Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Different Selenium Sources on Growth Performance, Tissue Selenium Content, Meat Quality, and Selenoprotein Gene Expression in Finishing Pigs

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Se-methylselenocysteine (MeSeCys) is a natural organic selenium (Se) supplement. However, its effects on animal nutrition are poorly understood. This study compared the effects of sodium selenite (SeNa), MeSeCys, and selenomethionine (SeMet) on immune function, tissue Se concentration, meat quality, and selenoprotein gene expression in pigs. A total of 72 finishing pigs were divided into four groups, which received a basal diet (BD, 0.1 mg Se/kg) without Se supplementation or one supplemented with SeNa, MeSeCys, or SeMet at a concentration of 0.25 mg Se/kg. Organic Se supplementation significantly increased the immune globulin A (IgA), IgG, and IgM serum levels compared with BD and SeNa groups (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in growth performance among the four groups. SeMet was more efficient in increasing Se concentrations in the heart, muscle, and liver than MeSeCys and SeNa (P < 0.05), while no statistically significant differences were observed between MeSeCys and SeNa. Se supplementation significantly decreased the pressing muscle loss compared with the BD group (P < 0.05). Meat color and pH were not significantly affected. Se supplement effects on liver selenoprotein gene mRNA level enhancement were ranked as follows: MeSeCys > SeMet > SeNa (P < 0.05). In muscle tissues, only the SELENOW mRNA level was significantly increased by the MeSeCys and SeMet treatment, compared with the SeNa group. In conclusion, SeMet was more efficient in increasing Se concentrations than MeSeCys and SeNa in pigs, while MeSeCys was more efficient in enhancing selenoprotein gene expression than SeMet and SeNa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kieliszek M, Błażejak S (2016) Current knowledge on the importance of selenium in food for living organisms: a review. Molecules 21:609. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050609

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zarczynska K, Sobiech P, Radwinska J, Rekawek W (2013) Effects of selenium on animal health. J Elementol 18:329–340. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2013.18.2.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao J, Guo F, Zhang L, Dong B, Gong L (2014) Effects of dietary selenomethionine supplementation on growth performance, antioxidant status, plasma selenium concentration, and immune function in weaning pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 5:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-5-46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jlali M, Briens M, Rouffineau F, Geraert PA, Mercier Y (2014) Evaluation of the efficacy of 2-hydroxy-4-methylselenobutanoic acid on growth performance and tissue selenium retention in growing pigs. J Anim Sci 92:182–188. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis TZ, Tiwary AK, Stegelmeier BL, Pfister JA, Panter KE, Hall JO (2017) Comparative oral dose toxicokinetics of sodium selenite and selenomethionine. J Appl Toxicol 37:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoefig CS, Renko K, Köhrle J, Birringer M, Schomburg L (2011) Comparison of different selenocompounds with respect to nutritional value vs. toxicity using liver cells in culture. J Nutr Biochem 22:945–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.08.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kryukov GV, Castellano S, Novoselov SV, Lobanov AV, Zehtab O, Guigó R, Gladyshev VN (2003) Characterization of mammalian selenoproteomes. Science 300:1439–1443. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sunde RA, Raines AM, Barnes KM, Evenson JK (2009) Selenium status highly regulates selenoprotein mRNA levels for only a subset of the selenoproteins in the selenoproteome. Biosci Rep 29:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20080146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Y, Zhao H, Zhang Q, Tang J, Li K, Xia XJ, Wang KN, Li K, Lei XG (2012) Prolonged dietary selenium deficiency or excess does not globally affect selenoprotein gene expression and/or protein production in various tissues of pigs. J Nutr 142:1410–1416. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.159020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou JC, Zhao H, Li JG, Xia XJ, Wang KN, Zhang YJ, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Lei XG (2009) Selenoprotein gene expression in thyroid and pituitary of young pigs is not affected by dietary selenium deficiency or excess. J Nutr 139:1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.104901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang JQ, Li DL, Zhao H, Sun LH, Xia XJ, Wang KN, Luo X, Lei XG (2011) The selenium deficiency disease exudative diathesis in chicks is associated with downregulation of seven common selenoprotein genes in liver and muscle. J Nutr 141:1605–1610. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.145722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun LH, Li JG, Zhao H, Shi J, Huang JQ, Wang KN, Xia XJ, Li L, Lei XG (2013) Porcine serum can be biofortified with selenium to inhibit proliferation of three types of human cancer cells. J Nutr 143:1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.113.177410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao L, Sun LH, Huang JQ, Briens M, Qi DS, Xu SW, Lei XG (2017) A novel organic selenium compound exerts unique regulation of selenium speciation, selenogenome, and selenoproteins in broiler chicks. J Nutr 147:789–797. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.247338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y, Mao Y, Zhang Y, Liang R, Wang R, Zhu L, Meng X, Luo X (2015) Pre-rigor temperature control of Chinese yellow cattle carcasses to 12–18 C during chilling improves beef tenderness. Meat Sci 100:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prieto N, Andrés S, Giráldez FJ, Mantecón AR, Lavín P (2008) Ability of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to estimate physical parameters of adult steers (oxen) and young cattle meat samples. Meat Sci 79:692–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.10.035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Otto G, Roehe R, Looft H, Thoelking L, Knap PW, Rothschild MF, Plastow GS, Kalm E (2007) Associations of DNA markers with meat quality traits in pigs with emphasis on drip loss. Meat Sci 75:185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang K, Guo X, Zhao Q, Han Y, Zhan T, Li Y, Tang C, Zhang J (2020) Development and application of a HPLC-ICP-MS method to determine selenium speciation in muscle of pigs treated with different selenium supplements. Food Chem 302:125371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang K, Zhao Q, Zhan T, Han Y, Li Y, Sun W, Li S, Sun D, Si X, Yu X, Qin Y, Tang C, Zhang J (2019) Targeted metabolomics analysis reveals that dietary supranutritional selenium regulates sugar and acylcarnitine metabolism homeostasis in pig liver. J Nutr (Accept)

  19. Yang J, Zhang Y, Hamid S, Cai J, Liu Q, Li H, Zhao R, Wang H, Xu S, Zhang Z (2017) Interplay between autophagy and apoptosis in selenium deficient cardiomyocytes in chicken. J Inorg Biochem 170:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.02.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahan DC, Cline TR, Richert B (1999) Effects of dietary levels of selenium-enriched yeast and sodium selenite as selenium sources fed to growing-finishing pigs on performance, tissue selenium, serum glutathione peroxidase activity, carcass characteristics, and loin quality. J Anim Sci 77:2172–2179. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7782172x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolter B, Ellis M, McKeith FK, Miller KD, Mahan DC (1999) Influence of dietary selenium source on growth performance, and carcass and meat quality characteristics in pigs. Can J Anim Sci 79:119–121. https://doi.org/10.4141/A98-028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoso PA, Yang Z, Liu C, Li S (2015) Selenium deficiency downregulates selenoproteins and suppresses immune function in chicken thymus. Biol Trace Elem Res 167:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0282-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khoso PA, Zhang Y, Yin H, Teng X, Li S (2019) Selenium deficiency affects immune function by influencing selenoprotein and cytokine expression in chicken spleen. Biol Trace Elem Res 187:506–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1396-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liao X, Lu L, Li S, Liu S, Zhang L, Wang G, Li A, Luo X (2012) Effects of selenium source and level on growth performance, tissue selenium concentrations, antioxidation, and immune functions of heat-stressed broilers. Biol Trace Elem Res 150:158–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9517-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhan XA, Wang M, Zhao RQ, Li WF, Xu ZR (2007) Effects of different selenium source on selenium distribution, loin quality and antioxidant status in finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci and Tech 132:202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Juniper DT, Phipps RH, Bertin G (2011) Effect of dietary supplementation with selenium-enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in commercial-line turkeys. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111000796

  27. Chantiratikul A, Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P (2018) Effect of selenium from selenium-enriched kale sprout versus other selenium sources on productivity and selenium concentrations in egg and tissue of laying hens. Biol Trace Elem Res 182:105–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-017-1069-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Silva VA, Clemente AHS, Nogueira BRF, de Carvalho AC, de Freitas LFVB, Ramos ALS, Bertechini AG (2018) Supplementation of selenomethionine at different ages and levels on meat quality, tissue deposition, and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 98:2150–2159. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schrauzer GN (2000) Selenomethionine: a review of its nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicity. J Nutr 130:1653–1656. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.7.1653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schrauzer GN (2003) The nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicology of selenomethionine. Adv Food Nutr Res 47:73–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(03)47002-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Briens M, Mercier Y, Rouffineau F, Vacchina V, Geraert PA (2013) Comparative study of a new organic selenium source v. seleno-yeast and mineral selenium sources on muscle selenium enrichment and selenium digestibility in broiler chickens. Br J Nutr 110:617–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512005545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Calvo L, Toldrá F, Aristoy MC, López-Bote CJ, Rey AI (2016) Effect of dietary organic selenium on muscle proteolytic activity and water-holding capacity in pork. Meat Sci 121:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.05.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marković R, Ćirić J, Drljačić A, Šefer D, Jovanović I, Jovanović D, Milanović S, Trbović D, Radulović S, Baltić MŽ, Starcevic M (2018) The effects of dietary selenium-yeast level on glutathione peroxidase activity, tissue selenium content, growth performance, and carcass and meat quality of broilers. Poult Sci 97:2861–2870. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vignola G, Lambertini L, Mazzone G, Giammarco M, Tassinari M, Martelli G, Bertin G (2009) Effects of selenium source and level of supplementation on the performance and meat quality of lambs. Meat Sci 81(4):678–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Silva JS, Rodriguez FD, Trettel M, Abal RT, Lima CG, Yoshikawa CYC, Zanetti MA (2019) Performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Nellore cattle supplemented with supranutritional doses of sodium selenite or selenium-enriched yeast. Animal 17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Li JG, Zhou JC, Zhao H, Lei XG, Xia XJ, Gao G, Wang KN (2011) Enhanced water-holding capacity of meat was associated with increased Sepw1 gene expression in pigs fed selenium-enriched yeast. Meat Sci 87:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yao HD, Wu Q, Zhang ZW, Li S, Wang XL, Lei XG, Xu SW (2013) Selenoprotein W serves as an antioxidant in chicken myoblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830:3112–3120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.01.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Calvo L, Segura J, Toldrá F, Flores M, Rodríguez AI, López-Bote CJ, Rey AI (2017) Meat quality, free fatty acid concentration, and oxidative stability of pork from animals fed diets containing different sources of selenium. Food Sci Technol Int 23:716–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013217718964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu X, Wei C, Pan C, Duan Y, Huang K (2010) Regulation of expression and activity of selenoenzymes by different forms and concentrations of selenium in primary cultured chicken hepatocytes. Br J Nutr 104:1605–1612. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510002643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yuan D, Zheng L, Guo XY, Wang YX, Zhan XA (2013) Regulation of selenoprotein P concentration and expression by different sources of selenium in broiler breeders and their offspring. Poult Sci 92:2375–2380. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brandt-Kjelsen A, Govasmark E, Haug A, Salbu B (2014) Turnover of Se in adequately fed chickens using Se-75 as a tracer. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 98:547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFD050040001–02/03), the Special Basic Research Fund for Central Public Research Institutes (Grant No. 2018-YWF-YB-5), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31802073), Key Laboratory of Se-enriched Products Development and Quality Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Se-enriched Food Development, and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP-IAS12; CAAS-XTCX20190025-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chaohua Tang or Junmin Zhang.

Ethics declarations

All of the protocols performed in this study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, K., Zhao, Q., Zhan, T. et al. Effect of Different Selenium Sources on Growth Performance, Tissue Selenium Content, Meat Quality, and Selenoprotein Gene Expression in Finishing Pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res 196, 463–471 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-019-01949-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-019-01949-3

Keywords

Navigation