Skip to main content
Log in

Application Relevant Studies of Fungal β-galactosidases with Potential Application in the Alleviation of Lactose Intolerance

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Functional screening studies revealed that Aspergillus carbonarius ATCC6276 produced extracellular β-galactosidase activity potentially suited for use as a lactase digestive supplement in the treatment of lactose intolerance. The crude preparation contained two β-galactosidase activities, β-gal 1 and β-gal 2, which were separated by ion-exchange chromatography. Both enzymes were purified to homogeneity by a combination of gel filtration, ion-exchange, chromatofocusing and hydrophobic interaction chromatographies. β-gal 1 and β-gal 2 displayed differences in molecular mass (110 kDa versus 120 kDa as judged by SDS PAGE) and in a range of additional physicochemical properties. Km values of 83 and 309 mM, respectively, were recorded using lactose as substrate while temperature optima of 55°C versus 65°C were obtained. Unlike current commercialized supplemental lactases, both of the purified enzymes displayed significant stability when exposed to simulated gastric conditions, with β-gal 1in particular retaining 70% residual activity after exposure to pH 2.0 in the presence of pepsin for 2 h. Overall the results indicate that the β-galactosidases of Aspergillus carbonarius ATCC6276, either individually or in combination, may be suitable for use as a digestive supplement for the alleviation of lactose intolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakayama, T., & Amachi, T. (1999). in Encyclopedia of bioprocess technology, fermentation, biocatalysis and bioseparation, 1st edn. Flinckinger and Drew, (eds). Wiley, NY, pp 1291–1305.

  2. Hung, M., & Lee, B. (2002). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 58, 439–445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brady, D., Marchant, L., McHale, L., & McHale, A. (1995). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 17, 696–699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moskovitz, M., Curtis, C., & Gavaler, J. (1987). American journal of gastroenterology, 82, 632–635.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Medow, M., Thek, K., Newman, L., Berezin, S., Glassman, M., & Schwarz, S. (1990). American Journal of Diseases of Children, 114, 1261–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, M., Dipalma, J., Martini, M., Gross, C., Harlander, S., & Savaiano, D. (1993). Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 38, 2022–2027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanabar, D., Randhawa, M., & Clayton, P. (2001). Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 14, 359–363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao, K., Mitsui, T., Fujiki, K., Ishiguro, H., & Kondo, T. (2002). Nagoya Journal of Medical Science, 65, 21–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Connell, S., & Walsh, G. (2006). Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 134, 179–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nevalinen, H. (1981). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 41, 593–596.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rasouli, I., & Kulkarni, P. (1994). Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 77, 359–361.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bradford, M. (1976). Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laemmli, U. (1970). Nature, 227, 680–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagy, Z., Kiss, T., Szentirmai, A., & Biro, S. (2001). Protein Expression and Purification, 21, 24–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaikh, S., Khire, J., & Khan, M. (1999). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1472, 314–322.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xenos, K., Kyroundis, S., Anagnostidis, A., & Papastathopoulos, P. (1998). European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 23, 350–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ingels, F., Deferme, S., Destexhe, E., Oth, M., Van den Mooter, G., & Augustijns, P. (2002). International journal of pharmaceutics, 232, 183–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. United States Pharmacopeia. (2000). 25/NF 23, the United States pharmaceutical convention, Rockville, MD. Page 2235.

  19. Chakraborti, S., Sani, R., Banerjee, U., & Sobti, R. (2000). Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 24, 58–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonnet, F., Lemaître, G., Waksman, G., & Tortajada, J. (2003). Proteome Sci., 1, 2.

  21. Perkins, D., Pappin, D., Creasy, D., & Cottrell, J. (1999). Electrophoresis, 20, 3551–3567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sathiabana-Seelan, R., & Shanmugasundaram, E. (1981). Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 63, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gonzalez, R., & Monsan, P. (1991). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 13, 349–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Gindy, A. (2003). Folia Microbiologica, 48, 581–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin, J., Murphy, R., & Power, R. (2006). Bioresource Technology, 97, 1703–1708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boyce, A., & Walsh, G. (2007). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 76, 835–841.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Davenport, H. (1982). Physiology of the digestive tract (5th ed.). London, UK: Yearbook medical publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ladero, M., Santos, A., Garcia, J., Carrascosa, A., Pessela, B., & Garcia-Ochoa, F. (2002). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 30, 392–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Manzanares, P., de Graff, L., & Visser, J. (1998). Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 22, 383–390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Widmer, F., & Leuba, J. (1979). European Journal of Biochemistry, 100, 559–567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tanaka, Y., Kagamiishi, A., Kiuchi, A., & Horiuchi, T. (1975). Journal of Biochemistry (Tokyo), 77, 241–247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Geskas, V., & Lopez-Levia, M. (1985). Process Biochemistry, 20, 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Funded in part by Enterprise Ireland under the Irish National Development Program, 2001–2006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Walsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Connell, S., Walsh, G. Application Relevant Studies of Fungal β-galactosidases with Potential Application in the Alleviation of Lactose Intolerance. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 149, 129–138 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8098-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-8098-7

Keywords

Navigation