Skip to main content
Log in

Customer sentiment appraisal from user-generated product reviews: a domain independent heuristic algorithm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media give new opportunities in customer survey and market survey for design inspiration with comments posted online by users spontaneously, in an oral-near language, and almost free of biases. Opinion mining techniques are being developed, especially customer sentiment analysis. These techniques are most of the time based on a text parsing and costly learning techniques based on target or domain-dependent corpora for getting a fine understanding of users’ preferences. On the contrary, in this paper, we propose an overall sentiment rating algorithm, accurate enough to deliver an overall rating on a product review, without a tedious customization to a product domain or customer polarities. The developed algorithm starts by a text parsing, uses a Dictionary of Affect Language to rate the word tree leaves and uses a series of basic heuristics to calculate backward an overall sentiment rating for the review. We validate it on the example of a commercial home theatre system, comparing our automated sentiment predictions with the one of a group of fifteen test subjects, resulting in a satisfactory correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petiot, J.-F., Furet, B.: Product, process and industrial system: innovative research tracks. Int. J. Interact. Design Manuf. (IJIDeM) 4(1), 211–213 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McGue, M., Bouchard, T.J.: Genetic and environmental influences on human behavorial differences. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 1–24 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis, K., van Horn, D.: Design Analytics in Consumer Product Design: A Simulated Study, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Portland (2013)

  4. Bollen, J., Mao, H., Zeng, X.-J.: Twitter mood predicts stock market. J. Comput. Sci. 2(1), 1–6 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caragea, C., McNeese, N., Jaiswal, A., Traylor, G., Kim, H.W., Mitra, P., Wu, D., Tapia, A.H., Giles, L., Jansen, B.J.: Classifying text messages for the haiti earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM2011) (2011)

  6. Culotta, A.: Towards detecting influenza epidemics by analyzing Twitter messages. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics (SOMA ’10), pp. 115–122. ACM, New York (2010)

  7. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dong, A., Kleinsmann, M., Valkenburg, R.: Affect-in-cognition through the language of appraisals. Design Studies 30(2), 138–153 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, X., Dong, A.: A case study of computing appraisals in design text. Paper presented at the DCC’08: International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition (2008)

  10. Vanrompay, Y., Cataldi, M., Le Glouanec, M., Aufaure, M.-A., Lamolle, M.: Sentiment analysis for dynamic user preference inference in spoken dialogue systems. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Semantic Sentiment Analysis (SSA) at ESWC2014 (2014)

  11. Cataldi, M., Ballatore, A., Tiddi, I., Aufaure, M.-A.: Good location, terrible food: detecting (2013)

  12. Weidlich, D., Cser, L., Polzin, T., Cristiano, D., Zickner, H.: Virtual reality approaches for immersive design. Int. J. Interact. Design Manuf. (IJIDeM) 3(2), 103–108 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bénabès, J., Bennis, F., Poirson, E., Ravaut, Y.: Interactive optimization strategies for layout problems. Int. J. Interact. Design Manuf. (IJIDeM) 4(3), 181–190 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mobach, M.P.: Interactive facility management, design and planning. Int. J. Interact. Design Manuf. (IJIDeM) 6(4), 241–250 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Serna, L., Merlo, C., Zolghadri, M., Minel, S.: Actors’ networks management for design co-ordination. Int. J. Interact. Design Manuf. (IJIDeM) 5(1), 67–71 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giannini, F., Monti, M., Biondi, D., Bonfatti, F., Moanari, P.D.: A modelling tool for the management of product data in a co-design environment. Comput. Aided Des. 34, 1063–1073 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and subjectivity. In: Indurkhya, F.J.N. (ed.) Handbook of Natural Language Processing. Chicago (2010)

  18. Fenech, O.C., Borg, J.C.: Exploiting emotions for successful product design. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Engineering Design ICED’07 (2007)

  19. Holbrook, M., Hirshchman, E.: The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings and fun. J. Consum. Res. 9(2), 132–140 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Richins, M.: Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. J. Consum. Res. 24(2), 127–146 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Buttle, F.: Customer Relationship Management. Butterworth-Heinemann, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Berry, M.J., Linoff, G.: Data Mining Techniques: For Marketing, Sales, and Customer Support. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bennekom, F.C.V.: Customer Surveying: A Guidebook for Service Managers. Customer Service Press (2002)

  24. Kushal, D., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D.: Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: WWW2003, Budapest (2003)

  25. Tucker, C., Kim, H.: Predicting emerging product design trend by mining publicly available customer review data. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED11), vol. 6, pp. 43–52 (2011)

  26. OConnor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B.R., Smith, N.A.: From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 122–129 (2010)

  27. Stone, P.J., Dunphy, D.C., Smith, M.S., Ogilvie, D.M.: The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press, Massachusetts (1966)

  28. Iker, H.P.: SELECT: a computer program to identify associationally rich words for content analysis. I. Statistical results. Comput. Human. 8, 313–319 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Herring, S.R., Poon, C.M., Balasi, Geoffrey A., Bailey, B.P.: TweetSpiration: leveraging social media for design inspiration. CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 2311–2316. ACM (2011)

  30. Nazarenko, A., Habert, B., Reynaud, C.: “Open response” surveys: from tagging to syntactic and semantic analysis. In: Proceedings of JADT (3rd International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data), vol. II, pp. 29–36, Rome (1995)

  31. Halliday, M.A.K.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1rst edn. Arnold, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. LREC conference, pp. 24–37 (2010)

  33. Chowdary, G.: Natural language processing. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 37, 51–89 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liddy, E.: Enhanced text retrieval using natural language processing. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1998, 14–16 (1998)

  35. Naman, M., Boase, J., Lai, C.-H.: Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 189–192 (2010)

  36. Bollen, J., Mao, H., Pepe, A.: Modelling public mood and sentiment: Twitter Sentiment and Socio-Economic Phenomena. AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Media. Michigan, pp. 450–453 (2011)

  37. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. SIGKDD, pp. 168–177 (2004)

  38. Manning, C.D., Klein, D.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 423–430 (2003)

  39. de Marneffe, M.-C., Manning, C.D.: The Stanford typed dependencies representation, CrossParser ’08 Coling 2008. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, pp. 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2008)

  40. Whissel, C.: The Dictionary of Affect in Language. Academic Press, London (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Bryne, R.: The Secret [Motion Picture] (2006)

  42. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Yannou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raghupathi, D., Yannou, B., Farel, R. et al. Customer sentiment appraisal from user-generated product reviews: a domain independent heuristic algorithm. Int J Interact Des Manuf 9, 201–211 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-015-0273-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-015-0273-4

Keywords

Navigation