. Levin, Q. Zhang, J.H. Mersey, F.Y. Lee, L.A: Bromberger, M. Bhushan, R. Bhushan, Glycemic control with insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine versus premixed insulin analogues in real-world practices: a cost-effectiveness study with a randomized pragmatic trial design. Clin. Ther. 33, 841–850 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Fritsche, M. Larbig, D. Owens, H.U. Häring, GINGER study group, Comparison between a basal-bolus and a premixed insulin regimen in individuals with type 2 diabetes-results of the GINGER study. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 12, 115–123 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. W.F. Miser, R. Arakaki, H. Jiang, J. Scism-Bacon, P.W. Anderson, J.L. Fahrbach, Randomized, open-label, parallel-group evaluations of basal-bolus therapy versus insulin lispro premixed therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing to achieve control with starter insulin treatment and continuing oral antihyperglycemic drugs: a noninferiority intensification substudy of the DURABLE trial. Clin. Ther. 32, 896–908 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. S.M. Jain, X. Mao, M. Escalante-Pulido, N. Vorokhobina, I. Lopez, L.L. Ilag, Prandial-basal insulin regimens plus oral antihyperglycaemic agents to improve mealtime glycaemia: initiate and progressively advance insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 12, 967–975 (2010)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. PREFER Study Group, A. Liebl, R. Prager, K. Binz, M. Kaiser, R. Bergenstal, B. Gallwitz, Comparison of insulin analogue regimens in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the PREFER Study: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 11, 45–52 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Rosenstock, A.J. Ahmann, G. Colon, J. Scism-Bacon, H. Jiang, S. Martin, Advancing insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes previously treated with glargine plus oral agents: prandial premixed (insulin lispro protamine suspension/lispro) versus basal-bolus (glargine/lispro) therapy. Diabetes Care 31, 20–25 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. R.J. Ligthelm, U. Mouritzen, H. Lynggaard, M. Landin-Olsson, C. Fox, C. le Devehat, E. Romero, A. Liebl, Biphasic insulin aspart given thrice daily is as efficacious as a basal-bolus insulin regimen with four daily injections: a randomised open-label parallel group four months comparison in patients with type 2 diabetes. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 114, 511–519 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. European Medicines Agency, Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment or prevention of diabetes mellitus. CPMP/EWP/1080/00 Rev. 1. 14 May 2012. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2012/06/WC500129256.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2015

  33. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for industry diabetes mellitus: developing drugs and therapeutic biologics for treatment and prevention. draft guidance (2008). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm071627.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2015

  34. D. Giugliano, M.I. Maiorino, G. Bellastella, P. Chiodini, A. Ceriello, K. Esposito, Efficacy of insulin analogs in achieving the hemoglobin A1c target of <7 % in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 34, 510–517 (2011)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Miao, W. Wei, O. Baser, L. Xie, Real world outcomes of adding rapid-acting insulin versus switching to analog premix insulin among US patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine. Patient Prefer Adherence 7, 951–960 (2013)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 4-T Study Group, R.R. Holman, K.I. Thorne, A.J. Farmer, M.J. Davies, J.F. Keenan, S. Paul, J.C. Levy, Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes. New Engl. J. Med. 357, 1716–1730 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 4-T Study Group, R.R. Holman, A.J. Farmer, M.J. Davies, J.C. Levy, J.L. Darbyshire, J.F. Keenan, S.K. Paul, Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. New Engl. J. Med. 361, 1736–1747 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D. Giugliano, M.I. Maiorino, G. Bellastella, P. Chiodini, K. Esposito, Treatment regimens with insulin analogues and haemoglobin A1c target of <7 % in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 92, 1–10 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. D. Giugliano, M.I. Maiorino, G. Bellastella, M. Petrizzo, A. Ceriello, S. Genovese, K. Esposito, Setting the hemoglobin A1c target in type 2 diabetes: a priori, a posteriori, or neither? Endocrine (2015). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005892

    Google Scholar 

  40. G. Dieuzeide, L.M. Chuang, A. Almaghamsi, A. Zilov, J.W. Chen, F.J. Lavalle-González, Safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in people with type 2 diabetes switching from basal-bolus insulin regimens in the A1chieve study. Prim Care Diabetes 8, 111–117 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. C. Mathieu, F. Storms, J. Tits, T.F. Veneman, I.M. Colin, Switching from premixed insulin to basal-bolus insulin glargine plus rapid-acting insulin: the ATLANTIC study. Acta Clin. Belg. 68, 28–33 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. H.I. Price, M.D. Agnew, J.-M. Gamble, Comparative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients taking different insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. BMJ Open 5, e006341 (2015)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Giugliano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

D. G. received consultancy fee from Eli Lilly and have held lectures for Eli Lilly, Sanofi Aventis; K. E. received consultancy fee from Eli Lilly and have held lectures for Eli Lilly, Sanofi Aventis, and Novo Nordisk.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2419 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giugliano, D., Chiodini, P., Maiorino, M.I. et al. Intensification of insulin therapy with basal-bolus or premixed insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endocrine 51, 417–428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0718-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0718-3

Keywords

Navigation