Skip to main content
Log in

Protein Extraction and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Ammonia-Treated Cassava Leaves (Manihot esculenta Crantz)

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present work, cassava leaves were treated with 0.5 kg ammonia/kg dry matter at 78 °C and 30% moisture content in a 2-kg reactor. Protein extraction was carried out with a calcium hydroxide solution (pH 10) for 30 min at several temperatures (30 °C, 45 °C, 60 °C, 75 °C, and 90 °C) and solid/liquid ratios (1:10 and 1:15) in a thermostatized bath. Soluble protein content of the extracts was determined by Lowry’s method. Dry substrate concentrations of 5%, 7.5%, and 10% and enzyme doses of 2 and 5 IU/g dry matter were used for the enzymatic hydrolysis in an orbital incubator at 50 °C and 100 rpm. Both cellulase and xylanase were used. Reducing sugars produced were determined with the dinitrosalicylic acid method. The highest protein extraction yield for the ammonia-treated leaves was 29.10%, which was 50% higher than with the untreated leaves (20%), and was obtained at 90 °C with a 1:10 solid/liquid ratio. The concentrate had a protein content of 36.35% and the amino acid profile was suitable for swine and poultry. The highest sugar yield was 54.72% with respect to theoretical and was obtained with 5% solids and an enzyme dose of 5 IU/g dry matter. This yield was 3.4 times higher than the yield of the untreated leaves (16.13%). These results indicate that cassava leaves have a great potential for animal feeding and ethanol production. Both protein extraction and sugar yields may be enhanced by optimizing the ammonia treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAO. (2008). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. News release 08-82. FAO Media Office. Rome. July 25.

  2. Ravindran, V. (1992). FAO animal production and health paper 95. Rome, pp. 111–126.

  3. Mastrodi, J., & Correa, A. (1986). Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion, 36, 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Achidi, A. U., Ajayi, O. A., Maziya-Dixon, B., & Bokanga, M. (2008). Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 32, 486–502. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4549.2007.00165.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Urribarrí, L., Ferrer, A., & Colina, A. (2005). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 121/124, 721–730. doi:10.1385/ABAB:122:1-3:0721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Correa, A. D., dos Santos, S. R., de Abreu, C. M. P., Jokl, L., & dos Santos, C. D. (2004). Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 24, 159–164.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrer, A., Byers, F. M., Sulbarán de Ferrer, B., Dale, B. E., & Aiello, C. (2000). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84/86, 163–179. doi:10.1385/ABAB:84-86:1-9:163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Covenin 1156–79 (1979). Alimentos para animales. Determinación de humedad. Venezuela: Ministerio de Industrias Ligeras y Comercio.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.O.A.C. (1980). 13th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. pp. 125.

  10. Goering, H. K., & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Agric. handbook, vol. 379. Washington, DC: ARS-USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lowry, O., Rosebrough, N., Farr, A., & Randall, R. (1951). The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265–275.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, G. (1959). Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426–428. doi:10.1021/ac60147a030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Urribarrí, L., Ferrer, A., & Colina, A. (2004). Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, 21, 264–275.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pico Tag Work Station. (1984). Operator’s Manual. Waters Publications. U.S.A. Chapter 3. 22 p.

  15. National Research Council (1998). Subcommittee on swine nutrition (10th ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Research Council (1994). Subcommittee on poultry nutrition (9th ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ferrer, A., Byers, F., Sulbarán de Ferrer, B., Dale, B. E., & Aiello, C. (2002). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 98/100, 123–134. doi:10.1385/ABAB:98-100:1-9:123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, Y., & Cheng, J. (2002). Bioresource Technology, 83, 1–11. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00212-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ballesteros, M., Oliva, J. M., Negro, M. J., Manzanares, P., & Ballesteros, I. (2004). Process Biochemistry, 39, 1843–1848. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2003.09.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. FAO (2008). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of Food and Agriculture. Biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities. Rome: Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch—FAO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from CONDES (University of Zulia, Maracaibo, Venezuela), INIA (Maracaibo, Venezuela), and INZIT (Maracaibo, Venezuela) is greatly acknowledged. We are very grateful to Leonardo Zarrameda in INIA-ZULIA for supplying the cassava leaves.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexis Ferrer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urribarrí, L., Chacón, D., González, O. et al. Protein Extraction and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Ammonia-Treated Cassava Leaves (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Appl Biochem Biotechnol 153, 94–102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8422-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8422-x

Keywords

Navigation