Abstract
We evaluated the clinical significance of the combined use of mammography + ultrasound as a new breast screening strategy. The inclusion criteria were: (1) females aged >40yrs; (2) breast cancer diagnosis by the breast image screening personnel at FUSCC; (3) screening by both ultrasound and mammography; (4) mammographic/sonographic images analyzed independently by different radiologists; and (5) follow-up for at least 1 year. Fifty-four women were enrolled. The analysis included diagnostic sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, and mammography + ultrasound. The sensitivities of mammography and mammography + ultrasound were compared overall as well as among different age groups/breast densities. The screening sensitivity of mammography, ultrasound, and mammography + ultrasound was 79.6, 57.4, and 92.6 %, respectively. The difference between mammography and mammography + ultrasound was significant (P < 0.05). The benefit of including ultrasound with mammography as a new breast image screening strategy was found statistically significant in patients with dense breast on mammogram while it was non-significant in younger (<50 years) women. We, therefore, concluded that mammography + ultrasound increased the diagnostic sensitivity of breast screening; hence it was more desirable for women with dense breast on mammography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernard, W., & Stewart, P. K. (2003). International agency for research on cancer, World Health Organization, World Cancer Report IARC. Lyons: WHO.
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., et al. (2008). Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin, 58, 71–96.
Parkin, D. M., Ferlay, S. W. J., Teppo, L., & Thomas, D. B. (2002). Cancer incidence in five continents, volume VIII. IARC Science Publications, 1–781.
Porter, P. (2008). “Westernizing” women’s risks? Breast cancer in lower-income countries. N Engl J Med, 358, 213–216.
Stavros, A., Thickman, D., Rapp, C., Dennis, M., Parker, S., & Sisney, G. (1995). Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology, 196, 123–127.
Skaane, P., & Engedal, K. (1998). Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenomas and invasive ductal carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol, 170, 109–114.
Rahbar, G., Sie, A., Hansen, G., et al. (1999). Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology, 213, 889–894.
Qing, X., Guangyu, L., Yajia, G., et al. (2008). Imaging screening of breast cancer: primary results of 5,307 cases. Chin J Radiol, 42, 1266–1268.
Kolb, T. M., Lichy, J., Newhouse, J. H., et al. (2002). Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology, 225, 165–175.
American College of Radiology (ACR). (2003). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), (4th ed.) Am Coll Radiol, Virginia, pp 1–259.
The report of Shanghai Center of Disease Control [R]. 2007. The report of 2006 Shanghai malignant tumors, Shanghai, pp 25–29.
Berg, W. A., Arnoldus, C. L., Teferra, E., et al. (2001). Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology, 221, 495–503.
Berg, W. A., Blume, J. D., Cormack, J. B., et al. (2008). Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc, 299, 2151–2163.
Lili, T., Ni, L., Ying, X., et al. (2006). The application of ultrasonography in breast cancer screening of Chinese women with dense breast. Chin J Gen Surg, 15, 732–735.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the participants for their interest in the project and cooperation. This study was supported by grants from the Million Women Screening Project, Zhimin Shao, FUSCC; China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ya-jie, J., Wei-jun, P., Cai, C. et al. Application of Breast Ultrasound in a Mammography-Based Chinese Breast Screening Study. Cell Biochem Biophys 65, 37–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-012-9400-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-012-9400-z