Abstract
Pro-domain of a cysteine cathepsin contains a highly conserved Ex2Rx2Fx2Nx3Ix3N (ERFNIN) motif. The zymogen structure of cathepsins revealed that the Arg(R) residue of the motif is a central residue of a salt-bridge/H-bond network, stabilizing the scaffold of the pro-domain. Importance of the arginine is also demonstrated in studies where a single mutation (Arg → Trp) in human lysosomal cathepsin K (hCTSK) is linked to a bone-related genetic disorder “Pycnodysostosis”. In the present study, we have characterized in vitro Arg → Trp mutant of hCTSK and the same mutant of hCTSL. The R → W mutant of hCTSK revealed that this mutation leads to an unstable zymogen that is spontaneously activated and auto-proteolytically degraded rapidly. In contrast, the same mutant of hCTSL is sufficiently stable and has proteolytic activity almost like its wild-type counterpart; however it shows an altered zymogen activation condition in terms of pH, temperature and time. Far and near UV circular dichroism and intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence experiments have revealed that the mutation has minimal effect on structure of the protease hCTSL. Molecular modeling studies shows that the mutated Trp31 in hCTSL forms an aromatic cluster with Tyr23 and Trp30 leading to a local stabilization of pro-domain and supplements the loss of salt-bridge interaction mediated by Arg31 in wild-type. In hCTSK-R31W mutant, due to presence of a non-aromatic Ser30 residue such interaction is not possible and may be responsible for local instability. These differences may cause detrimental effects of R31W mutation on the regulation of hCTSK auto-activation process compared to altered activation process in hCTSL.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- hCTSL:
-
Human cathepsin L
- hCTSK:
-
Human cathepsin K
- SDS:
-
Sodium dodecylsulfate
- PEG:
-
Polyethylene glycol
- MW:
-
Molecular weight
- CD:
-
Circular dichroism
- WT:
-
Wild type
- RT:
-
Room temperature
- IPTG:
-
Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside
References
Rawlings, N. D., Barrett, A. J., & Bateman, A. (2012). MEROPS: The database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Research, 40, D343–D350.
Otto, H. H., & Schirmeister, T. (1997). Cysteine proteases and their inhibitors. Chemical Reviews, 97, 133–172.
Rossi, A., Deveraux, Q., Turk, B., & Sali, A. (2004). Comprehensive search for cysteine cathepsins in the human genome. Biological Chemistry, 385, 363–372.
Lecaille, F., Brömme, D., & Lalmanach, G. (2008). Biochemical properties and regulation of cathepsin K activity. Biochimie, 90, 208–226.
McGrath, M. E. (1999). The lysosomal cysteine proteases. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, 28, 181–204.
Honey, K., & Rudensky, A. Y. (2003). Lysosomal cysteine proteases regulate antigen presentation. Nature Reviews Immunology, 6, 472–482.
Brömme, D., & Wilson, S. (2011). Role of cysteine cathepsins in extracellular proteolysis. Extracellular Matrix Degradation, 2, 23–51.
Marko, F., & Turk, B. (2014). Cysteine cathepsins and extracellular matrix degradation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1840, 2560–2570.
Turk, D., & Guncar, G. (2003). Lysosomal cysteine proteases (cathepsins): Promising drug targets. Acta Crystallographica Section D, 59, 203–213.
Saftig, P., & Klumperman, J. (2009). Lysosome biogenesis and lysosomal membrane proteins: Trafficking meets function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 10, 623–635.
Dutta, S., Choudhury, D., Roy, S., Dattagupta, J. K., & Biswas, S. (2016). Mutation in the pro-peptide region of a cysteine protease leads to altered activity and specificity—a structural and biochemical approach. Plosad- One, 11, e0158024.
Wiederanders, B., Kaulmann, G., & Schilling, K. (2003). Functions of propeptide parts in cysteine proteases. Current Protein & Peptide Science, 4, 309–326.
Dardenne, L. E., Werneck, A. S., de Oliveira Neto, M., & Bisch, P. M. (2003). Electrostatic properties in the catalytic site of papain: A possible regulatory mechanism for the reactivity of the ion pair. Proteins, 52, 236–253.
Roy, S., Choudhury, D., Aich, P., Dattagupta, J. K., & Biswas, S. (2012). The structure of a thermostable mutant of pro-papain reveals its activation mechanism. Acta Crystallographica Section D, 68, 1591–1603.
Cygler, M., & Mort, J. S. (1997). Proregion structure of members of the papain superfamily. Mode of inhibition of enzymatic activity. Biochimie, 79, 645–652.
Coulombe, R., Grochulski, P., Sivaraman, J., Ménard, R., Mort, J. S., & Cygler, M. (1996). Structure of human procathepsin L reveals the molecular basis of inhibition by the prosegment. The EMBO Journal, 15, 5492–5503.
Groves, M. R., Coulombe, R., Jenkins, J., & Cygler, M. (1998). Structural basis for specificity of papain-like cysteine protease proregions toward their cognate enzymes. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, 32, 504–514.
Verma, S., Dixit, R., & Pandey, K. C. (2016). Cysteine proteases: modes of activation and future prospects as pharmacological targets. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 7, 107.
Khan, A. R., & James, M. N. G. (1998). Molecular mechanisms for the conversion of zymogens to active proteolytic enzymes. Protein Science, 7, 815–836.
Schroder, B. A., Wrocklage, C., Hasilik, A., & Saftig, P. (2010). The proteome of lysosomes. Proteomics, 10, 4053–4076.
Roy, S., Choudhury, D., Chakrabarti, C., Biswas, S., & Dattagupta, J. K. (2011). Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction studies of the precursor protein of a thermostable variant of papain. Acta Crystallographica Section F, 67, 634–636.
Vernet, T., Berti, P. J., de Montigny, C., Musil, R., Tessier, D. C., Ménard, R., Magny, M. C., Storer, A. C., & Thomas, D. Y. (1995). Processing of the papain precursor. The ionization state of a conserved amino acid motif within the Pro region participates in the regulation of intramolecular processing. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270, 10838–10846.
Choudhury, D., Roy, S., Chakrabarti, C., Biswas, S., & Dattagupta, J. K. (2009). Production and recovery of recombinant propapain with high yield. Phytochemistry, 70, 465–472.
Gelb, B. D., Shi, G. P., Chapman, H. A., & Desnick, R. J. (1996). Pycnodysostosis, a lysosomal disease due to cathepsin K deficiency. Science, 273, 1137–1139.
Roy, S., Dattagupta, J. K., & Biswas, S. (2012). Expression of recombinant human cathepsin K is enhanced by codon optimization. Process Biochemistry, 47, 1944–1947.
Nick Pace, C., Grimsley, G. R., & Martin Scholtz, J. (2009). Protein ionizable groups: pK values and their contribution to protein stability and solubility. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284, 13285–13289.
Choudhury, D., Biswas, S., Roy, S., & Dattagupta, J. K. (2010). Improving thermostability of papain through structure-based protein engineering. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, 23, 457–467.
Dutta, S., Choudhury, D., Dattagupta, J. K., & Biswas, S. (2011). C-terminal extension of a plant cysteine protease modulates proteolytic activity through a partial inhibitory mechanism. The FEBS Journal, 278, 3012–3024.
Barrett, A. J., Kembhavi, A. A., Brown, M. A., Kirschke, H., Knight, C. G., Tamai, M., & Hanada, K. (1982). L-trans-Epoxysuccinyl-leucylamido(4-guanidino)butane (E-64) and its analogues as inhibitors of cysteine proteinases including cathepsins B, H and L. The Biochemical Journal, 201, 189–198.
Whitmore, L., & Wallace, B. A. (2004). DICHROWEB, an online server for protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopic data. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 668–673.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by institutional grant (MSACR project) and funding from DBT, Govt. of India (BT/PR13895/BRB/10/789/2010 dt. 15-06-2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aich, P., Biswas, S. Highly Conserved Arg Residue of ERFNIN Motif of Pro-Domain is Important for pH-Induced Zymogen Activation Process in Cysteine Cathepsins K and L. Cell Biochem Biophys 76, 219–229 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-017-0838-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-017-0838-x