Abstract
Paper sludge is an attractive biomass source for the conversion to ethanol due to its low cost and the lack of severe pretreatment required. Four sludges from pulp and paper operations including both virgin kraft (VK) and recycled and deinking (RD) paper mills were analyzed. A fractionation process using a laboratory screen was utilized to produce a fiber-rich stream for enzymatic hydrolysis. This process removed 82–98 % of the ash with fiber yields from 39 to 69 %. Even though sludges in both non-fractionated and fractionated scenarios were pH-adjusted, total sugar conversion was still improved by 12–27 % by fractionation with 4.5 times less acid required for pH adjustment. Fermentation of the fractionated sludges showed very high ethanol yields. Acid insoluble clay adsorbs 3–5 mg enzyme per gram of clay depending on enzyme dosage. Acid soluble CaCO3 adsorbs about half of the enzyme compared to clay. Fractionation efficiency was also evaluated by testing different size mesh screen openings (100 to 500 mesh). The 400-mesh screen presented the best fiber yield, ash removal and ash fractionation ratio for both VK and RD sludges. The ash-rich streams have a lower C/N ratio than the original sludge which improves its suitability as soil amendment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken, M., Evans, B., & Lewis, J. (1998). Effect of applying paper mill sludge to arable land on soil fertility and crop yields. Soil Use and Management, 14, 215–222.
Ballesteros, M., Oliva, J., Manzanares, P., Negro, M., & Ballesteros, I. (2002). Ethanol production from paper material using a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation system in a fed-batch basis. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 18, 559–561.
Bengtsson, G., Bengtson, P., & Månsson, K. F. (2003). Gross nitrogen mineralization-, immobilization-, and nitrification rates as a function of soil C/N ratio and microbial activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 143–154.
Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254.
Camberato, J., Gagnon, B., Angers, D., Chantigny, M., & Pan, W. (2006). Pulp and paper mill by-products as soil amendments and plant nutrient sources. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 86, 641–653.
Canales, A., Pareilleux, A., Rols, J., Goma, G., & Huyard, A. (1994). Decreased sludge production strategy for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Science and Technology, 30, 97–106.
Charest, M.-H., Antoun, H., & Beauchamp, C. (2004). Dynamics of water-soluble carbon substances and microbial populations during the composting of de-inking paper sludge. Bioresource Technology, 91, 53–67.
Chen, H., Venditti, R., Gonzalez, R., Phillips, R., Jameel, H., & Park, S. (2014). Economic evaluation of the conversion of industrial paper sludge to ethanol. Energy Economics, 44, 281–290.
Chen, H., Venditti, R. A., Jameel, H., & Park, S. (2012). Enzymatic hydrolysis of recovered office printing paper with low enzyme dosages to produce fermentable sugars. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 166, 1121–1136.
Cooper, D. J., & Erickson, J. R. (1996). Agenda 2020: a technology vision and research agenda for America’s forest, wood, and paper industry. Forest Products Journal, 46, 22–26.
Fierro, A., Angers, D. A., & Beauchamp, C. J. (1999). Restoration of ecosystem function in an abandoned sandpit: plant and soil responses to paper de-inking sludge. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36, 244–253.
Ghose, T. K. (1987). Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 59, 257–268.
Göttsching, L., & Pakarinen, H. (2000). Book 7: recycled fiber and deinking (p. 14). Jyväskylä: Gummerus Printing.
Henry, C. L. (1991). Nitrogen dynamics of pulp and paper sludge amendment to forest soils. Water Science and Technology, 24, 417–425.
Hu, Z., & Wen, Z. (2008). Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass by microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 38, 369–378.
Jackson, M., Line, M., Wilson, S., & Hetherington, S. (2000). Application of composted pulp and paper mill sludge to a young pine plantation. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 407–414.
Janssen, B. (1996). Nitrogen mineralization in relation to C: N ratio and decomposability of organic materials. Plant and Soil, 181, 39–45.
Jeffries, T. W., & Schartman, R. (1999). Bioconversion of secondary fiber fines to ethanol using counter-current enzymatic saccharification and co-fermentation. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 78, 435–444.
Kang, L., Wang, W., & Lee, Y. Y. (2010). Bioconversion of kraft paper mill sludges to ethanol by SSF and SSCF. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 161, 53–66.
Kang, L., Wang, W., Pallapolu, V. R., & Lee, Y. Y. (2011). Enhanced ethanol production from de-ashed paper sludge by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation. BioResources, 6, 3791–3808.
Keating, J. D., Panganiban, C., & Mansfield, S. D. (2006). Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 93, 1196–1206.
Lynd, L. R., Lyford, K., South, C. R., van Walsum, P., & Levenson, K. (2001). Evaluation of paper sludge for amenability to enzymatic hydrolysis and conversion to ethanol. Tappi Journal, 84, 50–55.
Mahmood, T., & Elliott, A. (2006). A review of secondary sludge reduction technologies for the pulp and paper industry. Water Research, 40, 2093–2112.
McGovern, J., Berbee, J., Bockheim, J., & Baker, A. (1983). Characteristics of combined effluent treatment sludges from several types of pulp and paper mills. Tappi Journal, 66, 115–118.
Mittra, B., Karmakar, S., Swain, D., & Ghosh, B. (2005). Fly ash—a potential source of soil amendment and a component of integrated plant nutrient supply system. Fuel, 84, 1447–1451.
NCASI. (1992). Solid waste management and disposal practices in the U.S. paper industry. New York: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. (NCASI).
Nikolov, T., Bakalova, N., Petrova, S., Benadova, R., Spasov, S., & Kolev, D. (2000). An effective method for bioconversion of delignified waste-cellulose fibers from the paper industry with a cellulase complex. Bioresource Technology, 71, 1–4.
Peng, L., & Chen, Y. (2011). Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 1600–1606.
Scott, W. E. (1996). Principles of wet end chemistry. Atlanta: Tappi Press.
Sims, J., Vasilas, B., & Ghodrati, M. (1995). Evaluation of fly ash as a soil amendment for the Atlantic Coastal Plain: II. Soil chemical properties and crop growth. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 81, 363–372.
Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., & Crocker, D. (2004). Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Golden: NREL.
TAPPI, T. (1993). Ash in wood and pulp. TAPPI test methods T 211 om-85.
TAPPI, T. (1993). Ash in wood, pulp, paper and paperboard: combustion at 525 °C. TAPPI test methods T 211 om-93.
Wingren, A., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2003). Techno economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnology Progress, 19, 1109–1117.
Zibilske, L. M. (1987). Dynamics of nitrogen and carbon in soil during papermill sludge decomposition1. Soil Science, 143, 26–33.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the sponsor of this project the Biofuels Center of North Carolina. The project is “Low cost conversion of industrial sludges to ethanol”; grant number 2009-114-E. The support from Mascoma Corp. for fermentation is also much appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, H., Han, Q., Daniel, K. et al. Conversion of Industrial Paper Sludge to Ethanol: Fractionation of Sludge and Its Impact. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174, 2096–2113 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1083-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1083-z