Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Dietary Selenomethionine Supplementation on Performance and Selenium Status of Broiler Breeders and Their Subsequent Progeny

  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary maternal selenomethionine or sodium selenite supplementation on performance and selenium status of broiler breeders and their next generation. Two hundred and forty 39-week-old Lingnan yellow broiler breeders were allocated randomly into two treatments, each of which included three replicates of 40 birds. Pretreatment period was 2 weeks, and the experiment lasted 8 weeks. The groups were fed the same basal diet supplemented with 0.30 mg selenium/kg of sodium selenite or selenomethionine. After incubation, 180 chicks from the same parental treatment group were randomly divided into three replicates, with 60 birds per replicate. All the offspring were fed the same diet containing 0.04 mg selenium/kg, and the experiment also lasted 8 weeks. Birth rate was greater (p < 0.05) in hens fed with selenomethionine than that in hens fed with sodium selenite. The selenium concentration in serum, liver, kidney, and breast muscle of broiler breeders, selenium deposition in the yolk, and albumen and tissues' (liver, kidney, breast muscle) selenium concentrations of 1-day-old chicks were significantly (p < 0.01) increased by maternal selenomethionine supplementation compared with maternal sodium selenite supplementation. The antioxidant status of 1-day-old chicks was greatly improved by maternal selenomethionine intake in comparison with maternal sodium selenite intake and was evidenced by the increased glutathione peroxidase activity in breast muscle (p < 0.05), superoxide dismutase activity in breast muscle and kidney (p < 0.05), glutathione concentration in kidney (p < 0.01), total antioxidant capability in breast muscle and liver (p < 0.05), and decreased malondialdehyde concentration in liver and pancreas (p < 0.05) of 1-day-old chicks. Feed utilization was better (p < 0.05), and mortality was lower (p < 0.05) in the progeny from hens fed with selenomethionine throughout the 8-week growing period compared with those from hens fed with sodium selenite. In summary, we concluded that maternal selenomethionine supplementation increased birth rate and Se deposition in serum and tissues of broiler breeders as well as in egg yolk and egg albumen more than maternal sodium selenite supplementation. Furthermore, maternal selenomethionine intake was also superior to maternal sodium selenite intake in improving the tissues Se deposition and antioxidant status of 1-day-old chicks and increasing the performance of the progeny during 8 weeks of post-hatch life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang C, Lovell RT (1997) Organic selenium sources, selenomethionine and selenoyeast, have higher bioavailability than an inorganic selenium source, sodium selenite, in diets for channel catfish (Zctalurus punctatus). Aquaculture 152:223–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahan DC, Cline TR, Richert B (1999) Effects of dietary levels of selenium enriched yeast and sodium selenite as selenium sources fed to growing—finishing pigs on performance, tissue selenium, serum glutathione peroxidase activity, carcass characteristics and loin quality. J Anim Sci 77:2172–2179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahmoud KZ, Edens FW (2003) Influence of selenium sources on age related and mild heat stress-related changes of blood and liver glutathione redox cycle in broiler chickens (Gallus domesticus). Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 136(4):921–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotruck JT, Pope AL, Ganther HE, Swanson AB, Hafeman DG, Hoekstra WG (1973) Selenium: biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science 179:588–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brigelius-Flohe R (1999) Tissue-specific functions of individual glutathione peroxidases. Free Radic Biol Med 27:951–965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaa’l T, Me’zes M, Noble RC, Dixon J, Speake BK (1995) Development of antioxidant capacity in tissues of the chick embryo. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 112(4):711–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Surai PF (2000) Effect of selenium and vitamin E content of the maternal diet on the antioxidant system of the yolk and the developing chick. Br Poult Sci 41:235–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Paton ND, Cantor AH, Pescatore AJ, Ford MJ, Smith CA (2002) The effect of dietary selenium source and level on the uptake of selenium by developing chick embryos. Poult Sci 81:1548–1554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pappas AC, Karadas F, Surai PF, Speake BK (2005) The selenium intake of the female chicken influences the selenium status of her progeny. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 142(4):465–474

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beistein MA, Whanger PD (1986) Deposition of dietary organic and inorganic Se in rat erythrocyte protein. J Nutr 116:1701–1710

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schrauzer GN (2000) Selenomethionine: a review of its nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicity. J Nutr 130:1653–1656

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schrauzer GN (2003) The nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicology of selenomethionine. Adv Food Nutr Res 47:73–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. National Research Council (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th edn. National Academies, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ga'miz-Gracia L, de Castro MD, Luque (1999) Determination of selenium in nutritional supplements and shampoos by flow injection-hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Talanta 50:875–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lawrence RA, Burk RF (1976) Glutathione peroxidase activity in selenium-deficient rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 71:952–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Panckenko LF, Brusov OS, Gerasimov AM, Loktaeva AE (1975) Intramitochondrial localization and release of rat liver superoxide dismutase. FEBS Lett 55:84–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beutler E, Duron O, Kelly BM (1963) Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J Lab Clin Med 61:882–888

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Placer ZA, Cushman LL, Johnson BC (1966) Estimation of product of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde) in biochemical systems. Anal Biochem 16:359–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sefton AE, Edens FW (2004) Sel-Plex improves semen quality in broiler breeder males in a cage environment. Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industry. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium (Suppl. 1), 22–26 May 2004, Lexington, Kentucky, p 33

  21. Leeson S, Namkung H, Caston L, Durosoy S, Schlegel P (2008) Comparison of selenium levels and sources and dietary fat quality in diets for broiler breeders and layer hens. Poult Sci 87:2605–2612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Utterback PL, Parsons CM, Yoon I (2005) Effect of supplementing selenium yeast in diets of laying hens on egg selenium content. Poult Sci 84:1900–1910

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Payne RL, Lavergne TK, Southern LL (2005) Effect of inorganic versus organic selenium on hen production and egg selenium concentration. Poult Sci 84:232–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li JK, Wang XL (2004) Effect of dietary organic versus inorganic selenium in laying hens on the productivity, selenium distribution in egg and selenium content in blood, liver and kidney. J Trace Elem Med Biol 18:65–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pan GL, Huang KH, Zhao YX, Qin SY, Chen F, Hu QH (2007) Effect of selenium source and level in hen’s diet on tissue selenium deposition and egg selenium concentrations. J Agric Food Chem 55:1027–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolfram S, Berger B, Grenacher B, Scharrer E (1989) Transport of seleno amino acids and their sulphur analogues across the intestinal brush border membrane. J Nutr 119:706–712

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cantor AH (1997) The role of selenium in poultry nutrition. In: Lyons TP, Jacques KA (eds) Biotechnology in the feed industry. Proceedings of Alltech's 13th annual symposium. Nottingham University, Nottingham, pp 155–164

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paton ND, Cantor AH, Pescatore AJ, Ford MJ, Smith CA (2000) Effect of dietary selenium source and level of inclusion on selenium content of incubated eggs. Poult Sci 79(Supp. l):40

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cantor AH, Scott ML (1974) The effect of selenium in the hen's diet on egg production, hatchability, performance of progeny and selenium concentration in eggs. Poult Sci 53:1870–1880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Davis RH, Fear J, Winton AC (1996) Interactions between dietary selenium, copper, and sodium nitroprusside, a source of cyanide in growing chicks and laying hens. Br Poult Sci 37:87–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cantor AH, Straw ML, Ford MJ, Pescatore AJ, Dunlap MK (2000) Effect of feeding organic selenium in diets of laying hens on egg selenium content. In: Sim JS, Nakai S, Guenter W (eds) Egg nutrition and biotechnology. CABI, New York, p 473

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patton ND (2000) Organic selenium in the nutrition of laying hens: effects on egg selenium content, egg quality and transfer to developing chick embryos. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington

  33. Richards MP (1977) Trace mineral metabolism in the avian embryo. Poult Sci 76:152–164

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miles RD (2000) Trace minerals and avian embryo development. Cienc Anim Bras 2(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gerhartz B, Kolb HJ, Wittmann J (1999) Proteolytic activity in the yolk sac membrane of quail eggs. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 123(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hassan S (1986) Effect of dietary selenium on the prevention of exudative diathesis in chicks, with special reference to selenium transfer via eggs. J Vet Med A 33:689–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rayman MP (2000) The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 365:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gunter SA, Beck PA, Phillips JM (2003) Effects of supplementary selenium source on the performance and blood measurements in beef cows and their calves. J Anim Sci 81:856–864

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Surai PF, Ionov IA, Kuchmistova EF, Noble RC, Speake BK (1998) The relationship between the levels of α-tocopherol and carotenoids in the maternal feed, yolk and neonatal tissues: comparison between the chicken, turkey, duck and goose. J Sci Food Agric 76:593–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. China Feed Database (1999) Table of feed composition and nutritive value in China: 1998 edition. China Feed 4:25–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The financial support provided by the Program for Century Excellent Talents in University (project NECT-07-0758) and the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (project NYCYTX-42-G2-06) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XiuAn Zhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Zhan, X., Yuan, D. et al. Influence of Dietary Selenomethionine Supplementation on Performance and Selenium Status of Broiler Breeders and Their Subsequent Progeny. Biol Trace Elem Res 143, 1497–1507 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-011-8976-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-011-8976-2

Keywords

Navigation