Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conversion of Industrial Paper Sludge to Ethanol: Fractionation of Sludge and Its Impact

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Paper sludge is an attractive biomass source for the conversion to ethanol due to its low cost and the lack of severe pretreatment required. Four sludges from pulp and paper operations including both virgin kraft (VK) and recycled and deinking (RD) paper mills were analyzed. A fractionation process using a laboratory screen was utilized to produce a fiber-rich stream for enzymatic hydrolysis. This process removed 82–98 % of the ash with fiber yields from 39 to 69 %. Even though sludges in both non-fractionated and fractionated scenarios were pH-adjusted, total sugar conversion was still improved by 12–27 % by fractionation with 4.5 times less acid required for pH adjustment. Fermentation of the fractionated sludges showed very high ethanol yields. Acid insoluble clay adsorbs 3–5 mg enzyme per gram of clay depending on enzyme dosage. Acid soluble CaCO3 adsorbs about half of the enzyme compared to clay. Fractionation efficiency was also evaluated by testing different size mesh screen openings (100 to 500 mesh). The 400-mesh screen presented the best fiber yield, ash removal and ash fractionation ratio for both VK and RD sludges. The ash-rich streams have a lower C/N ratio than the original sludge which improves its suitability as soil amendment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitken, M., Evans, B., & Lewis, J. (1998). Effect of applying paper mill sludge to arable land on soil fertility and crop yields. Soil Use and Management, 14, 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballesteros, M., Oliva, J., Manzanares, P., Negro, M., & Ballesteros, I. (2002). Ethanol production from paper material using a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation system in a fed-batch basis. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 18, 559–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bengtsson, G., Bengtson, P., & Månsson, K. F. (2003). Gross nitrogen mineralization-, immobilization-, and nitrification rates as a function of soil C/N ratio and microbial activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 143–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Camberato, J., Gagnon, B., Angers, D., Chantigny, M., & Pan, W. (2006). Pulp and paper mill by-products as soil amendments and plant nutrient sources. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 86, 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Canales, A., Pareilleux, A., Rols, J., Goma, G., & Huyard, A. (1994). Decreased sludge production strategy for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Science and Technology, 30, 97–106.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Charest, M.-H., Antoun, H., & Beauchamp, C. (2004). Dynamics of water-soluble carbon substances and microbial populations during the composting of de-inking paper sludge. Bioresource Technology, 91, 53–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, H., Venditti, R., Gonzalez, R., Phillips, R., Jameel, H., & Park, S. (2014). Economic evaluation of the conversion of industrial paper sludge to ethanol. Energy Economics, 44, 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, H., Venditti, R. A., Jameel, H., & Park, S. (2012). Enzymatic hydrolysis of recovered office printing paper with low enzyme dosages to produce fermentable sugars. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 166, 1121–1136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper, D. J., & Erickson, J. R. (1996). Agenda 2020: a technology vision and research agenda for America’s forest, wood, and paper industry. Forest Products Journal, 46, 22–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fierro, A., Angers, D. A., & Beauchamp, C. J. (1999). Restoration of ecosystem function in an abandoned sandpit: plant and soil responses to paper de-inking sludge. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36, 244–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghose, T. K. (1987). Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 59, 257–268.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Göttsching, L., & Pakarinen, H. (2000). Book 7: recycled fiber and deinking (p. 14). Jyväskylä: Gummerus Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Henry, C. L. (1991). Nitrogen dynamics of pulp and paper sludge amendment to forest soils. Water Science and Technology, 24, 417–425.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu, Z., & Wen, Z. (2008). Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass by microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 38, 369–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson, M., Line, M., Wilson, S., & Hetherington, S. (2000). Application of composted pulp and paper mill sludge to a young pine plantation. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 407–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Janssen, B. (1996). Nitrogen mineralization in relation to C: N ratio and decomposability of organic materials. Plant and Soil, 181, 39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeffries, T. W., & Schartman, R. (1999). Bioconversion of secondary fiber fines to ethanol using counter-current enzymatic saccharification and co-fermentation. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 78, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang, L., Wang, W., & Lee, Y. Y. (2010). Bioconversion of kraft paper mill sludges to ethanol by SSF and SSCF. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 161, 53–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang, L., Wang, W., Pallapolu, V. R., & Lee, Y. Y. (2011). Enhanced ethanol production from de-ashed paper sludge by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation. BioResources, 6, 3791–3808.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keating, J. D., Panganiban, C., & Mansfield, S. D. (2006). Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 93, 1196–1206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lynd, L. R., Lyford, K., South, C. R., van Walsum, P., & Levenson, K. (2001). Evaluation of paper sludge for amenability to enzymatic hydrolysis and conversion to ethanol. Tappi Journal, 84, 50–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahmood, T., & Elliott, A. (2006). A review of secondary sludge reduction technologies for the pulp and paper industry. Water Research, 40, 2093–2112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McGovern, J., Berbee, J., Bockheim, J., & Baker, A. (1983). Characteristics of combined effluent treatment sludges from several types of pulp and paper mills. Tappi Journal, 66, 115–118.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mittra, B., Karmakar, S., Swain, D., & Ghosh, B. (2005). Fly ash—a potential source of soil amendment and a component of integrated plant nutrient supply system. Fuel, 84, 1447–1451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. NCASI. (1992). Solid waste management and disposal practices in the U.S. paper industry. New York: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nikolov, T., Bakalova, N., Petrova, S., Benadova, R., Spasov, S., & Kolev, D. (2000). An effective method for bioconversion of delignified waste-cellulose fibers from the paper industry with a cellulase complex. Bioresource Technology, 71, 1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng, L., & Chen, Y. (2011). Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 1600–1606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Scott, W. E. (1996). Principles of wet end chemistry. Atlanta: Tappi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sims, J., Vasilas, B., & Ghodrati, M. (1995). Evaluation of fly ash as a soil amendment for the Atlantic Coastal Plain: II. Soil chemical properties and crop growth. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 81, 363–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., & Crocker, D. (2004). Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Golden: NREL.

    Google Scholar 

  32. TAPPI, T. (1993). Ash in wood and pulp. TAPPI test methods T 211 om-85.

  33. TAPPI, T. (1993). Ash in wood, pulp, paper and paperboard: combustion at 525 °C. TAPPI test methods T 211 om-93.

  34. Wingren, A., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2003). Techno economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnology Progress, 19, 1109–1117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zibilske, L. M. (1987). Dynamics of nitrogen and carbon in soil during papermill sludge decomposition1. Soil Science, 143, 26–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the sponsor of this project the Biofuels Center of North Carolina. The project is “Low cost conversion of industrial sludges to ethanol”; grant number 2009-114-E. The support from Mascoma Corp. for fermentation is also much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Venditti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Han, Q., Daniel, K. et al. Conversion of Industrial Paper Sludge to Ethanol: Fractionation of Sludge and Its Impact. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174, 2096–2113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1083-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1083-z

Keywords

Navigation